Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:04:36.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of real-world data and evidence for medical devices: a qualitative study of key informant interviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2020

Julie Polisena Open the ORCID record for Julie Polisena [Opens in a new window]  and
Gayatri Jayaraman
Julie Polisena*
Affiliation:
Health Product Surveillance and Epidemiology Bureau, Marketed Health Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, 200 Eglantine Driveway, Ottawa, OntarioK1A 0K9, Canada International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering – Health Technology Assessment Division, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Gayatri Jayaraman
Affiliation:
Health Product Surveillance and Epidemiology Bureau, Marketed Health Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, 200 Eglantine Driveway, Ottawa, OntarioK1A 0K9, Canada School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, OntarioK1N 6N5, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Julie Polisena, E-mail: julie.polisena@canada.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Health Canada is committed to the modernization of the use of real-world data (RWD) and evidence (RWE) to support regulatory decisions. As such, telephone interviews with stakeholders, including government decision makers, health technology assessment (HTA) producers, industry, and patients, to understand their experiences with and perspectives on how to enhance RWE use for medical devices were performed.

Methods

Thirty-four semi-structured telephone interviews with forty key informants were conducted. Transcripts were reviewed independently by one individual to identify, define, and categorize key concepts and were verified by a second reviewer.

Key Findings

There are expectations for Health Canada to provide a framework and guidance on RWE use, identify relevant outcomes for data collection and criteria for data quality, conduct post-market surveillance more systematically, and partner with HTA organizations to develop methods for RWE generation. Stakeholders interviewed support the RWE use for regulatory decisions and HTA recommendations. Moreover, robust scientific methods for RWE generation will be critical to ensure that relevant questions are asked and rigorous statistical analyses are done to answer them. Patients are likely to consent to share their anonymized or de-identified medical information for nonprofit purposes.

Conclusions

Key concepts from the interviews centered on the current and future RWE use for medical devices, considerations for the organizational, medical, scientific, and legal aspects and privacy issues of RWD collection or RWE generation, and options to implement the use of RWD and RWE. Our study findings will help inform the development of an RWE framework for regulatory decisions and HTA recommendations.

Keywords

Real-world dataReal-world evidenceMedical devicesQualitative research
Type
Policy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2020 , pp. 579 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Health Canada. Canada's Health Care Sytem. Government of Canada; 2018 [cited 2018 July]; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-care-system/reports-publications/health-care-system/canada.html.Google Scholar
Health Canada. Medical device real-world data and evidence in Canada: An environmental scan highlights [cited 2020 Oct 23]; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/transparency/regulatory-transparency-and-openness/improving-review-drugsdevices/real-world-evidence-medical-device-strategy/environmental-scan.htmlGoogle Scholar
Health Canada. Health Canada's action plan on medical devices: continuously improving safety, effectiveness and quality; 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 4]; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/drugs-health-products/medical-devices-action-plan.html.Google Scholar
Health Canada. Real-world data and evidence for medical devices: an environmental scan highlights [cited 2020 Mar 11]; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/transparency/regulatory-transparency-and-openness/improving-review-drugs-devices/real-world-evidence-medical-device-strategy/environmental-scan.html.Google Scholar
Health Canada. A strategy to optimize the use of real-world evidence across the medical device life cycle [cited 2020 Mar 11]; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/transparency/regulatory-transparency-and-openness/improving-review-drugs-devices/real-world-evidence-medical-device-strategy.html.Google Scholar
Strauss, A, Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
Butterfield, L, Borgen, W, Amundson, N, Maglio, A. Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qual Res. 2005;5:475–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, C, Ziebland, S, Mays, N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320:114–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, C, Silverstain, L. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
Health Canada. Protecting Canadians from unsafe drugs act (Vanessa's law); 2014 [cited 2019 Jan 4]; Available from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/AnnualStatutes/2014_24/page-1.html.Google Scholar
National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center. About us [cited 2020 Aug 26]; Available at: https://nestcc.org/about/about-us/.Google Scholar
EUNetHTA. Work Package 4 Joint production of health technology assessments “other technologies” WP4 Co-Lead Partner: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute-Health Technology Assessment [cited 2020 Aug 26]; Available at: https://eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/WS2_Documentation_25.06.2019pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
Facey, K, Rannaheimo, P, Batchelor, L, Borchardt, M, de Cock, J. Real-world evidence to support Payer/HTA decisions about highly innovative technologies in the EU - actions for stakeholders. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020:1–10. doi:10.1017/S026646232000063X.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanavos, P, Angelis, A, Drummond, M. An EU-wide approach to HTA: an irrelevant development or an opportunity not to be missed? Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:329–32. doi:10.1007/s10198-019-01037-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oortwijn, W, Sampietro-Colom, L, Trowman, R. How to deal with the inevitable: generating real-world data and using real-world evidence for HTA purposes – from theory to action. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35:346–50. doi:10.1017/S0266462319000400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CADTH . The use of real-world evidence for medical device assessments - an environmental scan. Ottawa: CADTH; 2019 (Environmental scan; no. 91) [cited Aug 26 2020]; Available from: https://cadth.ca/sites/default/files/es/es0344-use-of-real-world-evidence-for-med-dev-assessment.pdf.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Polisena and Jayaraman supplementary material

Polisena and Jayaraman supplementary material

Download Polisena and Jayaraman supplementary material(File)
File 54.1 KB