Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:58:36.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using EQ-5D in children with asthma, rheumatic disorders, diabetes, and speech/language and/or hearing disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Daniëlle C. M. Willems ,
Manuela A. Joore ,
Fred H. M. Nieman ,
Johan L. Severens ,
Emiel F. M. Wouters  and
Johannes J. E. Hendriks
Daniëlle C. M. Willems
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Manuela A. Joore
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Fred H. M. Nieman
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Johan L. Severens
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Emiel F. M. Wouters
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Johannes J. E. Hendriks
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores several variables of the EQ-5D child version, a multi-attribute utility instrument, in children with chronic conditions.

Methods: A convenience sample was selected from hospital outpatient records and school records. The sample included children aged 7–18 years with the following chronic conditions: asthma, rheumatic disorders, diabetes, and speech/language and/or hearing disorders. The practicality, convergent validity, and discriminant power were compared with a generic quality of life questionnaire for children (TACQOL) and the 2-week test–retest reliability was assessed.

Results: A total of 182 children or their parents completed the first questionnaire and 161 children/parents completed both questionnaires. The practicality of the EQ-5D was good. Low to moderate correlations were found between the utilities and VAS scores and the TACQOL scales. The discriminant power of the EQ-5D items was low overall and was greater for children with a rheumatic disorder than for children with the other conditions. In the subset of children who experienced no health change between the test and the retest, the reliability of the EQ-5D was moderate to high.

Conclusions: The EQ-5D seems suitable for children, although the use of an additional disease-specific questionnaire is still recommended. The EQ-5D seems the most suitable for children with a chronic physical condition and appears to be reliable for children with a stable health status.

Keywords

EQ-5DChildChronic diseaseQuality of lifeReliability and validity
Type
Research Reports
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 391 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Apajasalo, M, Rautonen, J, Holmberg, C, Sinkkonen, J. Quality of life in pre-adolescence: A seventeen-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:532–538.Google Scholar
2. Apajasalo, M, Sintonen, C, Holmberg, C, Sinkkonen, J. Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:205–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Baan, CA, Hutten, JB, Rijken, PM, (red.) Afstemming in de zorg: een achtergrondstudie naar de zorg voor mensen met een chronische aandoening [in Dutch]. RIVM rapport 282701005; 2003.Google Scholar
4. Brooks, R. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72.Google Scholar
5. Dolan, P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095–1108.Google Scholar
6. Dolan, P, Shaw, R, Tsuchiya, A, Williams, A. QALY maximisation and people's preferences: A methodological review of the literature. Health Econ. 2005;14:197–208.Google Scholar
7. Drummond, MF, Sculpher, MJ, Torrance, GW, O'Brien, BJ, Stoddart, GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
8. Eiser, C, Morse, R. Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–157.Google Scholar
9. Feeny, D, Furlong, W, Barr, RD, Torrance, GW, Rosenbaum, P, Weitzman, S. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:923–928.Google Scholar
10. Feeny, D, Leiper, A, Barr, RD, et al. The comprehensive assessment of health status in survivors of childhood cancer: Application to high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1047–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Flapper, BC, Koopman, HM, ten Napel, C, Van Der Schans, CP. Psychometric properties of the TACQOL-asthma, a disease-specific measure of health related quality-of-life for children with asthma and their parents. Chron Respir Dis. 2006;3:65–72.Google Scholar
12. Griebsch, I, Coast, J, Brown, J. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: A critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e600-e614.Google Scholar
13. Hays, RD, Anderson, R, Revicki, D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Quality Life Res. 1993;2:441–419.Google Scholar
14. Hennessy, S, Kind, P. Measuring health status in children: Developing and testing a child-friendly version of EQ-5D. Paper presented at the 19th plenary meeting of the EuroQol group. University of York; 2002.Google Scholar
15. Konig, HH, Ulshofer, A, Gregor, M, et al. Validation of the EuroQol questionnaire in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:1205–1215.Google Scholar
16. Luo, N, Chew, LH, Fong, KY, et al. A comparison of the EuroQol-5D and the Health Utilities Index mark 3 in patients with rheumatic disease. J Reumatol. 2003;30:2268–2274.Google ScholarPubMed
17. Marra, CA, Rashidi, AA, Guh, D, et al. Are indirect utility measures reliable and responsive in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Quality Life Res. 2005;14:1333–1344.Google Scholar
18. Matza, LS, Swensen, AR, Flood, EM, Secnik, K, Leidy, NK. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7:79–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/TAP_Methods.pdf (accessed December 2, 2008).Google Scholar
20. Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (NIVEL). Chronisch zieke kinderen meer ‘in the picture’ [in Dutch]. http://www.nivel.nl/ (accessed: December 2, 2008).Google Scholar
21. Ravens-Sieberer, U, Erhart, M, Wille, N, et al. Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: Methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24:1190–1220.Google Scholar
22. Rosenbaum, PL, Saigal, S. Chapter 82. Measuring health-related quality of life in pediatric populations: Conceptual issues. In: Spilker, B, ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:790.Google Scholar
23. Sintonen, H, Pekurinen, M. A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D) and its applications. In: Walker, SR, Rosser, RM, eds. Quality of life assessment: Key issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Kluver Academic Publishers; 1993.Google Scholar
24. Stavem, K. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Quality Life Res. 1999;8:45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Stolk, EA, Busschbach, JJ, Vogels, T. Performance of the EuroQol in children with imperforate anus. Quality Life Res. 2000;9:29–38.Google Scholar
26. Theunissen, NC, Vogels, TG, Koopman, HM, et al. The proxy problem: Child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Quality Life Res. 1998;7:387–397.Google Scholar
27. Verrips, GH, Vogels, AG, Koopman, HM. (1999). Measuring health-related quality-of-life in a child population. Eur J Public Health. 1999;9:188–193.Google Scholar
28. Vogels, T, Verrips, GH, Koopman, HM, et al. TACQOL Manual: Parent form and child form. Leiden: Leiden Center for Child Health and Pediatrics LUMC-TNO; 2000.Google Scholar
29. Vogels, T, Verrips, GH, Verloove-Vanhorick, SP, et al. Measuring health-related quality-of-life in children: The development of the TACQOL parent form. Quality Life Res. 1998;7:457–465.Google Scholar
30. World Health Organization (WHO). Chronic diseases and health promotion. http://www.who.int/chp/en/ (accessed: December 2, 2008).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Willems Supplementary Material

Table.doc

Download Willems Supplementary Material(File)
File 75.8 KB