Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:45:20.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

APPLICATION OF A DIAGNOSTIC DECISION RULE IN CHILDREN WITH MENINGEAL SIGNS: A COST-MINIMIZATION STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2004

Rianne Oostenbrink
Affiliation:
Erasmus Medical Center
Jan B. Oostenbrink
Affiliation:
Erasmus Medical Center
Karel G. M. Moons
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Utrecht
Gerarda Derksen-Lubsen
Affiliation:
Juliana Children's Hospital
Diederick E. Grobbee
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Utrecht
W. Ken Redekop
Affiliation:
Erasmus Medical Center
Henriëtte A. Moll
Affiliation:
Erasmus Medical Center

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, we developed a diagnostic rule for the diagnosis and treatment of children with meningeal signs. This rule may provide the physician with a rationale to decide on the use of diagnostic and treatment procedures in these children and to improve their care. In this study, we estimated cost savings of the rule compared with current practice.

Methods: Routine care data of 360 children visiting the emergency department of the Sophia Children's Hospital with meningeal signs between 1988 and 1998 were used. Costs of diagnostic tests and treatment were estimated by using financial accounts of an academic and a general pediatric hospital. The number of procedures actually performed and the resulting cost estimates (i.e. unit costs×volume) were compared with the estimated figures after application of the decision rule.

Results: The population of children with meningeal signs comprised 99 with bacterial meningitis (27%), 36 with another serious bacterial infection (10%), and 225 with a self-limiting disease (63%). Application of the rule would reduce lumbar punctures by 12% and hospitalizations for empirical treatment by 15% with the same diagnostic accuracy as current practice. Cost savings were estimated at €292 per patient (relative reduction 10%) and were mainly achieved in the treatment course (€259).

Conclusions: A diagnostic decision rule for children with meningeal signs has the potential to improve the appropriate use of medical resources, to be cost-effective, and to ascertain the absence of bacterial meningitis earlier.

Type
RESEARCH NOTES
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch DA, Patton JP, Hershey JC. 1990 Knowing for the sake of knowing: The value of prognostic information. Med Decis Making. 10: 47- 57.Google Scholar
Bryant K, Marshall GS. 1999 Most cerebrospinal fluid cultures in children with bacterial meningitis are positive within two days. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 18: 732- 733.Google Scholar
Feigin RD, McCracken GH Jr. Klein JO. 1992 Diagnosis and management of meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 11: 785- 814.Google Scholar
Kassirer JP. 1989 Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. A cause of excessive testing. N Engl J Med. 320: 1489- 1491.Google Scholar
Lee GM, Gleisher GR, Harper MB. 2001 Management of febrile children in the age of the conjugate pneumococcal vaccine: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Pediatrics. 108: 835- 844.Google Scholar
Lieu TA, Ray GT, Black SB et al. 2000 Projected cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of healthy infants and young children. JAMA. 283: 1460- 1468.Google Scholar
Nigrovic LE, Chiang VW. 2000 Cost analysis of enteroviral polymerase chain reaction in infants with fever and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 154: 817- 821.Google Scholar
Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. 2000 Manual for cost evaluation, methods, guideline prices for economic evaluation in health care. [Handleiding voor kostenondezoek, methoden en richtlijnprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg]. Amstelveen, The Netherlands: College voor zorgverzekeringen
Oostenbrink R, Moons KGM, Donders ART, Grobbee DE, Moll HA. 2001 Prediction of bacterial meningitis in children with meningeal signs: Reduction of lumbar punctures. Acta Paediatr. 90: 611- 617.Google Scholar
Oostenbrink R, Moons KGM, Twijnstra MJ, Grobbee DE, Moll HA. 2002 Children with meningeal signs: Predicting who need empirical antibiotic treatment. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 156: 1189- 1194.Google Scholar
Oostenbrink R, Oostenbrink JB, Moons KGM, et al. 2002 Cost utility analysis of patient care in children with meningeal signs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 18: 485- 498.Google Scholar
Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. 1975 Therapeutic decision making: A cost-benefit analysis. N Eng J Med. 293: 229- 234.Google Scholar
Poley MJ, Stolk EA, Langemeijer RATM, Molenaar JC, Busschbach JJV. 2001 The cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery and subsequent treatment for congenital anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 36: 1471- 1478.Google Scholar
Rotbart HA. 1995 Enteroviral infections of the central nervous system. Clin Infect Dis. 20: 971- 81.Google Scholar