Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:10:45.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of female and male Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata in and around Jackson traps placed on fruiting host trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

J. Hendrichs ,
J. Reyes  and
M. Aluja
J. Hendrichs
Affiliation:
IAEA, P. O. Box 100, A-1400, Vienna, Austria Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003.
J. Reyes
Affiliation:
IAEA, P. O. Box 100, A-1400, Vienna, Austria Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003.
M. Aluja
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, M A 01003
Get access

Abstract

We studied the distribution of wild Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratias capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in different environments of trimedlure-baited Jackson traps during high fall season populations in Southern Egypt. We found that 98% of females attracted to within aim radius of standard trimedlure (TML)-baited Jackson traps remained on the surrounding foliage without approaching the trap. Also about 30 % of males aggregated there, calling and competing for matings with approaching females. The closest mating occurred 25 cm from a standard trap. The nearest lek formation away from a trap was observed at a distance of 2 m on the same trap tree. The highest captures of males were recorded in the morning after male calling on the foliage reached its daily peak. Jackson traps baited with both protein hydrolyzate and TML on cotton wicks caught as many males, but significantly more females than traps with TML only.

Résumé

On a étudié la distribution de la cératite sauvage Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) en Egypte méridionale, en automne lorsque la population des cératites a été nombreuse. L'expérience a crée plusieurs environnements de pièges “Jackson” garnis de trimedlure (TML). On a trouvé que 98% des femelles attirées dans un rayon de 1 mètre des pièges conventionnels à TML sont restées dans le feuillage avoisinant sans s'approcher du piège. Approximativement 30% des mâles s'y sont réunis aussi, faisant appel aux femelles à l'aide de phéromones et se faisant concurrence pour s'accoupler avec les femelles qui se rapprochaient. L'accouplement le plus proche d'un piège conventionnel a eu lieu à 25 cm. Le lek le plus proche, mais à l'extérieur, d'un piège s'est constitué à 2 mètres de distance, sur le même arbre. Les plus grandes captures de mâles ont été enregistrées le matin après le maximum d'appels par les mâles. Des pièges “Jackson” garnis d'hydrolysate de protéine et d'un mèche de coton trempé dans du TML ont attrapé autant de mâles, mais plus de femelles, que des pièges garnis uniquement de TML.

Keywords

Fruit fliesTephritidaebehaviourlektraptrimedlurehydrolized proteinCératiteTephritidaecomportementlekpiègetrimedlureprotéine hydrolisée
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 285 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, P., Hendrichs, J. and Liedo, P. (1988) Improving of attractant dispensing system for the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) sterile release program in Chiapas, Mexico. J. econ. Entomol. 81, 1068–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R., Herbert, R.H. and Grant, G.G. (1985) Isolation and identification of the sex pheromone of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wied.). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm. 73, 824–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelt, R.J., Schaner, A.M. and Jackson, L.L. (1986) Aggregation pheromones in five taxa of the Drosophila virilis species group. Physiol. Entomol. 11, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beroza, M., Green, N., Gertler, S.I., Steiner, L.F. and Miyashita, D.N. (1961) New attractants for the Mediterranean fruit fly. J. Agric. Food Chem. 9, 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, R.T., Nakagawa, S., Suda, D.Y. and Urago, T. (1978) Tephritid fruit fly trapping: liquid food baits in high and low rainfall climates. J. econ. Entomol. 71, 762–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delrio, G. and Zümreoglu, A. (1983) Attractability range and capture efficiency of medfly traps. In Fruit Flies of Economic Importance (Edited by Cavalloro, R.), pp. 445–450. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Delrio, G. (1986) Biotechnical methods for Ceratitis capitata Wied. In Fruit Flies of Economic Importance 1984 (Edited by Cavalloro, R.), pp. 11–21. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Dresner, E. (1970) A sticky trap for Mediterranean fruit fly survey. J. econ. Entomol. 63, 1813–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R. A. I. (1987) Behavioural strategies of fruit flies of the genus Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) significant in mating and host plant relationships. Bull, entomol. Res. 77, 73–81.Google Scholar
Havukkala, I. (1987) Odour source finding behaviour of the turnip root fly, Deliafloralis (Fall.) (Dipt., Antomyiidae) in the field. Z. angew. Entomol. 104, 105–110.Google Scholar
Hendrichs, J. and Hendrichs, M.A. (1990) Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in nature:Location and diel pattern of feeding and other activities on fruiting and nonfruiting hosts and nonhosts. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A.R. (1986) Reduction in trap captures of female fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) when synthetic male lures are added. J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 25, 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsoyannos, B.I. (1987) Some factors affecting field responses of Mediterranean fruit flies to colored spheres of different sizes. In Fruit Flies (Edited by Economopoulos, A.P.), pp. 469–473. Elsevier Science, N. Y.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, B.A., Cunningham, R.T., Rice, R.E., Harte, E.M. and McGovern, T.P. (1987) Performance of controlled release formulations of trimedlure to attract the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. Entomol. exp. appl. 44, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardt, B.A., Cunningham, R.T., Rice, R.E., Harte, E.M. and Hendrichs, J. (1989) Design and performance criteria of dispenser formulations of Trimedlure, the attractant of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. econ. Entomol. 82, 860–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P.T. (1987) Intragroup stimulation of pheromone release by male Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, M. (1939) Protein lures for fruit flies. J. econ. Entomol. 32, 558–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, D.J. and Peleg, B.A. (1965) The attraction of fed and starved males and females of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata Wied to Trimedlure. Israel J. agric. Res. 15, 83–86.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S., Farias, G.J. and Steiner, L.R. (1970) Response of female Mediterranean fruit flies to male lures in the relative absence of males. J. econ. Entomol. 63, 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., Cunningham, R.T. and Urago, T. (1971) The repellent effect of high trimedlure concentrations in plastic traps to Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii. J. econ. Entomol. 64, 762–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., Cunningham, R.T. and Urago, T. (1975) Performance of a sticky trap with trimedlure impregnated in the adhesive material. J. econ. Entomol. 68, 817–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., Steiner, L.F. and Farias, G.J. (1981) Response of virgin female Mediterranean fruit flies to live mature normal males, sterile males and trimedlure in plastic traps. J. econ. Entomol. 74, 566–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. and Economopoulos, A.P. (1976) Color responses of Ceratitis capitata flies. Z. angew. Entomol. 80, 434–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. and Hendrichs, J. (1979) Mating behaviour of Ceratitis capitata on a field-caged host tree. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72, 642–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaner, A.M., Bartelt, R.J. and Jackson, L.L. (1987) (Z)-ll-octadecenyl acetate, an aggregation pheromone in Drosophila simulans. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1777–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivinski, J.M. and Calkins, C.O. (1986) Pheromones and para-pheromones in the control of Tephritids. Florida Entomol. 69, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. 2nd edition. Freeman and Co., N. Y.Google Scholar
Teranishi, R., Buttery, R.G., Matsumoto, K.E., Stern, D.J., Cunningham, R.T. and Gothilf, S. (1987) Recent developments in chemical attractants for tephritid fruit flies. Am. Chem Soc. Symp. No. 330, 38, 431–438.Google Scholar
Villeda, M.P., Hendrichs, J., Aluja, M. and Reyes, J. (1988) Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata: behaviour in nature in relation to different Jackson traps. Florida Entomol. 71, 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zervas, G.A. (1987) Trapping Mediterranean fruit flies in Delta and McPhail traps in the field. In Fruit Flies (Edited by Economopoulos, A.P.), pp. 475–481, Elsevier Science, N. Y.Google Scholar