Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T07:54:09.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Cancer-Registry Data for Technology Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

J. Haas  and
W. H. Mehnert
J. Haas
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the German Democratic Republic
W. H. Mehnert
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the German Democratic Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been suggested that efficacy and safety are the core issues for technology assessment in health care (1). To this must be added the issue of appropriateness (2). Efficacy remains the first issue nonetheless, for surely no one would knowingly evaluate the safety of an ineffective technology.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , February 1986 , pp. 311 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Banta, H. D. (ed.) Resources for health: Technology assessment for policy making. New York: Praeger, 1982.Google Scholar
2.Behney, C. J. & Bruer, J. T. Resource allocation, policy research and health policy: Four basic themes, in Banta, H. D. (ed.). Resources for Health: Technology Assessment for Policy Making. New York: Praeger, 1982, 216–29.Google Scholar
3.Hirayama, T., Waterhouse, J. A. H., & Fraumeni, J. F. Jr. Cancer risks by site. UICC Technology Report Series, Vol. 41, Geneva: International Union Against Cancer, 1980.Google Scholar
4.Kieser, R., Tanneberger, S. (ed.) Ethik in der Medizinischen Forschung – Bibliographie, No. 1 and 2. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften der D.D.R., 1983, 1984.Google Scholar
5.Kurihàra, M., Aoki, K., & Tominaga, S.Cancer mortality statistics in the world. Nagoya: University of Nagoya Press, 1984.Google Scholar
6.MacLennan, R., Muir, C., Steinitz, R., & Winkler, A.Cancer registration and its techniques. IARC Scientific Publications No. 21, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1978.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Office of Technology Assessment. Determining cancer risks from the environment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.Google Scholar
8.Staneczek, W., Rahu, M., Beckmann, L., Vyhandu, L., Haas, J., Aarelaid, T., & Mehnert, W. H.A comparative study of cancer registries in the German Democratic Republic and Estonian S.S.R. Arch. Geschwulstforsch, 1982, 52, 575–83.Google Scholar