Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:25:31.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antibiosis component of resistance in sorghum to corn planthopper, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) (Homoptera: Delphacidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

B. M. Chandra Shekar ,
B. U. Singh ,
K. D. Reddy  and
D. D. R. Reddy
B. M. Chandra Shekar
Affiliation:
National Research Centre for Sorghum, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500 030 (AP), India
B. U. Singh*
Affiliation:
National Research Centre for Sorghum, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500 030 (AP), India
K. D. Reddy
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural UniversityRajendranagar, Hyderabad 500 030 (AP), India
D. D. R. Reddy
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural UniversityRajendranagar, Hyderabad 500 030 (AP), India
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access

Abstract

Ten sorghum genotypes at three plant growth stages were evaluated for antibiosis component of resistance to Peregrinus maidis expressed in terms of survival, duration and population build-up of nymphs as well as longevity and fecundity of adults. Support of nymphal survival and continued succession in mortality was evidenced on IS 18676, IS 18677 and IS 19349, indicating the influence of antibiosis factor(s) which again was supported by their prolonged duration. The growth index was consistently low at three plant growth stages on IS 18676 and IS 19349, but the genotype, IS 18677 did not express consistency on 45 days old plants. Greater longevity of adult females over males was consistent at different growth stages. Low fecundity was predominantly noticed on IS 18676, while reduced longevity was pronounced on IS 18677 and IS 19349 which was reflected in low population build-up at 15 and 30 days after infestation, when infested with 25 or 50 neonate nymphs. All these parameters contributed together suggest that antibiosis levels in IS 18676, IS 18677 and IS 19349 proportionately increased with plant age and the variability at different growth stages may be attributed to the differences in host genotypes and greatly aid as potential donors in resistance breeding programmes.

Résumé

Dix génotypes de sorgho à trois stade de developpement ont été evalués pour l'antibiosis comme composante de la résistance contre Peregrinus maidis et exprimée en termes de survie et de longivité des larves, la fécondité des adultes et l'augmentation des populations. La survie réduite des larves était apparente sur les génotypes IS 18676, IS 18677 et IS 19349, montrant ainsi la présence de facteurs antibiotiques. Cette découverte a également été confirmée par la durée prolongée du cycle larvaire. D'autre part, l'index de croissance a été de façon constante relativement bas pendant les stades de développement sur les génotypes IS 18676 et IS 19349 mais IS 18677 n'a pas montré de consistance sur les plants de 45 jours. Une plus grande longévité des adultes femelles a été observée de façon consistante pendant les differents stades de developpement. La fécondité reduite a été surtout notée sur IS 18676 alors que la réduction de la longevité a été plus nette sur IS 18677 et IS 19349; ce qui s'etait traduit par la faible recrudescence des populations à 15 et 30 jours après infestation avec 25 à 50 larves néonates. Tous ces paramètres réunis ont montré que les dégrés d'antibiosis dans IS 18676, IS 18677 et IS 19349 augmentent de façon proportioned à Page de la plante. La variabilité à chaque stade de développement peut être attribuée à la différence entre les génotypes des plantes hôtes. Celle-ci represente largement un atout potentiel dans le programme d'amelioration de la résistance.

Keywords

Antibiosiscorn planthopperPeregrinus maidisresistancesorghum
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 14 , Issue 5-6 , December 1993 , pp. 559 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agarwal, R. K., Verma, R. S. and Bhara, G. S. (1978) Screening of sorghum lines for resistance against shoot bug, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) (Homoptera: Delphacidae). JNKW Res. J. 12, 116.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1979–1980) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1981–1982) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1984–1985) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1986–1987) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1987–1988) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1988–1989) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1989–1990) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
AICSIP (1990–1991) Annual Report. All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1973) Pest: Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead). In Map 317, Distribution Maps of Pests, Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, Ser. A., London.Google Scholar
Borikar, P. S. and Deshpande, S. V. (1978) Preliminary observations on the role of aphids, delphacids and mechanical injuries on production of sugary substance in sorghum. Madras Agric. J. 65, 559–560.Google Scholar
Chandra Shekar, B. M. (1991) Mechanisms of Resistance in Sorghum to Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) (Homoptera: Delphacidae). M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
Chandra Shekar, B. M., Reddy, K. D., Singh, B. U. and Reddy, D. D. R. (1993) Antixenosis component of resistance to corn planthopper, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) in sorghum. InsectSci. Applic. 14, 77–84.Google Scholar
Chelliah, S. and Basheer, M. (1965) Biological studies of Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) (Araeopidae: Homoptera) on sorghum. Indian J. Entomol. 27, 466–471.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. H. (1969) Biological inter–relationship between Nephotettix impicticeps and some resistant and susceptible rice varieties. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
Choi, S. Y., Song, Y. H., Lee, J. O. and Park, J. S. (1973) Studies on the varietal resistance of rice to the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) (IV). Korean J. PI. Prot. 12, 139–142.Google Scholar
Fisk, J. (1978) Resistance of Sorghum bicolor to Rhopalosiphum maidis and Peregrinus maidis as affected by differences in the growth of the host. Ent. Exp. Appl. 23, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, J. (1980) Effect of HCN, phenolic acids and related compounds in Sorghum bicolor on the feeding behaviour of the planthopper, Peregrinus maidis. Ent. Exp. Appl. 27, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunathilagaraj, K. and Chelliah, S. (1985) Components of resistance to the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horv˚th), in some rice varieties. Trop. Pest Manage. 31, 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, A. N. M. R. (1975) Resistance to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) in rice varieties. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
Khan, M. G. and Rao, A. S. (1956) The influence of the black ant, Camponotus compressus F. on the incidence of two homopterous crop pests. Indian J. Entomol. 18, 199–200.Google Scholar
Khan, Z. R. and Saxena, R. C. (1985) Behavioral and physiological responses of Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae) to selected resistant and susceptible cultivars. J. Econ. Entomol. 78, 1280–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. H., Lee, J. O. and Goh, H. G. (1982) Differences between seedling bulk and population build-up of varietal resistance to white backed planthopper. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 7, 11.Google Scholar
Kishino, M. and Ando, Y. (1979) Resistance of rice plant to die green leafhopper 2. Fluctuations of antibiosis with the growing stage of the resistant rice varieties. Jap. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 23, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Z. P. (1943) General Catalogue of the Hemiptera Fasc. IV, Fulgoridea, Part 3, Araeopidae (Delphacidae). Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
Pablo, S. J. (1977) Resistance to whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvåth) in rice varieties. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Pongprasert, S. (1974) Resistance to the zig-zag leafhopper, Recilia dorsalis (Motschulsky) in rice varieties. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
Pura, C. D. (1971) Resistance to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) in rice varieties. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
Rajasekhar, P. (1989) Studies on the population dynamics of major pests of sorgum and bio-ecology and crop loss assessment due to the shoot bug, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead). Ph.D. Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Rivera, R. (1972) Resistance to the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvåth) in rice. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
Saxena, R. C. and Pathak, M. D. (1979) Factors governing susceptibility and resistance of certain rice varieties to the brown planthopper. In Brown Planthopper — Threat to Rice Production in Asia, pp. 303–317. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
Singh, B. U. and Rana, B. S. (1992) Stability of resistance to corn planthopper, Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead) in sorghum germplasm. Insect Sci. Applic. 13, 251–263.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. and Kidera, Y. (1948) The relation between the difference of rice varieties and the outbreak of rice leafhopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horv.). Oyo-Kontyu 4, 210–217.Google Scholar
Vaidya, G. R. and Kalode, M. B. (1981) Studies on biology and varietal resistance of whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvåth). Indian J. Pl. Prot. 10, 3–12.Google Scholar
Velusamy, R. (1972) Resistance in rice to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.Google Scholar