No CrossRef data available.
Case Study: Needs-Based Technology Assessment and Essential National Health Research: Experience in the Philippines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2009
Abstract
Essential national health research (ENHR) ensures that health research will be undertaken in priority areas defined by the people and will be used in decision making. Needs-based technology assessment (NBTA) is anchored on the ENHR philosophy. Two case studies are presented, one illustrating a successful application of NBTA and the other a failed approach. Reasons for the difference in success are examined.
- Type
- Special Section: Needs-Based Technology Assessment: Who Can Afford Not to Use It?
- Information
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Fall 1995 , pp. 695 - 699
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
1.Banta, D., & Behney, C.Policy formulation and technology assessment. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1981, 59, 445–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Center for Research and Communication. Philippine health care fact book. Manila, 1990.Google Scholar
4.Department of Health. Ten guiding policies of the Department of Health towards health in the hands of the people. Manila, 1993.Google Scholar
5.Feeny, D. New health technologies: Their effect on health and the cost of health care. In Feeny, D., Guyatt, G., & Tugwell, P. (eds.), Health care technology: Effectiveness, efficiency & public policy, Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1986, 5–24.Google Scholar
6.Health Intelligence Service, Department of Health. Philippine health statistics, 1989.Google Scholar
7.Solon, O., Gamboa, R., Schwartz, J. B., & Herrin, A.Health sector financing in the Philippines, Vol. II. National Health Accounts, 1991.Google Scholar