Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:39:48.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BRINGING THE PATIENT BACK IN

Guidelines, Practice Variations, and the Social Context of Medical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2002

Ann Lennarson Greer
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
James S. Goodwin
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical Branch
Jean L. Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical Branch
Z. Helen Wu
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical Branch

Abstract

We challenge assumptions that have guided much research and policy aimed at understanding and reducing medical practice variation. Paramount is the focus on doctors as the cause of variation to the neglect of other possible influences. Some research literature suggests that patients, families, and the community context of practice may also influence treatment decisions. Failure to question present assumptions, despite weak evidence in support of them, may account for inability to explain persistent practice variation, develop appropriate implementable guidelines, or anticipate the effect on treatment decisions of greater patient involvement. In this paper, we discuss the weak response to the NIH Consensus Conference on early stage breast cancer because it may have reflected these problems. We urge a more complex and more empirical approach in explaining treatment choice and guidelines sensitive to the potential for value differences.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)