Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:53:21.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Doctors and Patients Agree?: Views of the Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Nick Black ,
Mark Petticrew ,
Maria Ginzler ,
Ann Flood ,
Joe Smith ,
Grant Williams ,
Jane Davies ,
Helen Doll  and
Klim Mcpherson
Nick Black
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Mark Petticrew
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Maria Ginzler
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Ann Flood
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Joe Smith
Affiliation:
Churchill Hospital, Oxford
Grant Williams
Affiliation:
Harley Street Clinic, London
Jane Davies
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Helen Doll
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Klim Mcpherson
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an attempt to establish the extent to which patients and doctors agree on the outcome of health care, the pre- and postoperative states of health of 388 men undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate for benign disease were studied. Generally, high levels of concordance (>70%) were obtained. The strongest agreement was for clearly defined events, such as episodes of acute retention (95%); the weakest agreement occurred over the most subjective symptoms, prognostic expectations, and ambiguous terms (around 60%). The level of agreement was not associated with any characteristics of the patient, surgeon, or treatment.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1991 , pp. 533 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Carlson, H., & Pellettieri, L.Doctors’ versus patients’ evaluation of results after neurosurgery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1989, 52, 153–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Ferraro, K. F.Self-ratings of health among the old and the old-old. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 1980, 21, 377–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Fillenbaum, G. G.Social context and self-assessment of health among the elderly. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 1979, 20, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Friedsam, H. J., & Martin, H. W.A comparison of self and physicians’ health ratings in an older population. Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 1963, 4, 179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Garrity, T. F., Somes, G. W., & Marx, M. B.Factors influencing self-assessment of health. Social Science and Medicine, 1978, 12, 77–81.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Goligher, J. C., Pulvertaft, C. N., Watkinson, G., et al. Controlled trial of vagotomy and antrectomy, and subtotal gastrectomy in elective treatment of duodenal ulcer. British Medical Journal, 1964, 1, 455–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Jachuck, S. J., Brierley, H., Jachuck, S., & Willcox, P. M.The effect of hypotensive drugs on the quality of life. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1982, 32,103–05.Google ScholarPubMed
8.LaRue, A., Bank, L., Jarvik, L., et al. Health in old age: How do physicians’ ratings and self-ratings compare? Journal of Gerontology, 1979, 34, 687–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Linn, B. S. & Linn, M. W.Objective and self-assessed health in the old and very old. Social Science and Medicine, 1980, 14a, 311–15.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Macintyre, S., & Pritchard, C.Comparisons between the self-assessed and observer-assessed presence and severity of colds. Social Science and Medicine, 1989, 29, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Maddox, G. L.Some correlates of differences in self-assessment of health status among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 1962, 17, 180–85.Google Scholar
12.Maddox, G. L.Self-assessment of health status. A longitudinal study of selected elderly subjects. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1964, 17, 449–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Maddox, G. L., & Douglas, E. B.Self-assessment of health: A longitudinal study of elderly subjects. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 1973, 14, 87–93.Google Scholar
14.Mossey, J. M., Shapiro, E.Self-rated health: A predictor of mortality among the elderly. American Journal of Public Health, 1982, 72, 800–08.Google Scholar
15.Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team. Subjective assessment of the effect of cataract surgery and a review of long term aims. Eye, 1987, 1, 247–53.Google Scholar
16.Suchman, E. A., Phillips, B. S., & Streib, G. F.An analysis of the validity of health questionnaires. Social Forces, 1958, 36, 223–32.Google Scholar
17.Visick, A. H.A study of the failures after gastrectomy. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons (Edinburgh), 1948, 3, 266–84.Google ScholarPubMed