Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:59:41.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preventing and Managing Prematurity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Judith Lumley
Judith Lumley
Affiliation:
Monash University, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the past decade the prevention and management of prematurity have begun to be addressed with more appropriate designs. A few strategies—very few—can now be recommended. A few, some widely implemented, can be abandoned. The risks and benefits of most interventions still require clarification.

Type
Special Section: Obstetric Technology: A Future Perspective
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1991 , pp. 460 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Alexander, S., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. Formal risk scoring during pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989, 221–36.Google Scholar
2.Andersen, H. F., Freda, M. C., Damus, K., et al. Effectiveness of patient education to reduce preterm delivery among ordinary risk patients. American Journal of Perinatology, 1989, 6, 214–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Bell, R.The prediction of preterm labour by recording spontaneous antenatal uterine activity. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983, 90, 884–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bell, R., & Lumley, J.Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption by pregnant women in Victoria. Community Health Studies, 1989, 14, 484–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Broadhead, W. E., Kaplan, B. H., James, S. A., et al. The epidemiologic evidence for a relationship between social support and health. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1983, 117, 521–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bryce, R., & Stanley, F. Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of social support in pregnancy. Joint meeting of the Australian Perinatal Society and the Australasian Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy, Thredbo, Australia, 12 1988.Google Scholar
7.Buescher, P. B., Meis, P. J., Ernest, P. M., et al. A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention program in a North Carolina perinatal care region. American Journal of Public Health, 1988, 78, 264–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Casey, M. L., & MacDonald, P. C.Biomolecular processes in the initiation of parturitional decidual activation. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988, 31, 533–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Chapman, J., Siegel, E., & Cross, A.Home visitors and child health: Analysis of selected programs. Pediatrics, 1980, 85, 1059–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Clapp, J. F., & Dickstein, S.Endurance exercise and pregnancy outcome. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1984, 16, 556–62.Google Scholar
11.Committee to study the prevention of low birth weight, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. Preventing low birth weight. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
12.Covington, D. L., Carl, J., Daley, J. G., et al. Effects of the North Carolina Prematurity Prevention Program among public patients delivering at New Hanover Memorial Hospital. American Journal of Public Health, 1988, 78, 1493–95.Google Scholar
13.Creasy, R. K. Current status of preterm birth prevention in the USA. Presented at the Asia-Oceania Perinatal Societies, Perth, Western Australia, 1990.Google Scholar
14.Crowley, P. Promoting pulmonary maturity. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989, 746–64.Google Scholar
15.Crowther, C., & Chalmers, I. Bed rest and hospitalization during pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989, 624–32.Google Scholar
16.Crowther, C., Verkuyl, D., Ashworth, F., et al. Bed rest for hypertension or multiple pregnancy—Is it worthwhile? (abstract). Proceedings of the Seventh Congress, Australian Perinatal Society, Adelaide, South Australia, 10 1989.Google Scholar
17.Crowther, C. A., Neilson, J. P., Verkuyl, D. A. A., et al. Preterm labour in twin pregnancies: Can it be prevented by hospital admission? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989, 96, 850–53.Google Scholar
18.Dawson, P., Van Doorninck, W. J., & Robinson, J. L.Effects of home-based informal social support on child health. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 1989 10, 63–67.Google Scholar
19.Eastman, N. T.Prematurity from the viewpoint of the obstetrician. American Practitioner, 1947, 1, 343.Google Scholar
20.Ershoff, D. H., Mullen, P. D., & Quinn, V. P.A randomised trial of a serialised self-help smoking cessation program for pregnant women in an HMO. American Journal of Public Health, 1989, 79, 182–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Freda, M. C., Damus, K., Andersen, H. F., et al. A “PROPP” for the Bronx: Preterm birth prevention in the inner city. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 76, 93S–96S.Google Scholar
22.Garcia, J., Blondel, B., & Saurel-Cubizolles, M. J. The needs of childbearing families: Social policies and the organization of health care. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1. Oxford: U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989, 205–20.Google Scholar
23.Goldenberg, R. L., Davis, R. O., Cooper, R. L., et al. The Alabama preterm birth prevention project. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 75, 933–39.Google Scholar
24.Goldenberg, R. L., Davis, R. O., Cutter, G. R., et al. Prematurity, postdates and growth retardation. The influence of the use of ultrasonography on reported gestational age. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 160, 462–70.Google Scholar
25.Gortmaker, S., Sobol, A., Clark, C., et al. The survival of very low-birthweight infants by level of hospital of birth: A population study of perinatal systems in four states. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985, 152, 517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Herron, M., Katz, M., & Creasy, R. K.Evaluation of a preterm birth prevention program: Preliminary report. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 59, 452–56.Google Scholar
27.Heins, H. C., Nance, N. W., & Ferguson, J. E.Social support in improving perinatal outcome: The resource mothers program. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 70, 263–66.Google Scholar
28.Heins, H. C., Nance, N. W., McCarthy, B. J., & Efird, C. M.A randomized trial of nursemidwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 75, 341–45.Google Scholar
29.Hill, W. C., Fleming, A. D., Martin, R. W., et al. Home uterine activity monitoring is associated with a reduction in preterm birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 76, 13S–18S.Google Scholar
30.Holbrook, R. H., Laros, R. K., & Creasy, R. K.Evaluation of a risk scoring system for prediction of preterm labor. American Journal of Perinatology, 1989, 6, 62–68.Google Scholar
31.Horwood, S. P., Boyle, M. H., Torrance, G. W., & Sinclair, J. W.Mortality and morbidity of 500 to 1499 g birthweight infants live-born to residents of a defined geographic region before and after neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics, 1982, 69, 613–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.lams, J.Obstetric inertia: An obstacle to the prevention of prematurity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988, 159, 796–99.Google Scholar
33.lams, J.Current status of prematurity prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 262, 265–66.Google Scholar
34.lams, J. D., Johnson, F. F., & Creasy, R. K. Preliminary report of a prospective random trial of a preterm birth prevention program (abstract). Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 02 1985.Google Scholar
35.lams, J. D., Johnson, F. F., & O’Shaughnessy, R. W.A prospective random trial of home uterine activity monitoring in pregnancy among women at increased risk of preterm labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988, 159, 595–603.Google Scholar
36.lams, J. D., Peaceman, A. M., & Creasy, R. K.Prevention of prematurity. Seminars in Perinatology, 1988, 12, 280–91.Google Scholar
37.Jonas, E. G.The value of prenatal bed rest in multiple pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 1963, 70, 461–64.Google Scholar
38.Keirse, M. J. N. C.Progestogen administration in pregnancy may prevent preterm delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97, 149–54.Google Scholar
39.Keirse, M. J. N. C., Grant, A., & King, J. F. Preterm labour. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989, 694–745.Google Scholar
40.Klebanoff, M. A., Shiono, P. H., & Rhoads, G. G.Outcomes of pregnancy in a national sample of resident physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 1040–45.Google Scholar
41.Knuppel, R. A., Lake, M. F., Watson, D. L., et al. Preventing preterm birth in twin gestation: Home uterine activity monitoring and perinatal nurse support. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 76, 24S–27S.Google Scholar
42.Knuppel, R. A., Lake, M. F., Watson, D. L., et al. The contribution of symptomatology and/or uterine activity to the incidence of unscheduled visits. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 76, 28S–31S.Google Scholar
43.Konte, J. M., Creasy, R. K., & Laros, R. K.California North Coast Preterm Birth Prevention Project. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988, 71, 727–30.Google Scholar
44.Launer, L. J., Villar, J., Kestler, E., & De Onis, M.The effect of maternal work on fetal growth and duration of pregnancy: A prospective study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Leeper, J. D., Nagy, C., & Hullett, S. The Rural Alabama Pregnancy and Infant Health (RAPIH) Program. Presented at the American Public Health Association meeting, Boston, MA. 1988 [cited in Chapman et al., ref. 9].Google Scholar
46.Lumley, J.Stopping smoking. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987, 94, 289–94.Google Scholar
47.Lumley, J.The prevention of preterm birth: Unresolved problems and work in progress. Australian Paediatric Journal, 1988, 24, 101–11.Google ScholarPubMed
48.Lumley, J., & Astbury, J. Advice for pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989, 237–54.Google Scholar
49.Lumley, J., Kitchen, W. H., Roy, R. N. D., et al. The survival of extremely-low-birthweight infants in Victoria: 1982–1985. Medical Journal of Australia, 1988, 149, 242–46.Google Scholar
50.Lumley, J., Kitchen, W. H., Roy, R. N. D., et al. Method of delivery and resuscitation of very low birthweight infants in Victoria: 1982–1985. Medical Journal of Australia, 1990, 152, 143–46.Google Scholar
51.Lumley, J., Lester, A., Renou, P., & Wood, C.A failed RCT to determine the best method of delivery for very low birth weight infants. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1985, 6, 120–27.Google Scholar
52.MacLennan, A., Green, R., O'Shea, R., et al. An RCT of the value of routine hospitalisation in twin pregnancy between 26 and 30 weeks gestation. Lancet, 1990, 335, 267–69.Google Scholar
53.Main, D. M., & Gabbe, S. G.Risk scoring for preterm labor. Where do we go from here? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 157, 789–93.Google Scholar
54.Main, D. M., Gabbe, S. G., Richardson, D., & Strong, S.Can preterm deliveries be prevented? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985, 151, 892–98.Google Scholar
55.Main, D. M., Katz, M., Chin, G., et al. Intermittent weekly contraction monitoring to predict preterm labor in low risk women: A blinded study. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988, 72, 757–61.Google ScholarPubMed
56.Main, D. M., Richardson, D., Gabbe, S. G., et al. Prospective evaluation of a risk scoring system for predicting preterm delivery in black inner city women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 69, 61–66.Google Scholar
57.Main, D. M., Richardson, D. K., Hadley, C. B., & Gabbe, S. G.Controlled trial of a preterm labor detection program: Efficiency and costs. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 74, 873–77.Google Scholar
58.Malloy, M. H., Rhoads, G. G., Schramm, W., & Land, G.Increasing cesarean section rates in very low birth weight infants: Effect on outcome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 262, 1475–78.Google Scholar
59.Mamelle, N., Bertucal, I., Auray, J. P., & Duru, G.Quelles mesures de prévention de la prematurité en mileu professionel? Revue Epidémiologie et Santé Publique, 1986, 34, 286–93.Google Scholar
60.Mamelle, N., Laumon, B., & Lazar, P.Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1984, 119, 309–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61.McDonald, A. D., McDonald, J. C., Armstrong, B., et al. Prematurity and work in pregnancy. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1988, 45, 56–62.Google Scholar
62.McGregor, J. A.Prevention of preterm births. New initiatives based on microbial-host interactions. Obstetric and Gynecologic Survey, 1988, 43, 1–14.Google Scholar
63.Meis, P. J., Ernest, J. M., Moore, M. L., et al. Regional program for prevention of premature birth in northwestern North Carolina. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 157, 550–56.Google Scholar
64.Meyer, M. B. Effects of maternal smoking and altitude on birth weight and gestation. In Reed, D. M. & Stanley, F. J. (eds.), The epidemiology of prematurity. Baltimore, MD: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1977, 81–104.Google Scholar
65.Milner, R. A., Enkin, M. W., & Mohide, P. T.The importance of clinical trials of preterm labor. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984, 27, 606–13.Google Scholar
66.Morrison, J. C., Martin, J. N., Maryin, R. W., et al. Prevention of preterm birth by ambulatory assessment of uterine activity. A randomized study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 156, 536–43.Google Scholar
67.Mortenson, O. A., Franklin, J., Löfstrand, T., & Svanberg, B.Prediction of preterm birth. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1987, 66, 507–12.Google Scholar
68.MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Interim report of the MRC/RCOG multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988, 95, 437–55.Google Scholar
69.Mueller-Heubach, E., & Guzick, D.Evaluation of risk scoring in a preterm birth prevention study of indigent patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 160, 829–37.Google Scholar
70.Mueller-Heubach, E., Reddick, D., Bennett, B., & Beute, R.Preterm birth prevention: Evaluation of a prospective controlled randomised trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 160, 1172–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71.Oakley, A.Social support: The “soft” way to improve birth weight? Social Science and Medicine, 1985, 21, 1259–68.Google Scholar
72.Oakley, A., Rajan, L., & Grant, A.Social support and pregnancy outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73.Ohlsson, A.Treatments of preterm premature rupture of the membranes: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 160, 890–906.Google Scholar
74.Olds, D. L., Hehderson, C. R., Tatelbaum, R., & Chamberlin, R.Improving the delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: A randomized trial of nurse some visitation. Pediatrics, 1986, 77, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75.Olds, D. L., & Kitzman, H.Can home visitation improve the health of women and children at environmental risk? Pediatrics, 1990, 86, 108–16.Google Scholar
76.Orleans, M., & Haverkamp, A. D.Are there health risks in using risking systems? The case of perinatal risk assessment. Health Policy, 1987, 7, 297–307.Google Scholar
77.Paneth, N., Kiely, J. L., Wallenstein, S., et al. Newborn intensive care and neonatal morbidity in low birth-weight infants: A population study. New England Journal of Medicine, 1982, 307, 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78.Paneth, N., Kiely, J. L., Wallenstein, S., & Susser, M.The choice of place of delivery. Effect of hospital level on mortality in all singleton births in New York City. American Journal of the Diseases of Children, 1987, 141, 60–64.Google Scholar
79.Papiernik, E.Proposals for a programmed prevention policy of preterm birth. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984, 27, 614–35.Google Scholar
80.Porto, M., Nageotte, M. P., Hill, O., et al. The role of home uterine activity monitoring in the prevention of preterm birth (abstract #96). Proceedings of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 7th Annual Meeting, Florida, U.S.A., 02 1987.Google Scholar
81.Powell, T. G., & Pharoah, P. O. D.Regional neonatal intensive care: Bias and benefit. British Medical Journal, 1987, 293, 690–92.Google Scholar
82.Powers, W. F., & Miller, T. C.Bed rest in twin pregnancy: Identification of a critical period and its cost implications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979,134,23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83.Rabkin, C. S., Anderson, H. R., Bland, J. M., et al. Maternal activity and birthweight: A prospective, population-based study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1990,131,522–31.Google Scholar
84.Romero, R., Oyarzun, E., Mazor, M., et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 73, 576–82.Google Scholar
85.Romero, R., Wu, Y. K., Brody, D. T., et al. Human decidua: A source of interleukin-1. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 73, 31–34.Google ScholarPubMed
86.Rush, R. W., Davey, D. A., & Segall, M. L.The effect of preterm delivery on perinatal mortality. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978, 85, 806–11.Google Scholar
87.Rush, R. W., Keirse, M. J. N. C., Howat, P., et al. Contribution of preterm delivery to perinatal mortality. British Medical Journal, 1976, 2, 965–68.Google Scholar
88.Schoonmaker, J. N., Lawellin, D. W., Lunt, B., & McGregor, J. A.Bacteria and inflammatory cells reduce chorioamniotic membrane integrity and tensile strength. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 74, 590–96.Google Scholar
89.Scott, K. E.Reducing low birth weight by enhanced perinatal care. Pediatric Research, 1984, 18(pt.2). 345A.Google Scholar
90.Shiono, P. N., Klebanoff, M. A., & Rhoads, G. G.Smoking and drinking during pregnancy: Their effects on preterm birth. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1986, 255, 82–84.Google Scholar
91.Spencer, B., Thomas, H., & Morris, J.A randomised controlled trial of the provision of a social support service during pregnancy: The South Manchester Family Worker Project. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989, 96, 281–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92.Spira, N., Audras, F., Chapel, A., et al. Surveillance à domicile des grossesses pathologique par les sage-femmes. Essai comparatif controlé sur 996 femmes. Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 1981, 10, 543–48.Google Scholar
93.St. Leger, A. S., Allen, D., & Rowsell, K. V.Procedures for evaluating innovatory proposals. British Medical Journal, 1989, 299, 1017–18.Google Scholar
94.Taslimi, M. M., Sibai, B. M., Amon, E., et al. A national survey on preterm labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 160, 1352–60.Google Scholar
95.Trudinger, B. J., & Boshell, L.A survey of the management of preterm labour by Australian obstetricians. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987, 27, 188–95.Google Scholar
96.Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., Verwey, R. A., Ebeling, M. C. A., et al. Mortality in very preterm and very low birth weight infants according to place of birth and level of care: Results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in the Netherlands. Pediatrics, 1988, 81, 404–11.Google Scholar
97.Watson, D. L., Welch, R. A., Mariona, F. G., et al. Management of preterm labor patient at home: Does daily uterine activity monitoring and nursing support make a difference? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 76, 32S–35S.Google Scholar
98.Windsor, R. A., & Orleans, C. T.Guidelines and methodological standards for smoking cessation research among pregnant women: Improving the science and art. Health Education Quarterly, 1986, 13, 131–61.Google Scholar
99.Yawn, B. P., & Yawn, R. A.Preterm birth prevention in a rural practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 262, 230–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar