Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:15:09.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is the impact of physicians in prehospital treatment for patients in need of acute critical care? – An overview of reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

Gitte Valentin  and
Lotte Groth Jensen
Gitte Valentin*
Affiliation:
DEFACTUM, Department of Public Health and Health Services Research
Lotte Groth Jensen
Affiliation:
DEFACTUM, Department of Public Health and Health Services Research
*
Author for correspondence: Gitte Valentin, E-mail: gitte.valentin@rm.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this overview was to systematically identify and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews on the impact of prehospital physician involvement.

Methods

The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched from 1 January 2000 to 17 November 2017. We included systematic reviews comparing physician-based with non–physician-based prehospital treatment in patients with one of five critical conditions requiring a rapid response.

Results

Ten reviews published from 2009 to 2017 were included. Physician treatment was associated with increased survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patients with severe trauma; in the latter group, the result was based on more limited evidence. The success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) has improved over the years, but ETI by physicians is still associated with higher success rates than intubation by paramedics. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, intubation by paramedics who were not well skilled to do so markedly increased mortality.

Conclusions

Current evidence is hinting at a benefit of physicians in selected aspects of prehospital emergency services, including treatment of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and critically ill or injured patients in need of prehospital intubation. Evidence is, however, limited by confounding and bias, and comparison is hampered by differences in case mix and the organization of emergency medical services. Future research should strive to design studies that enable appropriate control of baseline confounding and obtain follow-up data for the proportion of patients who die in the prehospital setting.

Keywords

PrehospitalEmergency servicesPhysicianParamedicCardiac arrestTrauma
Type
Assessment
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , 2019 , pp. 27 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pakkanen, T, Virkkunen, I, Kamarainen, A, et al. (2016) Pre-hospital severe traumatic brain injury - Comparison of outcome in paramedic versus physician staffed emergency medical services. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 24, 62.Google Scholar
2.Suominen, P, Baillie, C, Kivioja, A, et al. (1998) Prehospital care and survival of pediatric patients with blunt trauma. J Pediatr Surg 33, 1388–1392.10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90014-8Google Scholar
3.Sollid, SJM, Rehn, M (2017) The role of the anaesthesiologist in air ambulance medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30, 513–517.Google Scholar
4.Fischer, M, Kamp, J, Garcia-Castrillo Riesgo, L, et al. (2011) Comparing emergency medical service systems--A project of the European Emergency Data (EED) Project. Resuscitation 82, 285–293.10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.001Google Scholar
5.Funder, KS, Petersen, JA, Steinmetz, J (2011) On-scene time and outcome after penetrating trauma: An observational study. Emerg Med J 28, 797–801.10.1136/emj.2010.097535Google Scholar
6.Bøtker, MT, Bakke, SA, Christensen, EF (2009) A systematic review of controlled studies: do physicians increase survival with prehospital treatment? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 17, 12.10.1186/1757-7241-17-12Google Scholar
7.Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6, e1000100.Google Scholar
8.Haugland, H, Rehn, M, Klepstad, P, Krüger, A (2017) Developing quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services: A consensus process. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 25, 14.10.1186/s13049-017-0362-4Google Scholar
9.Whiting, P, Savović, J, Higgins, JP, et al. (2016) ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 69, 225–234.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005Google Scholar
10.Bakalos, G, Mamali, M, Komninos, C, et al. (2011) Advanced life support versus basic life support in the pre-hospital setting: A meta-analysis. Resuscitation 82, 1130–1137.10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.006Google Scholar
11.Bossers, SM, Schwarte, LA, Loer, SA, et al. (2015) Experience in prehospital endotracheal intubation significantly influences mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 10, e0141034.10.1371/journal.pone.0141034Google Scholar
12.Bottiger, BW, Bernhard, M, Knapp, J, Nagele, P (2016) Influence of EMS-physician presence on survival after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 20, 4.10.1186/s13054-015-1156-6Google Scholar
13.Fouche, PF, Stein, C, Simpson, P, Carlson, JN, Doi, SA (2017) Nonphysician out-of-hospital rapid sequence intubation success and adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 70, 449–459.Google Scholar
14.Wilson, SL, Gangathimmaiah, V (2017) Does prehospital management by doctors affect outcome in major trauma? A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83, 965–974.Google Scholar
15.Ryynänen, OP, Iirola, T, Reitala, J, Palve, H, Malmivaara, A (2010) Is advanced life support better than basic life support in prehospital care? A systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18, 62.10.1186/1757-7241-18-62Google Scholar
16.Lossius, HM, Roislien, J, Lockey, DJ (2012) Patient safety in pre-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: A comprehensive meta-analysis of the intubation success rates of EMS providers. Crit Care 16, R24.10.1186/cc11189Google Scholar
17.von Vopelius-Feldt, J, Wood, J, Benger, J (2014) Critical care paramedics: where is the evidence? A systematic review. Emerg Med J 31, 1016–1024.Google Scholar
18.Crewdson, K, Lockey, DJ, Roislien, J, Lossius, HM, Rehn, M (2017) The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 21, 31.Google Scholar
19.Fouche, PF, Jennings, PA (2016) Physician presence at out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is not necessarily the cause of improved survival. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 24, 88.10.1186/s13049-016-0282-8Google Scholar
20.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]; 2011. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/ (accessed December 5, 2018).Google Scholar
21.Osterwalder, JJ (2003) Mortality of blunt polytrauma: A comparison between emergency physicians and emergency medical technicians--Prospective cohort study at a level I hospital in eastern Switzerland. J Trauma 55, 355–361.Google Scholar
22.Trunkey, D (1991) Initial treatment of patients with extensive trauma. N Engl J Med 324, 1259–1263.Google Scholar
23.Trunkey, DD (1983) Trauma. Accidental and intentional injuries account for more years of life lost in the U.S. than cancer and heart disease. Among the prescribed remedies are improved preventive efforts, speedier surgery and further research. Sci Am 249, 28–35.Google Scholar
24.Hamilton, A, Steinmetz, J, Wissenberg, M, et al. (2016) Association between prehospital physician involvement and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A Danish nationwide observational study. Resuscitation 108, 95–101.Google Scholar
25.Hiltunen, P, Jantti, H, Silfvast, T, Kuisma, M, Kurola, J, FINNRESUSCI Prehospital study group (2016) Airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Finland: current practices and outcomes. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 24, 49.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Valentin and Jensen supplementary material

Valentin and Jensen supplementary material 1

Download Valentin and Jensen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 65.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Valentin and Jensen supplementary material

Valentin and Jensen supplementary material 2

Download Valentin and Jensen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 70 KB
Supplementary material: File

Valentin and Jensen supplementary material

Valentin and Jensen supplementary material 3

Download Valentin and Jensen supplementary material(File)
File 19.3 KB