Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:25:10.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Randomized Controlled Trials in the Evaluation of Antenatal Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Murray W. Enkin
Murray W. Enkin
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Hamilton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many of the practices carried out during antenatal care improve the well-being of mother or baby and reduce the burden of adverse perinatal outcome. Other practices have either not been evaluated or have been shown to be ineffective. Evidence from randomized clinical trials provides the best evidence about the effectiveness of these practices.

Type
Methodological Considerations in the Evaluation of Antenatal Care Programs
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 40 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Chalmers, I. (ed.). Oxford database of perinatal trials. Oxford: Oxford Electronic Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
2.Crowley, P.Promoting pulmonary maturity. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. W., & Keirse, M.J.N.C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 746–64.Google Scholar
3.Crowther, C., & Chalmers, I. Bed rest and hospitalization during pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. W., & Keirse, M.j.n.c. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 625–28.Google Scholar
4.Goldstein, P. A., Sacks, H. S., & Chalmers, T. C. Hormone administration for the maintenance of pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. W., & Keirse, M.j.n.c. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 613–15.Google Scholar
5.Grant, A.Principles for clinical evaluation of methods of perinatal monitoring. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 12, 227-33.Google Scholar
6.Great Britain: Parliament, Social Services Committee. Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality. Second report of the Social Services Committee. London: H.M.S.O. vol. 1, 1980, 21.Google Scholar
7.Lumley, J., & Astbury, J. Advice for pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. W., & Keirse, M.j.n.c. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 242–47.Google Scholar
8.Mohide, P., & Keirse, M.J.N.C. Biophysical assessment of fetal well-being. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. W., & Keirse, M.j.n.c. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 485–88.Google Scholar
9.Smaill, F. Effects of antibiotics vs. no treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria. In Chalmers, I., (ed.), Oxford database of perinatal trials. Oxford: Oxford Electronic Publications, 1990.Google Scholar