Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:03:43.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Makes Medical Systems Indian?: A Consideration of Doctor, Family, and Gender in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Helen E. Sheehan
Helen E. Sheehan
Affiliation:
American Cancer Society, New York City
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a short story entitled “Second Opinion,” R. K. Narayan, one of India's foremost writers in English, introduces us to Sambu, a young man who spends his days and nights at the “Boardless” coffee shop with friends, avoiding work, marriage, and his widowed mother. One day a local doctor, Dr. Kishen, informs Sambu that his mother is suffering from fainting spells, possibly a heart condition, and is in a “leave-taking” (dying) mood. Dr. Kishen, who knows the family, suggests to Sambu that he marry, thereby easing his mother's anxieties and ill health, and making her last days happy. However, he also gives his usual advice to get a “second opinion.” Sambu does, taking his mother to Dr. Natwar, a foreign-trained doctor, who has a spotless clinic with many rooms housing the latest medical equipment, a contrast to Dr. Kishen's ill-equipped, disorderly clinic. After his mother has undergone tests, Sambu meets with Dr. Natwar. The doctor gives him various documents and states that they show there is nothing wrong with his mother. Thus, armed with irrefutable proof provided by technology, Sambu avoids marriage and responsibility; his mother, afraid of losing her son altogether, acquiesces to his wishes, telling him to do whatever he wants (5).

Type
The Cultural Shaping of Biomedical Science and Technology
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , February 1986 , pp. 243 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bhargava, G.Sex-stereotyping and sex-congruency: components in the sex role definition of medical specialities in India. Social Science and Medicine, 1983, 17, 1017–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Dunn, F. L. Traditional Asian medicine and cosmopolitan medicine as adaptive systems. In Leslie, C. (Ed.), Asian medical systems: A comparative study, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976, 133–58.Google Scholar
3.Durkin-Longley, M.Multiple therapeutic use in urban Nepal. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 1984, 867–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Feierman, S.Change in African therapeutic systems. Social Science and Medicine 1979, 13B, 277–84.Google Scholar
5.Narayan, R. K. Second opinion. In his Malgudi days. New York: Viking Press. 1982, 166–93.Google Scholar
6.Ohnuki-Tierney, E.Illness and culture in contemporary Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
7.Papanek, H.Purdah in Pakistan: Seclusion and modern occupation for women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1971. 33, 517–30.Google Scholar
8.Sheehan, H. E. Organization, practice, and patronage of Ayurvedic and Unani medical systems in contemporary Hyderabad. Ph.D. diss.. University of Pennsylvania, 1983.Google Scholar
9.Van Der Ween, K. W. Western medical care in a nonwestern setting. In Asie du Slid: Traditions et changements, Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, No. 582. Sixth European Conference on Modern South Asian Studies (8 to 13 July 1978), organized by Marc Gaborieau and Alice Throner. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1979, 543–48.Google Scholar
10.Waxler, N. E.Behavioral convergence and institutional separation: an analysis of plural medicine in Sri Lanka. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 8, 1984. 187–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed