Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T16:31:41.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PP120 Health Technology Assessment Framework To Capture The Full Value Of Value Added Medicines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

Value added medicines (VAM) are medicines based on known molecules that address healthcare needs and deliver relevant improvements for patients, healthcare professionals and/or payers through drug repositioning, drug reformulation or drug combination (1-3). Recently, the European Commission, through the Safe and Timely Access to Medicines for Patients (STAMP) program, considered the issue of VAM development and regulatory process. Current Health Technology Assessment (HTA) tools may not fully capture the benefits of VAM, which could lead to obstacles for patient access to VAM in several European countries (1). The study objective was to identify how HTA frameworks should evolve to reflect VAM value.

METHODS:

HTA expert interviews were performed as a preparatory step to an advisory board meeting. The following topics were addressed: (i) Eligibility for HTA and early HTA dialogues; (ii) Attributes that should be considered in HTA; (iii) HTA methodology; and (iv) Involvement of stakeholders in HTA.

RESULTS:

VAMs bring additional benefit to patients and society. Therefore, the possibility for VAM assessment on a voluntary basis and within the appropriate assessment patterns/tools should be, in principle, included into HTA frameworks, as well as into early HTA dialogues. HTA should be patient-centric, and attributes such as patient preference, adherence, and patient reported outcomes should be considered where relevant. Unmet patient needs and disease burden should be used in a transparent and reproducible deliberative process. All these attributes should be used as explicitly and meaningfully weighted appraisal modifiers. HTA methodology should be comprehensive and should integrate societal perspectives. Patient representatives should take part in the decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current HTA frameworks should evolve to enhance VAM value recognition and encourage industry investment in medicines with high potential value for society.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

REFERENCES:

1. Toumi, M, Rémuzat, C. Value added medicines: What value repurposed medicines might bring to society? J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5 (1):1264717.Google Scholar
2. Murteira, S, Ghezaiel, Z, Karray, S, Lamure, M. Drug reformulations and repositioning in pharmaceutical industry and its impact on market access: reassessment of nomenclature. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2013 Aug 6;1. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v1i0.21131.Google Scholar
3. Dudley, J, Berliocchi, L. Drug Repositioning: Approaches and Applications for Neurotherapeutics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.Google Scholar