Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:07:39.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of rice germplasm for resistance to a leaffolder, stemborer and planthopper under field and glasshouse conditions in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2012

Preetinder S. Sarao*
Affiliation:
Rice Section, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana141 004, Punjab, India
Manjit S. Mahal
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana141 004, Punjab, India
Get access

Abstract

Rice germplasm comprising 66 lines/varieties was evaluated under field conditions for two wet seasons against a yellow stemborer, leaffolder and whitebacked planthopper (WBPH) at the vegetative and panicle initiation crop stages. Glasshouse screening of germplasm for WBPH resistance was done at the seedling stage. At the vegetative stage, over the 2 years, 18 lines/varieties showed leaffolder damage from 6.21 ± 0.33 to 9.99 ± 4.07%, while at the panicle initiation stage, six lines/varieties showed damage from 8.77 ± 1.25 to 12.25 ± 4.67%. A highly significant correlation between flag leaf width and per cent infested leaves at the vegetative (r = 0.88) and panicle initiation (r = 0.79) stages was recorded. No significant correlation was observed between plant height and leaffolder infestation at the vegetative stage; however, it was significant at the panicle initiation stage (r = 0.37). The dead heart (DH) damage at the vegetative stage over the years was less than 1% in six lines/varieties, while at the panicle initiation stage, seven lines/varieties showed whitehead (WH) damage ranging from 1.29 to 1.92%. A highly significant correlation was observed between plant height and per cent DH and WH at the vegetative (r = 0.73) and panicle initiation stages (r = 0.81). Such a relationship was not observed between leaf width and stemborer infestation at both stages. Two lines, viz. IR 59 547-235-3-3 and SPR 85 163-5-1-2-4, were resistant to the WBPH under glasshouse screening, whereas 20 lines were moderately resistant and the remaining lines were susceptible.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (1996) Standard Evaluation System for Rice. 4th edn.International Rice Research Institute, Los Banós. pp. 3031. Available at:http://www.scribd.com/doc/67222220/Standard-Evaluation-System-for-Rice.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2006) Progress Report, Entomology and Plant Pathology (Volume 2) – All India Coordinated Rice Improvement Programme (ICAR), Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2009) Available at:www.indiastat.com.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2011) Package of Practices for Crops of Punjab (Kharif 2011). Directorate of Extension Education, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. 3 pp.Google Scholar
Bautista, R. C., Heinrichs, E. A. and Rejesus, R. S. (1984) Economic injury levels for the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): insect infestation and artificial leaf removal. Environmental Entomology 13, 439443.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, R. C., Khush, G. S. and Heinrichs, E. A. (1984) Varietal resistance to rice stem-borers in Asia. Insect Science and Its Application 3, 447463.Google Scholar
Dakshayani, K., Bentur, J. S. and Kalode, M. B. (1993) Nature of resistance in rice varieties against leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée). Insect Science and Its Application 14, 107114.Google Scholar
Dale, D. (1994) Insect pests of the rice plant – their biology and ecology, pp. 363485. In Biology and Management of Rice Insects (edited by ). International Rice Research Institute/Wiley Eastern Limited, Los Banós/New Delhi.Google Scholar
Dhaliwal, G. S., Arora, R. and Dhawan, A. K. (2004) Crop losses due to insect pests in Indian agriculture: an update. Indian Journal of Ecology 31, 17.Google Scholar
Gomez A. K. and Gomez A. A. (eds) (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Johan Wiley and Sons, New York. 680 pp.Google Scholar
Gottfried, F. and Faheemah, F. (1981) The spinning (stitching) behavior of the rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 29, 138146.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K. and Shukla, K. K. (1985) Sources and inheritance of resistance to whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera in rice, pp. 529535. In Rice Genetics 1: Proceedings of the International Rice Genetics Symposium, Manila, Philippines 27–31 May 1985 (edited by ). International Rice Research Institute, Los Banós.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, E. A. (1988) Role of insect resistant varieties in rice IPM systems, pp. 4354. In Pesticide Management and Integrated Pest Management in Southeast Asia (edited by ). Consortium for International Crop Protection, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
Heinrichs E. A., Medrano F. D. and Rapusas H. R. (eds) (1985) Genetic Evaluation for Insect Resistance in Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños. 365 pp.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, E. A. and Rapusas, H. R. (1983) Levels of resistance to the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in rice varieties with different resistance genes. Environmental Entomology 12, 17931797.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, E. A., Saxena, R. C. and Chelliah, S. (1979) Development and Implementation of Insect Pest Management Systems for Rice in Tropical Asia, ASPAC Bulletin 127. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Heong K. L. and Hardy B. (eds) (2009) Planthoppers: New Threats to the Sustainability of Intensive Rice Production Systems in Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños. 460 pp.Google Scholar
Heong, K. L., Teng, P. S. and Moody, K. (1995) Managing rice pests with less chemicals. GeoJournal 35, 337349.Google Scholar
Horgan, F. (2009) Mechanisms of resistance: a major gap in understanding planthopper–rice interactions, pp. 281302. In Planthoppers: New Threats to the Sustainability of Intensive Rice Production Systems in Asia (edited by ). International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, C., Ul Haq, H., Tanweer, N. and Mahmood, N. (1989) Incidence of rice stemborer in the Punjab. International Rice Research Newsletter 14, 38.Google Scholar
Islam, Z. and Karim, A. N. M. R. (1996) Influence of rice plant morphology on leaffolder incidence. International Rice Research Newsletter 20, 31.Google Scholar
Islam, Z. and Karim, A. N. M. R. (1997) Leaf folding behaviour of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) and Marasmia patnalis Bradley, and the influence of rice leaf morphology on damage incidence. Crop Protection 16, 215220.Google Scholar
Israel P. (1967) Varietal resistance to rice stemborers in India, pp. 391–403. In Major Insect-Pests of the Rice Plan. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Kalode, M. B., Vishwanathan, K. and Seshu, V. D. (1975) Standard test to characterize host plant resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 3, 204205.Google Scholar
Kumar, H. (1995) Varietal resistance, population dynamics and timing insecticidal application with peak oviposition by Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on rice. Annals of Applied Biology 127, 221228.Google Scholar
Kushwaha, K. S. and Chand, H. (1988) Effect of transplanting date and nitrogen level on the incidence of whitebacked planthopper in paddy. Indian Journal of Entomology 50, 1216.Google Scholar
Kushwaha, K. S., Mrig, K. K. and Kapoor, T. R. (1986) Studies on the avoidable losses caused by whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera Horvath on rice protected at different growth stages after different insecticide treatments. Tropical Pest Management 32, 2123.Google Scholar
Laskar, N., Ghimiray, T. S. and Biswas, S. (2008) Field evaluation of rice germplasm against leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenée and impact of morphological base of resistance. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 6, 16.Google Scholar
Li, D. H., Fu, Q., Wang, F., Yao, Q., Lai, F. X., Wu, J. C. and Zhang, Z. T. (2004) Resistance of transgenic rice containing both sck and crylac genes against Chilo suppressalis and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Chinese Journal of Rice Science 18, 4347.Google Scholar
Majumdar, N. D., Pathak, K. A. and Brothakur, D. N. (1986) Reaction of rice genotypes to leaffolder, C. medinalis (Gn.). Oryza 21, 205208.Google Scholar
Nair, M. R. G. K. (1995) Insects and Mites of Crops in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. 407 pp.Google Scholar
Pandhya, H. V., Shah, A. H., Patel, C. B. and Pruohit, M. S. (1995) Screening for susceptibility of rice to leaffolder, C. medinalis (Gn.). Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal 20, 188189.Google Scholar
Patanakamjourn, S. and Pathak, M. D. (1967) Varietal resistance to Asiatic rice borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) in rice and its association with various plant characters. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 50, 287292.Google Scholar
Patel, V. S., Patel, B. H. and Desai, N. D. (1986) Relative damage and losses due to insect pests on paddy. Pesticides 20, 2426.Google Scholar
Pathak, M. D. (1968) Ecology of common insect pests of rice. Annual Review of Entomology 13, 257294.Google Scholar
Pathak, M. D. (1971) Resistance to insect pests in rice varieties. Oryza 8, 135144.Google Scholar
Pathak M. D., Andres F., Galacgac N., Ramos R. (1971) Resistance of Rice Varieties to Striped Rice Borer. International Rice Research Institute Technical Bulletin, 11, 69.Google Scholar
Pathak M. D. and Dhaliwal G. S. (1981) Trends and Strategies for Rice Insect Problems in Tropical Asia. IRRI Research Paper Series No. 64, pp. 25–39. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños.Google Scholar
Pathak, M. D. and Khan, Z. R. (1994) Insect Pests of Rice. International Rice Research Institute/International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Los Baños/Nairobi. 89 pp.Google Scholar
Prasada Rao, U, Rama Prasad, A. S. and Mishra, B. (2002) High Yielding Rice Varieties of India-2000. Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad. 102 pp.Google Scholar
Ramaraju, K., Babu, P. C. S. and Venugopal, M. S. (1996) Effect of different levels of whitebacked planthopper (WBPH), Sogatella furcifera on different rice cultivars. Madras Agriculture Journal 83, 2024.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, C. and Jatileksono, T. (1996) Intercountry comparison of insect and disease losses, pp. 305316. In Rice Research in Asia: Progress and Priorities (edited by ). CAB International and IRRI, Los Banós.Google Scholar
Rao Chalapathi, N. B. V., Singh, V. S. and Subhas, C. (2002) Evaluation of rice germplasm for resistance to rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Indian Journal of Entomology 64, 124129.Google Scholar
Rubia, E. G. and Penning de Vries, F. W. T (1990) Simulation of rice yield reduction caused by stemborers. International Rice Research Newsletter 15, 34.Google Scholar
Sardesai, N., Rajyashri, K. R., Behura, S. K., Nair, S. and Mohan, M. (2001) Genetic, physiological and molecular interactions of rice with its major dipteran pest, gall midge. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 64, 115131.Google Scholar
Selvaraju, K., Shanmugasundaram, P., Mohankumar, S., Asaithambi, M. and Balasaraswathi, R. (2007) Detection of quantitative trait locus for leaffolder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée)) resistance in rice on linkage group 1 based on damage score and flag leaf width. Euphytica 157, 3543.Google Scholar
Senapati, B., Samalo, A. P. and Patnaik, N. C. (1990) Stemborer incidence in deepwater rice in Orissa (India). Orissa Journal of Agriculture Research 3, 152154.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, S. K. (1989) Leaffolder (LF) and yield losses on some selected rice varieties. International Rice Research Newsletter 14, 10.Google Scholar
Shukla, K. K., Gupta, A. K. and Saini, R. S. (1993) Reaction of some rice varieties in the 8th International Bacterial Blight Nursery to whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvath). Journal of Insect Science 6, 113114.Google Scholar
Shukla, K. K., Saini, R. S. and Gupta, A. K. (1987) Reaction of selected rices to whitebacked planthopper (WBPH). International Rice Research Newsletter 12, 1314.Google Scholar
Singh, J., Sidhu, G. S., Shukla, K. K. and Sharma, D. R. (1993) Screening entries in the International Whitebacked Planthopper Nursery (IRWBPHN) 1991 for resistance to whitebacked planthopper (WBPH) in Ludhiana, India. International Rice Research Notes 18, 2526.Google Scholar
Song, X. L., Qiang, S., Liu, L. L., Xu, Y. H. and Liu, Y. L. (2002) Gene flow of pollen cross between Oryza officinalis Wall and transgenic rice with bar gene. Journal of Nanjing Agriculture University 25, 58(in Chinese with an English abstract).Google Scholar
Sogawa, K., Zeng, H. J., Qiang, Q. and Zeng, D. L. (2005) Resistance performance to whitebacked planthopper in different phenotypes of japonica/indica doubled haploid rice lines. Rice Science 12, 113136.Google Scholar
Subudhi, H. N. and Padhi, G. (2008) Field evaluation of rice cultivars against the yellow stemborer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Wlk.). Oryza 45, 222225.Google Scholar
Teng P. S., Heong K. L. and Keith M. (1993) Advances in tropical rice pest management research. In New Frontiers in Rice Research (edited by K. Muralidharan and E. A. Siddiq). Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad. 255 pp.Google Scholar
Viajante, V. and Heinrichs, E. A. (1987) Plant age effects of rice cultivar IR 46 on the susceptibility to the yellow stemborer Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Crop Protection 6, 3337.Google Scholar
Xiao, M. K. (1990) Preliminary study on relationship between leaf sheath rotted disease and rice leaf roller. Plant Protection 16, 1929.Google Scholar
Xu, J., Qi-Xiang Wang, Q. X. and Wu, Jin-Cai (2010) Resistance of cultivated rice varieties to Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 11661171.Google Scholar
Xue, I. J., Shen, X., Zhan, G. F. and Ihao, B. H. (1987) Measurement of resistance in rice cu1tivars to C. medinalis. Plant Protection 13, 57.Google Scholar