Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:30:18.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcome Assessment in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Theresa Hoskins Michel
Theresa Hoskins Michel
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation outcome assessment has reflected the isolated concerns of different professionals, each addressing different factors of the problems of patients. Physical, medical, psychosocial, and epidemiological approaches have been taken. Discrepancies in findings may relate more to problems with assessment than to the technology itself, and can undermine the usefulness of the intervention.

Type
Special Section: Assessing The Technology Of Physical Therapy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 76 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Beck, A. T., Wad, C. H., Mendelson, M., et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1961, 4, 561–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bergner, L., Hallstrom, A. P., Berner, M., et al. Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls. American Journal of Public Health, 1985, 75,1321–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Blodgett, C., & Pekarik, G.Program evaluation in cardiac rehabilitation II: Outcome evaluation procedures. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1987, 7, 374–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bruce, R. A., & Hornsten, T. R.Exercise stress testing in evaluation of patients with ischemic heart disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Disease, 1969, 11, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Carson, P., Phillips, R., Lloyd, M., et al. Exercise after myocardial infarction: Controlled trial. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians, 1982, 16, 147–51.Google ScholarPubMed
6.DeBusk, R. F., Houston, N., Haskell, W., et al. Exercise training soon after myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 1979, 44, 1223–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Ehsani, A. A., Biello, D. R., Schultz, J., et al. Improvement of left ventricular contractile function by exercise training in patients with coronary heart disease. Circulation, 1986, 74, 350–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Erdman, R. A., & Duivenvoorden, H. J.Psychologic evaluation of a cardiac rehab program: A randomized trial in patients with myocardial infarction. Journal of Cardiac Rehabilitation, 1983, 3, 696–704.Google Scholar
9.Froelicher, V., Jensen, D., Genter, F., et al. A randomized trial of exercise training in patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984, 252, 1291–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Godin, G.The effectiveness of interventions in modifying behavioral risk factors of individuals with coronary heart disease. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1989, 9, 223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Greenland, P., & Chu, J.Efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation services. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1988, 109, 650–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hagberg, J. M., Ehsani, A. A., & Holloszy, J. O.Effect of 12 months of intense exercise training on stroke volume in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation, 1983, 67, 1194–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Hung, J., Gordon, E. P., Houston, N., et al. Change in rest and exercise myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function 3 to 26 weeks after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Effects of exercise training. American Journal of Cardiology, 1984, 54, 943–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Leon, A. S., Connett, J., Jacobs, D. R. Jr., & Rauramea, R.Leisure-time physical activity levels and risk of coronary heart disease and death. The multiple risk factor intervention trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 2388–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.MacPhillamy, D. J., & Lewinsohn, P. M.The pleasant events schedule. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Miller, N. H., Haskell, W. L., Berra, K., & DeBusk, R. F.Home versus group exercise training for increasing functional capacity after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1984, 70, 645–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.O’Connor, G. T., Buring, J. E., Yusuf, S., et al. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1989, 80, 234–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Oldridge, N., Guyatt, G., Fischer, M., & Rimm, A.Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988, 260, 945–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Paffenbarger, R. S., & Hyde, R. T.Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Preventive Medicine, 1984, 13, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Powell, K. E., Thompson, P. D., Caspersen, C. J., & Kendrick, J. S.Physical activity and the incidence of coronary heart disease. Annual Review of Public Health, 1987, 8, 253–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Stern, J. M., & Cleary, P.Psychosocial changes observed during a low level exercise program. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1981, 141, 1463–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Stern, J. M., & Cleary, P.The national exercise and heart disease project: Long-term psychosocial outcome. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1982, 142, 1093–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Stewart, A. L., Greenfield, S., Hays, R. D., et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 262, 907–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed