Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:19:12.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of different pulses on development, growth and reproduction of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

S.R. Tripathi  and
Rajesh Singh
S.R. Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur - 273009, India
Rajesh Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur - 273009, India
Get access

Abstract

Per cent survival, larval period and weight, pupal duration and weight, emergence, adult longevity and fecundity of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) were affected by the pulse species on which it was reared. The pulses could be classified into two groups i.e. pigeon pea and chick pea which were suitable for growth, development and fecundity and black gram, sweet pea, green gram, broad bean and lentil which were unsuitable.

Résumé

Les espèces de legumineuses sur lesquelles les Heliothis armigera (Hubner) adultes etaient elèvés, ont pu influencees le pourcentage d'emergence, de longervité et de fecondité de ces derniers. D'autre part ces mêmes espèces ont influencés le pourcentage de survie, de la periode et du poids larvaire ainsi que celui de la durée du developpement et du poids des chrysalides. Les legumineuses ont pu être classifier en 2 groupes: - par exemple les petits pois sont apropriès pour la croissance, le developpement et la fecondité et les pois chiches, les pois de senteur, les horicots et les lentiles qui n'etaient pas apropriés.

Keywords

Heliothis armigeradevelopmentgrowthreproductionpulsesHeliothis armigeradeveloppementcroissancereproductionlegumineuses
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 145 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basu, A.C. (1944) Effect of different food plants on the larval and post larval development of the moth Prodenia litura. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 44, 275–288.Google Scholar
Dube, A.K., Misra, V.S. and Dixit, S.A. (1981) Effect of host plants on the developmental stages of Heliothis armigera. Indian J. Ent. 43, 178–182.Google Scholar
Kalode, M.P. and Pant, N.C. (1963) Effect of host plants on the survival, development and behaviour of Chilo zonellus under laboratory conditions. Indian J. Entomol. 29, 48–57.Google Scholar
Katiyar, O.P., Mukherji, S.P. and Lakshman, Lai (1975) Effect of certain natural food plants on the larval development of Diacrisia obliqua. Indian J. Entomol. 32, 102–105.Google Scholar
Lakshman, Lai and Mukherji, S.P. (1978) Growth potential of Diacrisia obliqua in relation to certain food plants. Indian J. Entomol. 40, 177–181.Google Scholar
Ratan, Lal and Nayak, G.N. (1963) Effect of host plants on the development of caterpillars of Prodenia litura and susceptibility to different insecticides. Indian J. Entomol. 25, 299–306.Google Scholar
Moussa, M.A., Zahar, M.A. and Korthy, F. (1960) Abundance of the cotton leaf worm Prodenia litura in relation to host plants and their effects on biology. Bull. Soc. Ent. Egypt 44, 241–251.Google Scholar
Painter, R.H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. McMill. Co., New York. pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
Pandey, N.D., Yadav, D.R. and Teoria, T.P.S. (1968) Effect of different food plants on the larval and post larval development of Diacrisia obliqua. Indian J. Entomol. 30, 229–234.Google Scholar
Pandey, P.N. (1975) Host preferences of Argenta cribrarla. Dtsch. Entomol. Z. N. F, 22, 193–199.Google Scholar
Pandey, P.N. (1977) Host preference and selection of Diaphania indica. Dtsch. Ent. Z. N. F. 24, 172–195.Google Scholar
Perumal, R.S., Asafali, K. and Subramaniam, R. (1972) Effect of feeding different host plants on the larval and post larval development of Pericalia ricini. Madras Agric. J. 59, 324–328.Google Scholar
Singh, H. and Singh, G. (1975) Biological studies on Heliothis armigera in Punjab. Indian J. Entomol. 37, 154–164.Google Scholar
Sinha, M.M., Yadav, R.P. and Singh, R. (1975) Laboratory studies on the effects of some varieties of mung on the growth and development of Diacrisia obliqua. Labdev J. Sci. Tech. 13B, 175–178.Google Scholar
Srivastava, B.K. (1959) Growth potential of Laphygma exigua in relation to certain food plants. Madras Agric. J. 46, 255–259.Google Scholar
Srivastava, A. K. and Pandey, P.N. (1979) Effect of host plants on development and growth of Pericalis ricini. Biochem. exp. Biol. 15, 245–247.Google Scholar
Thobbi, V.V. (1961) Growth potential of Prodenia litura in relation to certain food plants at Surat. Indian J. Ent. 23, 224–264.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S.R. and Sharma, S.K. (1987) Effect of different food plants on development of Heliothis armigera. Nigeria J. Ent. 6, 33–38.Google Scholar
Yadav, R.P., Singh, R. and Kumar, A. (1978) Larval survival and growth potential of Diacrisia obliqua in relation to some promising varieties of black gram. Indian J. Ent. 40, 146–149.Google Scholar