Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:39:00.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Internationalization of Health Technology Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Devidas Menon  and
Deborah Marshall
Devidas Menon
Affiliation:
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA)
Deborah Marshall
Affiliation:
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Health technology assessment as a formalized set of activities has a relatively short history. At its current stage of development, it is clear that it has global dimensions and impact. In this paper we review the history of health technology assessment, its development as a form of health services research, and its “institutionalization.” We then identify the reasons for its internationalization, review current international initiatives, and propose actions to be taken to improve cooperation among countries.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Banta, H. D., & Luce, B. R.Health care technology and its assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Banta, H. D., & Luce, B. R.Health care technology and its assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Battista, R. N., Banta, D. H., Jonsson, E. et al. Lessons from the eight countries. Health Policy, 1994, 30, 397–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Clark, E., & Marshall, D. (eds.) Technology assessment: National and international perspectives on research and practice. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for health technology assessment, 1992.Google Scholar
5.Cochrane, A. L.Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 20–25.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
7.Deber, R.Translating technology assessment into policy: Conceptual issues and tough choices. InternationalJournal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 131–37.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Drummond, M. F. Economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community: Future directions. In Drummond, M. F., Economic appraisal of health technology in th European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987, 147–52.Google Scholar
9.Fuchs, V. R., & Garber, A. M.The new technology assessment. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 673–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985, 70–79.Google Scholar
11.Lind, J. An inquiry into the nature, causes, and cure of the scurvy. In Buck, C., Llopis, A., Nájera, E., & Terris, M. (eds.). The challenge of epidemiology: Issues and selected readings. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organizations, 1988, 20–23.Google Scholar
12.Lomas, J.Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for child birth. Milbank Quarterly, 1993, 71, 439–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Perry, S., & Pillar, B.A national policy for health care technology assessment. Medical care Review, 1990, 47, 401–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Petitti, D.Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
15.Power, E. J., Tunis, S. R., & Wagner, J. L.Technology assessment and public health. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 1994, 15, 561–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Sachs, H. S.Berrier, J.Reitman, D. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 316, 450–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Simes, J.Meta-analysis: Its importance in cost-effectiveness studies. Medical Journal of Australia, 1990, 153(suppl.), 513–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Development of medical technology: Opportunities for assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office, 1976.Google Scholar
19.World Bank. World development report 1993: Investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, 134–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar