Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:41:22.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Diet for Rearing the Annona Fruit Borer Cerconota anonella Sepp, 1830 (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Mônica J. B. Pereira ,
Evoneo Berti-Filho  and
José R. P. Parra
Mônica J. B. Pereira*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, State of Mato Grosso University—UNEMAT MT 358, KM 7—Airport, District 78300-000 Tangará da Serra, MT, Brasil
Evoneo Berti-Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Agricultural Zoology, Esalq, University of São Paulo, in Piracicaba, State of São Paulo, Brazil
José R. P. Parra
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Agricultural Zoology, Esalq, University of São Paulo, in Piracicaba, State of São Paulo, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: MJBP. E-mail: monica@insecta.ufv.br
Get access

Abstract

Cerconota anonella is the most important pest of the Annonaceae in the Neotropical region for larval damage, which can result in 60 to 100% losses in fruit production. However information on the pest's biology is scarce. This research compared different artificial diets for rearing C. anonella under laboratory conditions (25.0 ± 1.0 °C; 60 ± 5.0% RH and 14 h photophase). Five diets were compared: A (bean, soybean meal, wheatgerm, casein and yeast), B (maize flour, wheatgerm and yeast), C (wheatgerm and casein), D (wheatgerm and soybean) and E (wheatgerm and soybean). In diet E, the amount of wheatgerm was higher than that in dietD. The results indicated that diet E was the most suitable one for the development of C. anonella.

Résumé

L'objectif de ce travail est de comparer des milieux artificiels destinés à l'élevage de Cerconota anonella Sepp, 1830 en conditions de laboratoire (25,0 ± 1.0 °C; HR 60, 0 ± 5.0% et 14 h de photopériode). Cinq milieux artificiels ont été comparés: A (haricot, farine de soja, germe de blé, caséine et levure), B. (farine de maïs, germe de blé et levure), C. (germe de blé et caséine), D (germe de blé et soja) et E (germe de blé et soja). La quantité de germe de blé du milieu E est plus élevée que celle du milieu D. Les résultats montrent que le milieu E est le mieux adapté au développement de C. anonella.

Keywords

Cerconota anonellarearingartificial dietCerconota anonellaélevagemilieu artificiel
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 137 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braga, S. R., Bandeira, C.T. and Mesquita, A. L. M. (1999) Occurrence and damage of soursop pests in northeast Brazil. Crop Prot. 18, 539–541.Google Scholar
Bustillo, A. E. and Peña, J. E. (1992) Biology and control of the Annona fruit borer Cerconota anonella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). Fruits 47, 81–84.Google Scholar
Fennah, R. G. (1937) Lepidopterous pests of the soursop in Trinidad. (1) Cerconota anonella. Trop. Agrie. 14, 175–178.Google Scholar
Greene, G. L., Leppla, N. C. and Dickerson, W. A. (1976) Velvet bean caterpillar. A rearing procedure and artificial medium, J. Econ. Entomol. 69, 447–448.Google Scholar
Haddad, M. L. and Parra, J. R. P. (1989) Determinação do número de ínstares de insetos. FEALQ, Piracicaba. 29 pp.Google Scholar
Hensley, S. D. and Hammond, A. M. Jr (1968) Laboratory techniques for rearing the sugarcane borer on an artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 61, 1742–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, N. B. and Godoy, F. J. (1989) Distribucion geografica de Talponia sp., Cerconota anonella Sepp., y Bephratelloides sp., perforadores de flores y frutos de Guanabana en Venezuela. Agron. Trop. 39, 319–321.Google Scholar
Muggleston, S.J. (1989) Rearing and the effects of photoperiod and temperature on diapause in Stathmopoda aposema (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae: Stathmopodinae). N. Z. J. Zool. 16, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitao, J. K. and Berenbaum, M. R. (1988) Laboratory rearing of the parsnip webworm, Depressaria pastinacella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81, 485–487.Google Scholar
Parra, J. R. P. (1996) Técnicas de criação de insetos para programas de controle biológico. FEALQ, Piracicaba.Google Scholar
Parra, J. R. P. and Mihsfeldt, L. H. (1992) Comparison of artificial diets for rearing the sugarcane borer, pp. 195–209. In Advances in Insect Rearing for Research and Pest Management (Edited by Anderson, T. E. and Leppla, N. C.). Westview Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Pereira, M. J. B. (2001) Biologia, Exigências Térmicas e Inimigos Naturais da broca-da-polpa das anonáceas Cerconota anonella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). Tese de Doutorado em Entomologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Polis, G.A. (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, R.V. (1991) Manejo de problemas entomológicos en huertos de Guanabana. In XXII Foro Entomológico—“Plagas de Frutales en Alternativas de Manejo. Casos: Guanabana, Curuba, Citricos”. Palmira. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.Google Scholar
Singh, P. (1983) A general purpose laboratory diet mixture for rearing insects. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 357–362.Google Scholar
Singh, P. (1985) Multiple species rearing diets, pp. 19–44. In Handbook of Insect Rearing (Edited by Singh, P. and Moore, R. F.). Elsevier, New York, London.Google Scholar
Vanderzant, E.S. (1974) Development, significance and application of artificial diets for insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19, 139–160.Google Scholar