Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:39:39.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Community Interventions to Reduce Smoking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Judith Mackay  and
Ronald M. Davis
Judith Mackay
Affiliation:
Asian Consultancy on Tobacco Control
Ronald M. Davis
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Few major, community-based antismoking programs have undergone specific evaluation in developed countries; the number is even lower in developing countries. Yet not all evaluation need be elaborate, expensive, or overly time-consuming. Data on tobacco trade, import and export, taxation, mortality, and morbidity may already exist within government departments and can be used for evaluation. Published information from the tobacco industry may be obtained easily in trade journals and annual reports. Universities and international and overseas national health agencies may offer information, assistance, and expertise. Indirect evaluation of the importance of any particular antismoking intervention can be measured by how strongly the tobacco industry opposes that measure.

Type
Special Section: Assessment Of Preventive Technologies
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1991 , pp. 345 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. A $65,000 payout for smoking at work case. Press release from Action on Smoking and Health, Australia, 07 20, 1988.Google Scholar
2.Action on smoking and health. U.S.A. Smoking and Health Review, 1989, 19, 2.Google Scholar
3.Altman, D. G., Foster, V., Rasenick-Douss, L., & Tye, J. B.Reducing the illegal sales of cigarettes to minors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 261, 80–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Armstrong, B. K.Calling it quits. Medical Journal of Australia, 1986, 144, 337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Bjartveit, K., & Lund, K. E.Smoking control in Norway. National Council on Smoking and Health publication, Oslo, Norway: 11 1987, 4.Google Scholar
6.Brunnemann, K. D., & Hoffmann, D. Determination of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide in Philippino cigarettes. American Health Foundation, 04 12, 1988.Google Scholar
7.Cam Rungie & Associates Pty. Ltd. “Learning for Life” evaluation, 1988. Commissioned by Adelaide Central Mission, Inc.Google Scholar
8.Country Report: Malaysia. Presented at WHO Western Pacific Regional Working Group on Tobacco or Health, Tokyo, Japan: 11 4–6, 1987.Google Scholar
9.Cullingford, R., Da Cruz, L., Webb, S., et al. Legibility of health warnings on billboards that advertise cigarettes. Medical Journal of Australia, 1988, 148, 336–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Davis, R. M, & Kendrick, J. S.The Surgeon General's warnings in outdoor cigarette advertising: Are they readable? Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989,261,90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Daynard, R. A.Tobacco liability litigation as a cancer control strategy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988, 80, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.DiFranza, J. R., Norwood, B. D., Garner, D. W., et al. Legislative efforts to protect children from tobacco. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 257, 3387–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Donovan, R. J., & Fisher, D. An evaluation of Western Australia’s first Smoke Free Day. Paper presented at the Fifth World Conference on Smoking and Health, Winnipeg, Canada, 1983.Google Scholar
14.Dwyer, T., et al. Evaluation of the Sydney “Quit for Life” antismoking campaign. Part 2: Changes in smoking prevalence. Medical Journal of Australia, 1986, 144, 44–47.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Flay, B. R.Mass media and smoking cessation: A critical review. American Journal of Public Health, 1987, 77, 153–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Flay, B. R.Selling the smokeless society: Fifty-six evaluated mass media programs and campaigns worldwide. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1987.Google Scholar
17.Friedlander, D. H.Coronary heart disease prevention trials: What have they shown? Medical Progress, 1985, 126, 7–8.Google Scholar
18.Glynn, T. J.Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs: Research results. Journal of School Health, 1989, 59, 181–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Hamilton, J. L.The demand for cigarettes: Advertising, the health scare, and the cigarette advertising ban. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1972, 54, 401–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Hill, D.New cigarette-packet warnings: Are they getting through? (letter). Medical Journal of Australia, 1988, 148, 478–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. HOC Hansard 1988/89 Session. Vol. 144, Col 777W–78W, 01 13, 1989.Google Scholar
22.Hurt, R. D., Berge, K. G., Offord, K. P., et al. The making of a smoke-free medical center. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 261, 95–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Ledwith, F.The cost effectiveness of evaluation. In Smoking control: Strategies and evaluation in community and mass media programs. Workshop held in County Down, Northern Ireland, 06 26–27,1985,87–89. Published by the Health Education Authority, the Ulster Cancer Foundation, and the Scottish Health Education Group.Google Scholar
24.Lewit, E. M., Coate, D., & Grossman, M.The effects of government regulation on teenage smoking. Journal of Law and Economics, 1981, 24, 545–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Lubin, J. H., Blot, W. J., Berrino, F., et al. Modifying risk of developing lung cancer by changing habits of cigarette smoking. British Medical Journal, 1984, 288, 1953–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Mackay, J. M., & Barnes, G. T.Effects of strong government measures against tobacco in Hong Kong. British Medical Journal, 1986, 272, 1435–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Pierce, J. P., et al. Evaluation of the Sydney “Quit for Life” antismoking campaign. Part 1: Achievement of intermediate goals. Medical Journal of Australia, 1986, 144, 341–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Ramstrom, L. M.The Swedish program for smoking control — Current progress and future plans. In Ramstrom, L. M. (ed.), The smoking epidemic, a matter of worldwide concern. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1980.Google Scholar
29.Ramstrom, L. M. A case of lung cancer classified as occupational injury due to passive smoking at the workplace—A ruling by the Swedish Insurance Court of Appeal. Press release by National Smoking and Health Association, Sweden, 01 13, 1986.Google Scholar
30.Record tobacco compensation pay-out. Press release from Nonsmokers Movement of Australia, 11 18, 1986.Google Scholar
31.Reid, D. How effective were the 1984/85 UK No Smoking Days? In Smoking control: Strategies and evaluation in community and mass media programs. Workshop held in County Down, Northern Ireland, June 26-27, 1985, 57–60. Published by the Health Education Authority, the Ulster Cancer Foundation, and the Scottish Health Education Group.Google Scholar
32.Roemer, R. Recent developments in legislation to combat the world smoking epidemic. WHO/SMO/HLE/86, 1, 30.Google Scholar
33.Romano, R. M. Methods of evaluation and pretesting: Pretesting smoking messages. In Smoking control: Strategies and evaluation in community and mass media programs. Proceedings at a workshop held in County Down, Northern Ireland, 06 26-27, 1985, 75–81. Published by the Health Education Authority, the Ulster Cancer Foundation, and the Scottish Health Education Group.Google Scholar
34.Saito, R. Smoking among young women in Japan. In Aoki, M., Hisamichi, S., & Tominaga, S. (eds.), Smoking and health 1987. Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series 780. Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Smoking and Health, Tokyo, Japan, 11 9-12, 1987, 517–19.Google Scholar
35.Shean, R. E. Cough up an ad: An attempt to help inoculate children against cigarette ad- vertisements, 1988. Australian Council on Smoking and Health publication.Google Scholar
36.Simpson, D. Tobacco taxation. Paper presented at Shanghai Symposium on Smoking and Health, 11 14-15, 1987, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.Google Scholar
37.Tobacco Act. Victoria, Australia. Acts 1987, Number 81, 15–18.Google Scholar
38.Tominaga, S.Smoking and cancer patterns and trends in Japan. In Tobacco: A major health hazard (IARC Scientific Publications No. 74). Lyon, France: IARC, 1986, 103-13.Google Scholar
39.Townsend, J. Cost effectiveness. In Smoking control: Strategies and evaluation in community and mass media programs. Proceedings of workshop held in County Down, Northern Ireland, 06 26-27, 1985, 61–65. Published by the Health Education Authority, the Ulster Cancer Foundation, and the Scottish Health Education Group.Google Scholar
40.United States Department of Health and Human Services. Smoking programs for youth. NIH publication No. 80-2156. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1980.Google Scholar
41.United States Department of Health and Human Services. United States Surgeon General's 1989 Report: Reducing the health consequences of smoking. Washington, DC: U.S. Deparment of Health and Human Services, 1989, 586-88.Google Scholar
42.Walter, H. J., Vaughan, R. D., & Wynder, E. L.Primary prevention of cancer among children: Changes in cigarette smoking and diet after six years of intervention. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991, 83, 475-79.Google Scholar
43.Warner, K. E.Cigarette taxation: Doing good by doing well. Journal of Public Health Policy 1984, 5, 312-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Weng, X. Z., Hong, Z. G., & Chen, D. Y.Smoking prevalence in China aged 15 and above. China Medical Journal, 1987, 100, 886-92.Google Scholar
45.Wood, M. The N.I. World Cup Anti-Smoking Campaign. In Smoking control: Strategies and evaluation in community and mass media programs. Workshop held in County Down, Northern Ireland, 06 26-27, 1985, 51–56. Published by the Health Education Authority, the Ulster Cancer Foundation, and the Scottish Health Education Group.Google Scholar