Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T08:00:19.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Budgeting Incentives for the Appropriate Use of Medical Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Duncan Neuhauser
Duncan Neuhauser
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Who Technology Assessment Proceedings
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 173 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Alban, A.Short-Stay units in hospitals: a Danish experience. Frederiksbeg County, Denmark, Working paper, 1984.Google Scholar
2.Anthony, R. N. & Herzlinger, R.Management control in non-profit organizations, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1975.Google Scholar
3.Bally, Y. W.Incentives for efficiency in the West German health care sector: the Bavarian experiment. Discussion Paper No. 04/82. Health Economics Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine and Political Economy, University of Alberdeen.Google Scholar
4.Bally, Y. W.Clinical budgeting in the NHS or going Dutch (Swedish, French). Discussion on Paper No. 05–82. Health Economics Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine and Political Economy, University of Alberdeen.Google Scholar
5.Bally, Y. W.Incentives for efficiency in the U.K. National Health Service. Discussion Paper No. 06/82. Health Economics Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine and Political Economy, University of Alberdeen.Google Scholar
6.Bauduret, J. F.Budget traditionnel et budget de programmes au Ministère de la Santé. Les Cahiers de la Sociologie et de Démographie Médicates, 1975, 2, 43–51.Google Scholar
7.Borgenhammer, E.Health care budgeting, goals structure, attitudes. Stockholm: The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, 1979.Google Scholar
8.Brandt, A., Horisberger, B. & Von Wartburg, W. P.Cost-sharing in health care. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
9.Brook, R. H., Ware, J. E., Rogers, W. H., et al. Does free care improve adults' health? New England Journal of Medicine, 1983, 309, 1426–34.Google Scholar
10.Cards, E., Neuhauser, D., & Stason, W.The physician and cost control. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager Gunn and Hain, Inc., 1979.Google Scholar
11.Chapalain, M. T.La rationalisation des choix budgétaires appliquée à la santé: techniques et methode d'etudes sectorielles. Revue Economique Santé, 1972, 1.Google Scholar
12.Chapalain, M. T. Perinatality: French cost-benefit studies and decisions on handicap and prevention. In Major mental handicap: methods and costs of prevention, Ciba Foundation Symposium 59. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Excerpta Medica/North Holland, 1978, 193–206.Google Scholar
13.Chapalain, M. T. A measurement of hospital care programs. In Alperovitch, A., De Dombal, F. T., & Grémy, F. (eds.), Evaluation of efficacy of medical action, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1979, 275–85.Google Scholar
14.Chapalain, M. T.Budgetary incentives in hospitals: a French experience. Working paper, Ministère des affaires sociales et de la solidarité nationale, Direction générale de la santé, Paris, France, 1984.Google Scholar
15.Chevallier, M. L'intérêt économique du traitement des scolioses par traction vertebrale de nuit. Bulletin de Statistiques Santé, Securité Socialé, 1974, 1A.Google Scholar
16.Chin, P. L. et al. Specialty budgeting: a pilot study carried out in East Cumbria Health District, Health Trends, 1981, 13, 22–25.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Clos i Matheu, J.Changing physicians' attitudes by information feedback: a Spanish experience. Working paper, Barcelona, Spain, 1984.Google Scholar
18.Cohen, D., Jones, P., Littenberg, B., & Neuhauser, D.Does cost information availability reduce physician test usage? A randomized clinical trial with unexpected findings. Medical Care, 1982, 20, 286–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Cohen, D., Littenberg, B., Wetzel, C. & Neuhauser, D.Improving physician compliance with preventative medicine guidelines. Medical Care, 1982, 20, 1040–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Cowan, D. H.Preferred Provider Organizations. Rockville, MD: Apsen Systems, 1984.Google Scholar
21.Flux, R. B.The effects of a management information system upon clinical resource allocation. Masters degree thesis, Department of Sociology, Brunei University, England, 1982.Google Scholar
22.Gargov, K. G.The economic approach to health services management: a Bulgarian experience, Working paper. Department of Social Hygiene, Institute of Social Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1984.Google Scholar
23.Gessner, U.Incentives in public and private hospitals: a Swiss experience. Working paper. Interdisciplinary Research Center for Public Health, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 1984.Google Scholar
24.Gibberd, F. B.The clinical accountable team. Health Trends, 1982, 14, 43–45.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Grimaldi, P. & Micheletti, J.DRG update: Medicare's prospective payment plan. Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press, 1983.Google Scholar
26.Grimaldi, P. & Micheletti, J.Prospective payment: the definitive guide to reimbursement, Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press, 1985.Google Scholar
27.Groner, P.Cost containment through employee incentive programs. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems, 1977.Google Scholar
28.Groot, L. M. J.Regional budgeting and the use of medical technology: a Dutch experience. Working paper, Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Netherlands, 1984.Google Scholar
29.Groot, L. M. J.Intramural health care budgeting. Effective Health Care, 1984, 2, 41.Google Scholar
30.Håkansson, S. DRG loonengen pa sjukvardens effektivitets problem? Lakartidningen, 1984.Google Scholar
31.Håkansson, S.Budget frames in county councils: a Swedish experience. Working paper, Swedish Planning and Rationalization Institute of the Health and Social Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, 1984.Google Scholar
32.Hartzke, L.DRGs: concept and use, Institute for Health Planning, 702 North Blackhawk Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, 08, 1983.Google Scholar
33.Health Research and Educational Trust of New Jersey. DRG evaluation. Vol. II, Economic and Financial Analysis 1984, Vol. Ill, Case-Mix Classification, Data and Management 1984, Vol. IVA, Political Evaluation 1983, Vol. IVB, Organizational Impact 1983. Princeton, NJ: Health Research and Educational Trust of New Jersey at the Center for Health Affairs.Google Scholar
34.Health and Social Security Department. Sharing resources for health in England—report of the Resource Allocation Working Party', London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1976.Google Scholar
35.Hermesse, J.Vers une budgétisation globale: une expérience beige, Working paper, Cabinet du Ministre des Affaires Sociales et des Reformes Institutionnelles, Bruxelles, Belgique, 1984.Google Scholar
36.Heyssel, R. M., Gaintner, J. R., Kues, I. W., Jones, A. A., & Llipstein, S. H.Decentralized management in a teaching hospital. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 310, 1477–80.Google Scholar
37.International Health Services Ltd. Prospective payment: what it is? How to cope? Concord, MA: International Health Services Ltd., 1983.Google Scholar
38.Kosanke, B.Statement on budgetary incentives for the appropriate use of technology. Working paper. Zentralinstitut fur die Kassenarztliche Versorgung Cologne, Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
39.Manning, W. G., Lerbowitz, A., Goldberg, G. A., et al. A controlled trial on the effect of a prepaid group practice on use of services. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 310, 1505–10.Google Scholar
40.Maynard, A.Budgeting in health care systems. Effective Health Care, 1984, 2, 41.Google Scholar
41.Merschbrock-Bauerle, A. & John, J. Financial incentives to physician behavior. In Eimeren, W. V., Engelbrecht, R., & Flagle, Ch. D. (eds.) Third international conference on system science in health care, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984, 999–1002.Google Scholar
42.Mooney, G.Programme budgeting: an aid to planning and priority setting in health care. Effective Health Care, 1984, 2, 65.Google Scholar
43.Neuhauser, D.Budgeting changes and experiments in the USA. Working paper, Medical School, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 1984.Google Scholar
44.Neuhauser, D., Cohen, D., et al. , Ongoing patient randomization for better health care. (Report of the First International Conference on Ongoing Patient Randomization, Cleveland, Ohio, October 23–24, 1984.) The Bulletin of the Cleveland Medical Library, 1985, 31, 5–7.Google Scholar
45.Newhouse, J. P., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N., et al. , Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. New England Journal of Medicine, 1981, 305, 1501–7.Google Scholar
46.Petersdorf, R. G.Progress report on hospital cost control in California. New England Journal of Medicine, 1983, 309, 254–56.Google Scholar
47.Roland, P.Delegation of budget authority to counties: a Norwegian experience. Working paper, More and Romsdal, Norway, 1984.Google Scholar
48.Schaaf, J. H.Budgettering in Ziekenhuizen. Medisch Contact, 1984, 2, 41–44.Google Scholar
49.Schaaf, J. H.Position and function of the medical staff concerning a hospital budgeting system: a Dutch experience. Working paper, Maria Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Netherlands, 1984.Google Scholar
50.Schrijvers, G.Regionalizatie En Financiering van de Engeles, Zweedse en Nederlandse Gezondheidszorg. Uitgeversmaatschappij De Tijdstroom Lochem-Poperinge, The Netherlands. 1980.Google Scholar
51.Schrijvers, G.Ziekenhuis en Budget Nederland; Engeland en Zweden. Uitgeversmaatschappij De Tijdstroom Lochem-Poperinge, The Netherlands, 1982.Google Scholar
52.Schrijvers, G.Regional health budgeting in Western Europe. Effective Health Care, 1984, 2, 57.Google ScholarPubMed
53.Schwefel, D.Budgetary incentives to change physicians' behavior: a Bavarian experience. Working paper, Institute for Medical Informatics of Health Services Research, MEDIS, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, 1984.Google Scholar
54.Schwefel, D., Zwerinz, K., & Leidl, R.Budgetary incentives to change physicians' behavior: the Bavarian experience. Working paper, Institute for Medical informatics of Health Services Research, MEDIS, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, 1984.Google Scholar
55.Soderstron, L.The Canadian health system, London: Crom Helm, 1978.Google Scholar
56.Van de Ven, P. M. M.Effects of cost sharing in health care. Effective Health Care, 1983, 1, 47–56.Google ScholarPubMed
57.Wennberg, J., Bunker, J. P., & Barnes, B.The need for assessing the outcome of common medical practices. Annual Review of Public Health, 1980, 1, 277–95.Google Scholar
58.Wickings, I., Davison, A., & Coles, J.Evaluating management information presented to clinically accountable teams, London: Brent Health District, 1975.Google Scholar
59.Wickings, I.Putting it together, the patient, the purse and the practice. Lancet, 1977, i; 239–40.Google Scholar
60.Wickings, I., Coles, J. M., Flux, R., & Howard, L.Review of clinical budgeting and costing experiments. British Medical Journal, 1983, i, 575–78.Google Scholar
61.Wickings, I.The results of six clinical budgeting experiments incorporating indirect incentives: a British experience. Working paper, Kings Fund College, London, United Kingdom, 1984.Google Scholar
62.Wickings, I. Is there a general theory for health care budgeting? Working paper, CASPE Research Unit, King's Fund, College, London, 1984. Effective Health Care, 1984, 2, 51.Google Scholar
63.World Health Organization. Study on physicians' use of technology. Report on a WHO planning meeting, The Hague, Netherlands, 06 29–30, 1981. WHO Copenhagen, ICP/RPD 801(1).Google Scholar
64.World Health Organization. Budgeting incentives for the appropriate use of medical technology. A conference held 10 8–10, 1984, Köln and Dusseldorf.Google Scholar