Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:09:02.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional and Numerical Responses of Cheilomenes lunata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Feeding on the Cowpea Aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

T. I. Ofuya  and
A. E. Akingbohungbe
T. I. Ofuya
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, The Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 704, Akure, Nigeria
A. E. Akingbohungbe
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

The density responsiveness of larvae and adults of Cheilomenes lunata (Fabricius) preying on Aphis craccivora Koch was investigated under laboratory conditions where temperature and relative humidity were uncontrolled and fluctuated between 24–30°C and 43–90% respectively. The feeding rates of C. lunata were positively correlated with the population density of prey. The number of prey consumed daily by each predator stage tested, increased more steeply at lower, than at higher prey densities, exhibiting thus the Type II functional response. Fecundity of C. lunata females also increased to a plateau with increasing prey density.

Résumé

La réaction des larves et des adulte d'Cheilomenes lunata (Fabricius) à croissant densité d' Aphis craccivora Koch a été etudiée à une température variant de 24 à 30°C et humidité de 43 à 90%. Les taux d'alimentation de C. lunata manifestent une corrélation hautement significative avec la densité de population de la proie. Le nombre de poies consommées quotidiennement par chaque stade considéré du prédateur augmentait plus brusquenent aux failes qu'aux fortes densités de proies, manifestant ainsi chez le prédateur le Type II de réponse fonctionelle. Fécondité des C. lunata femelles aussi augmentait à une plateau avec croissant proie densité.

Keywords

Cheilomenes lunatafunctional responsesnumerical responsesAphis craccivoracowpeaprey density
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , August 1988 , pp. 543 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arditi, R. (1983) A unified model of the functional response of predators and parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 52, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlen, E. (1973) Crop Pests in Tanzania and Their Control. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
Booker, R. H. (1964) The effect of sowing date and spacing on rosette disease of groundnut in Northern Nigeria, with observations on the vector, Aphis craccivora. Ann. appl. Biol. 52, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, S. A., Coats, J. R. and Ellis, C. R. (1979) Selective toxicity of three synthetic pyrethroids to eight Coccinellids, a Eulophid parasite and two pest chrysomelids. Environ. Ent. 8, 720–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppel, H. C. and Mertins, J. W. (1977) Biological Insect Pest Suppression. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daramola, A. M. (1984) The insect pest complex of edible roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa var. sabdariffa L. and the damage they cause in southern Nigeria. Nigerian J. Ent. 5, 62–69.Google Scholar
Debach, P. and Smith, H. S. (1947) The effect of host density on the rate of reproduction of entomophagous parasites. J. Econ. Ent. 34, 741–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Don-Pedro, K. N. (1980) A population explosion of Aphis craccivora following DDT application in a cowpea plot, Vigna unguiculata cultivar (Prima) in Nigeria. J. Nat. Hist. 14, 617–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. W. and Dixon, A. F. G. (1986) Cues for oviposition by ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae): Response to aphids. J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 1027–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firempong, S. and Kumar, R. (1975) Natural enemies of Toxoptera aurantii (Boy). (Homoptera: Aphididae) on cocoa in Ghana. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 7, 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. S. (1983) Agricultural Insect Pests of the Tropics and Their Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodek, I. (1973) Biology of Coccinellidae. Academia, Prague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Ent. 91, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1966) The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 48, 1–86.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., Messenger, P. S. and Debach, P. (1971) The natural enemy component in natural control and the theory of biological control. In Biological Control (Edited by Huffaker, C. B.), pp. 16–67. Plenum Press, New York-London.Google Scholar
Ives, P. M. (1981) Feeding and egg production of two species of coccinellids in the laboratory. Can. Ent. 113, 999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. and Daoust, R. A. (1986) Insect pests of cowpeas. A. Rev. Ent. 31, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, N. J. (1981) Some aspects of the rate of increase of a coccinellid. Ecol. Ent. 6, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, N. J. (1982) Voracity, cannibalism and coccinellid predation. Ann. appl. Biol. 101, 144–148.Google Scholar
Ofuya, T. I. (1986) Predation by Cheilomenes vicina (Coleoptera; Coccinellidae) on the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora (Homoptera: Aphididae): Effect of prey stage and density. Entomophaga 31, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Jackai, L. E. N. (1985) Insect pests of cowpeas in Africa: Their life cycle, economic importance and potential for control. In Cowpea Research, Production and Utilization, (Edited by Singh, S. R. and Rachie, K. O.), pp. 217–231. John Wiley & Sons, London.Google Scholar
Sweetman, H. L. (1963) The principles of biological control. W. C. Brown, Iowa.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1974) Insects associated with okra, Abelmoschus esculenlus (L.) Moench in Nigeria. Niger, agric. J. 11, 108–112.Google Scholar