Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:14:37.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution and Effect of Bean flies, Ophiomyia phaseoli and O. spencerella, on Beans at Kabete, Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

B. Tengecho ,
C. L. Coulson  and
H. A. d'Souza
B. Tengecho
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, National Museum of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya
C. L. Coulson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabete Campus, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, Kenya
H. A. d'Souza
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabete Campus, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Eight cultivars of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and the Tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) were used to study the distribution of puparia of the bean fly species Ophiomyia phaseoli (Tyron) and O. spencerella (Greathead). The puparia of the two bean fly species were distributed differently in the plant, O. spencerella predominating in the root and O. phaseoli in the shoot. There were significant differences between some of the bean cultivars and the number of puparia found. Tepary had the least puparia and P. vulgaris cultivars GLP 806 and GLP 1131 the most. There was a low correlation between the number of puparia and the final yield or root dry weight.

Résumé

Huit variétées des haricots ordinaires Phaseolus vulgaris L. et l'haricot “tepary” Phaseolus acutifolius ont été utilisées pour étudier la distribution des pupes des mouches de l'haricot de l'espèce Ophiomyia phaseoli (Tyron) et O. spencerella (Greathead). Les pupes des deux espèces de mouches de l'haricot se sont réparties différement sur la plante, O. phaseoli principalement sur la pousse et O. spencerella sur la racine. Il ya eu des différences significatives entre les variétées d'haricots et le nombre de pupes trouvées. Tepary avait le moins de pupes et GLP 806 et 1131 le plus. Aucune corrélation n'a été établie entre le nombre de pupes et le rendement final ou le poids sec des racines.

Keywords

Bean flydistributionyield
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , August 1988 , pp. 505 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Greathead, D. J. (1969) A study in East Africa of the bean flies (Dipt. Agromyzidae) affecting Phaseolus vulgaris and of their natural enemies, with the description of the new species of Melanagromyza Hend. Bull. Ent. Res. 59, 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karel, A. K. and Mueke, J. M. (1978) Management of pests in mixed cropping system, Kiambu District. University of Nairobi, Faculty of Agriculture, Plant Protection Programme, First report, 48–61. Dec. 1978.Google Scholar
Karel, A. K. (1984) Resistance to bean fly (Ophiomyia phaseoli Tyron) in common beans. Proc. Third Workshop on Bean Research in Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 43–17. Aug. 1984.Google Scholar
Khaemba, B. M. and Khamala, C. P. M. (1978) A preliminary survey of phytophagous pests of mixed cropping system of Giku Division, Kiambu. University of Nairobi, Faculty of Agriculture, Plant Protection Programme, First report, 62–71. Dec. 1978.Google Scholar
Khamala, C. P. M., Khaemba, B. M. and Epila, J. (1979) A survey of arthropod pests in Murang'a district. University of Nairobi, Faculty of Agriculture, Plant Protection Programme, Second report. Vol. 1 Dec. 1979.Google Scholar
Msangi, R. B. and Karel, A. K. (1984) Host plant resistance in common bean to bean fly (Ophiomyia phaseoli Tyron). Proc. Third Workshop on Bean Research in Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 60–63. Aug. 1984.Google Scholar
Mueke, J. M. (1979) A preliminary screening of seventeen bean varieties for bean fly resistance. University of Nairobi, Faculty of Agriculture. Plant Protection Programme, Third report Vol. 2. 59–72 1979.Google Scholar
Quintin, M. E. (1984) Progress report on bean research in Mgeta. Proc. Third Workshop on Bean Research in Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 63–65. Aug. 1984.Google Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. and Ross, C. W. (1978) Plant Physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc., Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Spencer, K. A. (1973) Agromyzidae (Diptera) of Economic Importance. XII and 418 The Hague, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K. A. and Stegmaier, C. E. (1973) The Agromyzidae of Florida with a supplement of species of the Caribbean. Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas. Vol. 7, 204.Google Scholar
Wallace, G. B. (1939) French bean diseases and bean fly in East Africa. East Afr. Agric. J. 5, 170–175.Google Scholar
Waring, P. F. and Philips, I. D. J. (1981) Growth and Differentiation in Plants. Third Edition. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, England.Google Scholar