Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:46:55.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

Christel Bahtsevani ,
Giggi Udén  and
Ania Willman
Christel Bahtsevani
Affiliation:
Malmö University, School of Health and Society
Giggi Udén
Affiliation:
Malmö University, School of Health and Society
Ania Willman
Affiliation:
Malmö University, School of Health and Society
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether evidence-based clinical practice in health care improves outcomes for patients, personnel, and/or organizations.

Methods: A systematic review of studies was conducted with various quantitative and qualitative methods up to the Spring of 2002. Protocols were used in quality assessment. Data synthesis is descriptive in a narrative form.

Results: Of 305 assessed articles, eight studies were included. The outcomes in the included studies were related to the experiences of patients and personnel and to organization concerning changed patient care and resource utilization. Because the included studies are heterogeneous in design, focus of research area, and scientific quality, the scientific foundation for the findings is weak. There is some support that evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, when put to use, improve outcomes (i) for patients—less likelihood of showing worsening of skin condition and disruption of skin condition improves more rapidly for infants; (ii) for personnel—support in daily work situation; and (iii) for organizations—decreased admission rates and length of stay, less resource utilization and reduced costs.

Conclusions: There is a need for further research as the findings are based on a rather limited number of studies. There is a tendency toward support for the idea that outcomes improve for patients, personnel, or organizations if clinical practice in health care is evidence-based, that is, if evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are used, although these findings could be specific to the settings and context of the studies reported in this systematic review.

Keywords

Evidence-based medicineProfessional practiceHealth careReview literature
Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 427 - 433
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al. 1998 Closing the gap between research and practice. An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 317: 465– 468.Google Scholar
Britton M. 2000 Så graderas en studies vetenskapliga bevisvärde och slutsatsernas styrka [Grading of level of evidence of studies and strength of recommendations] [in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 97 (40): 4414– 4415.Google Scholar
Button D, Roe B, Webb C, et al. 1998 Consensus guidelines for the promotion and management of continence by primary health care teams: Development, implementation and evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 27: 91– 99.Google Scholar
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 1998. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford: Available at: http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp. Accessed: September 10, 2003].
Dufault MA, Willey-Lessne C. 1999 Using a collaborative research utilization model to develop and test the effects of clinical pathways for pain management. J Nurs Care Qual. 13: 19– 33.Google Scholar
Effective Health Care. 1999 Getting evidence into practice. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The University of York, UK. 5 (1): 1– 16.
Flemming K. 1998 Asking answerable questions. Evidence Based Nurs. 1: 36– 37.Google Scholar
Giacomini M, Cook D, Guyatt G. 2002 Therapy and applying the results qualitative research. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, eds. Users' guides to the medical literature a manual for evidence-based clinical practice, vol. 1. Chicago: AMA Press: 433– 448.
Gray JAM. 1997. Evidence-based healthcare: How to make health policy and management decisions. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;
Grimshaw JM, Russel IT. 1993 Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review or rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 342: 1317– 1322.Google Scholar
Grol R. 1997 Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 315: 418– 421.Google Scholar
Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. 1998 Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. BMJ. 317: 858– 861.Google Scholar
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. 1993 Users' guides to the medical literature II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 270: 2598– 2601.Google Scholar
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. 1994 Users' guides to the medical literature II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 271: 59– 63.Google Scholar
Lund CH, Kuller J, Lane AT, et al. 2001 Neonatal skin care: Evaluation of the AWHONN/NANN research-based practice project on knowledge and skin care practices. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 30: 30– 40.Google Scholar
Lund CH, Osborne JW, Kuller J, et al. 2001 Neonatal skin care: Clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 30: 41– 51.Google Scholar
Manangan LP, Banerjee SN, Jarvis WR. 2000 Association between implementation of CDC recommendations and ventilator-associated pneumonia at selected US hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 28: 222– 227.Google Scholar
Marshall JL, Mead P, Jones K, Kaba E, Roberts AP. 2001 The implementation of venous leg ulcer guidelines: Process analysis of the intervention used in a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 10: 758– 766.Google Scholar
Oxman AD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. 1994 Users' guides to the medical literature VI. How to use an overview. JAMA. 272: 1367– 1371.Google Scholar
Perlstein PH, Kotagal UR, Bolling C, et al. 1999 Evaluation of an evidence-based guideline for bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 104: 1334– 1341.Google Scholar
Perlstein PH, Kotagal UR, Schoettker PJ, et al. 2000 Sustaining the implementation of an evidence-based guideline for bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 154: 1001– 1007.Google Scholar
Perlstein PH, Lichtenstein P, Cohen MB, et al. 2002 Implementing an evidence-based acute gastroenteritis guideline at a children's hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 28: 20– 30.Google Scholar
Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. 1997. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice & teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone;
SBU The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1999. Evidence based nursing caring for persons with schizophrenia. SBU/SSF-report No 4: Stockholm;
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2003. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2000. Available at: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50section6.pdf. Accessed: September 10,
Thomas L, Cullum N, McColl E, et al. 2002. Guidelines in professions allied to medicine (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software;
Tranmer JE, Kisilevsky BS, Muir DW. 1995 A nursing research utilization strategy for staff nurses in the acute care setting. J Nurs Adm. 25: 21– 29.Google Scholar
Willman A, Stoltz P. 2002. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad—en bro mellan forskning och klinisk verksamhet. [Evidence-based Nursing—a bridge between research and clinical practice] [in Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur;