Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:18:12.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Soybean Hosts on the Development of the Soybean Hairy Caterpillar, Spilarctia casignata Koll. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Fanindra P. Neupane
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, P. O. Box 304, Rampur Post Office, Chitwan, Nepal
Get access

Abstract

Four soybean genotypes, PI 227687, PI 229358, Davis and Hardee were tested for their antixenosis and antibiosis to the soybean hairy caterpillar, Spilarctia casignata Koll. PI 227687 and PI 229358 showed greater antixenosis and strong antibiosis (high larval and pupal mortalities, reduced pupal weight, and a low growth index). Davis and Hardee were the favoured hosts as indicated by high larval preference based on increased feeding and low larval and pupal mortalities, increased pupal weight and a high growth index.

Résumé

Quatre types génétiques de soja, le PI 227687, le PI 229358, le Davis et le Hardee ont fait l'objet d'une étude en raison de leur antixenose et leur antibiose vis-à-vis de la chenille-à-poils du soja le Spilarctia casignata Koll. Le PI 227687 et le PI 229358 ont manifesté une grande antixenose et une forte antibiose (d'où taux élevé de mortalité chez les larves et les chrisalides, diminution de poids chez les chrisalides et faible indice de croissance). Le Davis et le Hardee, par contre, se sont révelés être des hôtés favorables à la chenille-à-poils comme cela a dû se faire remarquer par une forte concentration de larves en quête d'une alimentation abondante, et aussi par un faible taux de mortalité chez les larves et les chrisalides, une remarquable augmentation du poids chez les chrisalides, et un indice de croissance élevé.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bharati, M. P. (1988) General report on summer legumes — 1988. Paper Presented to Summer Crops Working Group Meeting, Agriculture Station, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, April 1719. Available from Nepal Grain Legume Programme, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.Google Scholar
Chiang, H. S., Norris, D. M., Ciepiela, A., Ousterwyk, A., Shapiro, P. and Jackson, M. (1986) Comparative constitutive resistance in soybean lines to Mexican bean beetle. Entomol, Exp. Appl. 42, 1926.Google Scholar
Joshi, S. L. (1976) Preliminary study of the loss assessment due to hairy caterpillar, Spilarctia casignata Koll. on soybean. Nepalese J. Agric. 6–11, 139144.Google Scholar
Neupane, F. P. (1989) Crop pests and their control 3rd ed. Sajha Prakashan, Kathmandu, Nepal (in Nepali).Google Scholar
Neupane, F. P. (1981) Bionomics of the hairy caterpillar, Spilarctia casignata Koll. J. Nat. Hist. Mus. 5, 19.Google Scholar
Neupane, F. P. and Thapa, R. B. (1985) Efficacy of various insecticides and detergents against the grown-up larvae of the soybean hairy caterpillar, Spilarctia casignata Koll. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci. 6, 110.Google Scholar
Neupane, F. P. and Norris, D. M. (1990) Iodoacetic acid alteration of soybean resistance to the cabbage looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 19, 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajbhandari, B. R. (1988) Grain legumes of Nepal. Renu Rajbhandari, Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. C. and Norris, D. M. (1990) Antifeedant and antibiotic effects of flavonoids in insect-resistant PI 227687 soybean to cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. J. Insect Behav. (in press).Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. J. (1985) Resistance to insect defoliators. In World Soybean Research Conference III: Proceedings (Edited by Shibles, R.), Westview, Boulder, Colorado, USA. pp. 400405.Google Scholar