Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T10:40:56.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the performance of laboratory colonies of Glossina pallidipes Austen from two allopatric populations in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Jaap van Etten
Jaap van Etten
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

The performance of two laboratory colonies of Glossina pallidipes Austen originating from two areas in Kenya, Nkruman in the Rift Valley and Mwalewa forest in the coastal area, are described and compared. Two attempts to rear flies from Nkruman failed. Flies from Mwalewa were maintained with variable success for four years. Difficulties in rearing flies from Mwalewa could be explained by irregularities in the conditions of the breeding room, in contrast to failures in rearing flies from Nkruman. Life budgets were made to evaluate the performances of the colonies. In both Nkruman colonies the highest mortality factor was ‘loss due to non-production’. In the Mwalewa colony the highest mortality was ‘loss due to low production’. The key mortality factors were ‘loss due to low production’ (Nkruman colony A), and ‘premating mortality’ (Nkruman colony B, and Mwalewa colony). Factors which possibly contribute to the difficulties in rearing G. pallidipes are discussed. Flies from Nkruman and Mwalewa differed from each other in copulation time, pupal weight, age at which the first larva is produced, and duration of interlarval periods. The results of this study support the assumption of the existance of population diversity in this species.

Keywords

Glossina pallidipesallopatric populationslaboratory colonieslife budgetskey mortality factorspopulation diversity
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 177 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Denlinger, D. L., Chaudhury, M. F. B. and Dhadialla, T. S. (1978) Cyclic AMP is a likely mediator of ovulation in the tsetse fly. Experientia 34, 1296–1297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ejezie, G. C. (1976) Some aspects of endocrine control of reproduction in the female tsetse fly. Glossina austeni Newst. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 247 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etten, J. Van (1976) Preliminary observations on inter-population diversity in the tsetse fly Glossina pallidipes Aust. Proc. 1st. E.A. Conf. Ent. Pest. Contr., 6–10 December 1976, Nairobi, pp. 13–18.Google Scholar
Etten, J. Van (1977) Comparative studies on some aspects of the feeding of flies, from two populations of Glossina pallidipes Austen in Kenya. Proc. 15th Meeting OAU&ISTRC, Banjul, The Gambia, 23–30 April 1977, Publ. No. 110 pp. 286–294.Google Scholar
Geigy, R. (1948) Elevage de Glossina palpalis. Acta Tropica 5, 201–218.Google ScholarPubMed
Hursey, B. S. (1970) Observations on factors affecting emergence of Glossina pallidipes Austen and parasitization of this species by Thyridanthrax abruptus Loew. Tsetse Fly Breeding under Laboratory Conditions and its Practical Application. 1st Int. Symp., 22–23 April 1969, pp. 317–328.Google Scholar
Jaenson, T. G. T. (1978a) Reproductive biology of the tsetse Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera, Glossinidae) with special reference to mating behaviour. Thesis, University of Uppsala, 1978.Google Scholar
Jaenson, T. G. T. (1978b) Mating behaviour of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera, Glossinidae): Genetic differences in copulation time between allopatric populations. Ent. exp. appi. 24, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenson, T. G. T. (1978c) Virus-like rods associated with salivary gland hyperplasia in tsetse, Glossina pallidipes. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73, 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P. A. (1967) The control of digestion in the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans: A comparison between field flies and flies reared in captivity. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leegwater-Van Der Linden, M. E. (1980) Recent advances in the rearing of Glossina pallidipes Austin In: Isotope and Radiation Research on Animal Diseases and their Vectors. Proc. Symp. IAEA/FAO, Vienna, 7–11 May 1980, pp. 413–123.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M., Jordan, A. M. and Boyle, J. A. (1966) A promising method for rearing Glossina austeni (Newst.) on a small scale, based on the use of rabbits' ears for feeding. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Trop. 60, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinhao, R. C. (1972) The life budget in the study of tsetse fly colonies. An. Esc. nac. Saude pubi. Med. Trop. 6, 109–113.Google Scholar
Podolor, H. and Rogers, D. (1975) A new method for the identification of key factors from life-table data. J. anim. Ecol. 44, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A. and Kenyanjui, E. N. F. (1972) The maintenance of a colony of Glossina pallidipes Austen Ann. Trop. Med. Par. 66, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar