Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:31:06.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Health Care Effectiveness

Research and Policy Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Linda K. Demlo
Linda K. Demlo
Affiliation:
U.S. General Accounting Office
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The implications of effectiveness research are far-reaching. Thus, the specification of a broad research agenda and the soundness of the underlying research methodologies and data bases are critical. This article discusses the quality of administrative data and the infrastructure supporting an ongoing effectiveness research effort.

Type
Special Section: Measuring Health Care Effectiveness: Use of Large Data Bases for Technology and Quality Assessments
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , January 1990 , pp. 288 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Anderson, R. E., Hill, R. B., & Key, C. R.The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 261, 1610–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Blumberg, M. S.Comments on HCFA hospital death rate statistical outliers. Health Services Research, 1987, 21, 715–39.Google Scholar
3Brown, R. E., Sheingold, S. H., & Luce, B. R.Options for using practice guidelines in reducing the volume of medically unnecessary services. Washington, DC: Batelle Human Affairs Research Centers, 1989.Google Scholar
4California Medical Review, Inc. Final report: Premature discharge study. 12 10, 1986.Google Scholar
5Delaney, A. M., & Hsia, D.National DRG Validation Study. Lexington, MA: The Health Data Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
6Demlo, L. K., & Campbell, P. M.Improving hospital discharge data: Lessons from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Medical Care, 1981, 19, 1030–40.Google Scholar
7Federal Register, 54, 87 (May 8, 1989), 1970, 9–10.Google Scholar
8Hsia, D. C., Krushat, W. M., Fagan, A. B. et al. , Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 318, 352–55.Google Scholar
9Iezzoni, L. I., Burnside, S., Sickles, L. et al. , Coding of acute myocardial infarction: Clinical and policy implications. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1988, 109, 745–51.Google Scholar
10Iezzoni, L. I., & Moskowitz, M. A.Clinical overlap among medical diagnosis-related groups. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1986, 255, 927–29.Google Scholar
11Iezzoni, L. I.Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care: Pitfalls and potential of ICD-9-CM. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990, 6, 272–81.Google Scholar
12Institute of Medicine. Reliability of hospital discharge abstracts. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1977.Google Scholar
13Institute of Medicine. Reliability of Medicare hospital discharge records. Washington, DC:National Academy of Sciences, 1977.Google Scholar
14Institute of Medicine. Reliability of national hospital discharge survey data. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1980.Google Scholar
15Jencks, S. F., Williams, D. K., & Kay, T.Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data: The role of length of stay and comorbidities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988, 260, 2240–46.Google Scholar
16The medical care quality research and improvement act of 1989 (H.R. 1692). Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives 04 5, 1989.Google Scholar
17National Leadership Commission on Health Care. Technical Appendix III: Potential savings generated by the implementation of practice guidelines. In For the health of a nation: A shared responsibility. Report of the National Leadership Commission on Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press Perspectives, 1989.Google Scholar
18The patient outcomes research act of 1989 (S. 702). Introduced in the U.S. Senate 04 5, 1989.Google Scholar
19Schiff, G. D., & Yaacoub, A. S.The diagnostic coding of myocardial infarction. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1989, 110, 243.Google Scholar
20Uniform Clinical Data Set Taskforce. Uniform clinical data set study. Washington, DC: Health Care Financing Administration, 11 13, 1987.Google Scholar
21U.S. General Accounting Office/PEMD-88–10. Medicare: Quality of care assessment and assurance. Washington, DC: 1988, 76–77.Google Scholar
22Williams, S. E., & Latessa, P.Improving the quality of discharge data. Topics in Health Record Management, 1982, 2, 41–48.Google Scholar