Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:05:45.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical basis of TVu 946 stem resistance to Maruca testulalis (Geyer)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Dismas A. Otieno
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Ahmed Hassanali
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Peter W. Njoroge
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Ethylacetate-soluble fraction of methanol extract of the stems of two cowpea cultivars TVu 946 and Vita 1 were examined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and tested for antifeedant properties for larvae of Maruca testulalis by applying the extract on the leaf discs from the susceptible cowpea variety Vita 1. Extracts derived from TVu 946 showed significantly greater feeding inhibition than extracts from Vita 1 in all the tests. HPLC analysis gave different elution profiles for the two extracts. Together, these observations implicate allelochemical factors in general, and feeding deterrents in particular, as a basis of TVu 946 stem resistance to Maruca.

Résumé

Une petite portion d'ethylacetate soluble de methanol extrait des deux tiges des vertes feuilles de pois cultivars TVu 946 et Vita 1 sont experimentés par la plus haute execution de liquide Chromatographie (HPLC) et sont essayés pour les qualités non-nourrissantes par utilisant larvaire Maruca testulalis sur les dises des vertes feuilles de pois susceptible pour le Vita 1. Les resumés derivés de TVu 946 sont montré significativement que la larve n'a pas mangé les extraits de Vita 1 dans touts les essais. L'analyse chimique de HPLC a donné les profils differents qui sont restés intangibles dans les deux extraits. Ensemble, cettes observations ont impliqué qu'il y a en général, les facteurs allelochemicaux, qui en particulièrement prohibitent la larve à manger les feuilles, comme une base de resistance de tige de TVu 946 à Maruca.

Type
Section I: Types and mechanisms of host plant resistance
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dabrowski, Z. T., Bungu, M. and Ochieng', S. R. (1983) Studies on the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—III. Methods used in cowpea screening for resistance. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 141145.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. (1981) Relationship between cowpea crop phenology and field infestation by legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 74, 402408.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. (1982) A field screening technique for resistance of (Vigna unguiculata) to the pod-borer Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull. ent. Res. 72, 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, I. and Nakanishi, K. (1979) Some terpenoid insect antifeedants from tropical plants. In Advances in Pesticide Science, Part 2 (Edited by Geissbuhler, H., Brooks, G. T. and Kearny, P. C.), p. 284. IUPAC Pesticide Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
MacFoy, C. A. and Dabrowski, Z. T. (1984) Preliminary studies on cowpea resistance to Aphis craccivora Koch (Hom., Aphididae). Z. angew. Ent. 97, 202209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFoy, C. A., Dabrowski, Z. T. and Okech, S. (1983) Studies on the Legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—VI. Cowpea resistance to oviposition and larval feeding. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 147152.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Embden, H. F. van (1979) Insect pests of grain legumes. A. Rev. Ent. 24, 255278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1978) Maruca testulalis: an important pest of tropical grain legumes In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control (Edited by Singh, S. R., Embden, H. F. van and Taylor, T. A.), pp. 193200. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar