Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:21:54.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small-for-Gestational-Age (SGA) Definitions and Associated Risks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Leiv S. Bakketeig  and
Per Magnus
Leiv S. Bakketeig
Affiliation:
National Institute of Public Health, Norway
Per Magnus
Affiliation:
National Institute of Public Health, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Samples and methods vary in constructing birthweight charts. Introduction of ultrasound dating affects the distribution of gestation, increases the proportion of preterm births, and reduces postterm and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births. The need for standardized charts is emphasized. Preferably such charts ought to be sex- and parity-specific, also taking into account the mother's previous pregnancy outcome in terms of birthweight. The risks associated with being bom SGA involve various morbidity as well as short- and long-term survival.

Type
Antenatal Screening for Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 139 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, H., Dallan Evans, T., & Bakketeig, L. S.Fagan test of infant intelligence: Visual recognition memory as an early measure of cognitive ability. Proceedings of the 12th Nordic Congress of Perinatal Medicine, Bergen, 1989.Google Scholar
2.Backe, B., Jacobsen, G., Bakketeig, L. S., & Bergsjø, P.Distribution and practice of diag nostic ultrasound in Norwegian obstetric institutions. The Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, 1987, 107, 471–73.Google Scholar
3.Bakketeig, L. S.Intrauterin tilveksthemning-er våre klassifikasjoner valide? Läkartidningen, 1989, 86, 1282–85.Google Scholar
4.Bakketeig, L. S., Bjerkedal, T., & Hoffman, H. J.Small-for-gestational age births in successive pregnancy outcomes: Results from a longitudinal study of births in Norway. Early Human Development, 1086, 14, 187–200.Google Scholar
5.Bakketeig, L. S., & Hoffman, H. J.The tendency to repeat gestational age and birth weight in successive births, related to perinatal survival. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1983, 62, 383–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bergsjø, P., Jacobsen, G., & Bakketeig, L. S.Organization of obstetrical ultrasound services in the Nordic counties. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1987, 66, 529–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Fitzhardinge, P. M., & Steven, E. M.The small for date infant. II. Neurological and intellectual sequelae. Pediatrics, 1972, 50, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Goldenberg, R. L., Cutter, G. R., Hoffman, H. J., et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: Standards for diagnosis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 161, 271–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Goldenberg, R. L., Davis, R., Cutter, G. R., et al. Prematurity, postdates and growth retardation: The influence of ultrasonography on reported gestational age. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 160, 462–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hagberg, B., Hagberg, G., & Zetterstöm, R.Decreasing perinatal mortality —Increase in cerebral palsy morbidity. Acta Pædiatrica Scandinavica, 1989, 78, 664–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Low, L. A., et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: A study of long-term morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 142, 670–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Neligan, G. A., Kolvin, I., Scott, D. M., & Garside, R. F.Born too soon or born too small. Clinics in Developmental Medicine, no. 61, 1976.Google Scholar
13.Nilson, S. T., et al. Males with low birthweight examined at 18 years of age. Acta Pædiatrica Scandinavica, 1984, 73, 168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ounsted, M., Moar, V. A., & Scott, A.Small-for-date babies, gestational age and developmental ability at 7 years. Early Human Development, 1989, 19, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Ounsted, M. K., et al. Children of deviant birthweight at the age of seven years: Health, handicap, size and development status. Early Human Development, 1984, 9, 323–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Parkinson, C. E., et al. School achievement and behavior of children who were small-for dates at birth. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1981, 23, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Parkinson, C. E., et al. Behavioral differences of school-age children who were small-for dates. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1986, 28, 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Rantakillio, P.A 14-year follow-up of children with normal and abnormal birth weight for their gestational age. A population study. Acta Pædiatrica Scandinavica, 1985, 74, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Skjærven, R., & Bakketeig, L. S.Classification of small-for-gestational age births: Weight by-gestation standards of second birth conditional on the size of the first. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1989, 3, 432–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Villar, J., et al. Heterogenous growth and mental development of intrauterine growth-retarded infants during the first 3 years of life. Pediatrics, 1984, 74, 783–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Vohr, B. R., et al. Growth and development in preterm infants small-for-gestational age. Journal of Pediatrics, 1983, 103, 941–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Walther, F. J.Growth and development of term disproportionate small-for-gestational age infants at the age of 7 years. Early Human Development, 1988, 18, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Wik, T., Markestad, T., Ahlsten, G., et al. Intrauterine growth retarded children: Follow-up at one year. Proceedings of the 12th Nordic Congress of Perinatal Medicine, Bergen, 1989.Google Scholar