No CrossRef data available.
The Social Costs of Inadequate Contraception
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2009
Abstract
This study examines, on a per-case basis, the social costs associated with contraceptive failures and resulting term pregnancies. To combat unintended pregnancy and escalating health care costs, the public sector needs to provide greater access to highly effective methods of contraception.
- Type
- General Essays
- Information
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Summer 1996 , pp. 487 - 497
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
REFERENCES
1.Administration for Children and Families. Characteristics and financial circumstances of AFDC recipients fiscal year 1991. Washington, DC: Office of Family Assistance, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 1993, 58.Google Scholar
2.Alan Guttmacher Institute. Contraceptive services: Facts in brief. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute, 03 15, 1993.Google Scholar
3.Alan Guttmacher Institute. Contraceptive use: Facts in brief. New York: Alan Guttmache Institute, 03 15, 1993.Google Scholar
4.Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T.Slipping into and out of poverty: The dynamics of spells. Journal of Human Resources. 1986, 21, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T.The Dynamics of dependency: The routes to self-sufficiency. Cambridge, MA: Urban Systems Research and Engineering, Inc. Office of Evaluation and Technical Analysis, Office of Income Security Policy, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 1983.Google Scholar
6.Food Stamp Program, USDA. Food stamp program: Food stamp resources, income, and benefits. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 10 1993.Google Scholar
7.Forrest, J. D.Epidemiology of unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994, 170, 1485–89.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Forrest, J. D., & Singh, S.Public-sector savings resulting from expenditures for contraceptive services. Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 22, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Gold, R. B., & Daley, D.Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1990. Family Planning Perspectives, 1991, 23, 204–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Harlap, S., Kost, K., & Forrest, J. D.Preventing pregnancy, protecting health: A new look at birth control choices in the United States. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1991.Google Scholar
11.Hatcher, R. A., Trussell, J., Stewart, F., et al. Contraceptive technology, 16th ed.New York: Irvington Publishers, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Health Care Financing Administration. Health care financing review/1992 annual supplement. Baltimore, MD: Office of Research and Demonstration, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 10 1993, 262, 265.Google Scholar
13.Mosher, W. D.Contraceptive practice in the U.S., 1982–1988. Family Planning Perspectives, 1990, 22, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Office of Analysis and Evaluation, USDA, Fiscal year 1992. WIC food package cost analysis: Estimated average monthly food package cost per participant in dollars. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 05 1993.Google Scholar
15.O’Neill, J. A., Bassi, L. J., & Wolf, D.The duration of welfare spells. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987, 69, 241–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Pavetti, L. A.The dynamics of welfare and work: Exploring the process by which women work their way off welfare. Malcolm Weiner Center for Social Policy, Working Papers: Dissertation Series (#D-93–1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 05 1993.Google Scholar
17.Rank, M. R. Exiting from welfare: A life-table analysis. Social Service Review, 1985, 358–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Rank, M. R.Family structure and the process of exiting from welfare. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1986, 48, 607–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Rank, M. R.Living on the edge: The realities of welfare in America. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Trussell, J., Leveque, J., Koenig, J., et al. The economic value of contraception: A comparison of 15 methods. American Journal of Public Health. 1995, 85, 494–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed