Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:22:05.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host plant resistance to insects attacking soybean and mungbean in the tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

N. S. Talekar
Affiliation:
Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC), P.O. Box 42 Shanhua, Tainan 74199, Taiwan, ROC
Get access

Abstract

In the tropics, insect pests cause considerable damage to soybean, Glycine max and mungbean, Vigna radiata from germination until harvest and even in storage. Agromyzid flies in the seedling stage, lepidopterous and coleopterous defoliators in the vegetative and early reproductive stages, pentatomid and coreid bugs and lepidopterous pod-borers in the reproductive stage, and bruchids in storage all cause significant damage. Sources of resistance to agromyzids in mungbean (AVRDC accession V 4281), defoliators (PI 171451, PI 227687, PI 229358) and stink bugs (PI 227687 and PI 171444) in soybean, and bruchids in mungbean (V 2164) are available. In most cases, antibiosis appears to be the major mechanism of resistance. These sources are being exploited in the development of agromyzid-resistant mungbean, defoliator- and stink bug-resistant soybean, and bruchid-resistant mungbean at the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC). Diversity in insect species within a pest complex and, in certain cases, biotypes of single pest at different locations as well as pest ecology are likely to influence the resistance reaction and, in practical terms, the utilization of pest resistance as a tool in the management of insect pests of soybean and mungbean. Greater efforts are required at local level to fully utilize insect pest resistant germplasm.

Résumé

Dans les tropiques, les ravageurs peuvent occasionner des dégâts considérables sur soja (Glycine max) et haricot mungo (Vigna radiata) depuis le semis jusqu'à la récolte et même pendant le stockage. Des dégâts substantiels peuvent être occasionnés par les mouches de la famille Agromyzidae au stade plantule, les lépidoptères et coléoptères défoliateurs pendant le stade végétatif et le début du stade reproductif, les punaises (Pentatomidae et Coreidae) et les lépidoptères s'attaquant aux gousses pendant le stade reproductif, et les bruches pendant le stockage. Il existe des sources de résistance aux mouches Agromyzidae (Entrée de l'AVRDC No V 4281), et aux bruches (V 2164) chez le haricot mungo, et aux défoliateurs (PI 171451, PI 227687, PI 223358) et punaises (PI 227687 et PI 171444) chez le soja. Dans la plupart des cas, la résistance semble être due à un mécanisme d'antibiose. Les sources de résistance sont actuellement exploitées à l'AVRDC en vue de développer des lignées de haricot mungo résistantes aux mouches Agromyzidae et aux bruches et de lignées de soja résistantes aux insectes défoliateurs et aux punaises. La diversité des espèces d'insectes au sein d'un complexe de ravageurs et dans certains cas, de biotypes d'une même espèce ainsi que l'écologie des différentes espèces risque d'influencer la réaction de résistance, et par conséquent, l'utilisation de la résistance varietale comme moyen de lutte contre les ravageurs du soja et du haricot mungo. Des efforts accrus au niveau local sont nécessaires en vue d'utiliser pleinement le germplasme résistant aux ravageurs.

Type
Symposium VIII: Plant Resistance in Tropical Insect Pest Management
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AVRDC (1981) Progress Report for 1979. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC.Google Scholar
AVRDC (1982) 1981 Progress Report. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC.Google Scholar
AVRDC (1984) Progress Report for 1982. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC.Google Scholar
AVRDC (1985) Progress Report for 1983. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC.Google Scholar
AVRDC (1986a) Progress Report for 1984. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC (in Press).Google Scholar
AVRDC (1986b) Progress Report for 1985. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC (in press).Google Scholar
Baker, S. H. and Todd, J. W. (1984) Notice of Insect Resistance Soybean Germplasm. University of Georgia, College of Agriculture, Georgia Experiment Station, Tiflon, USA.Google Scholar
Banto, S. M. and Sanchez, F. F. (1972) The biology and chemical control of Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Philippine Entomologist 2, 167182.Google Scholar
Chiang, H. S. and Talekar, N. S. (1980) Identification of sources of resistance to beanfly and two other agromyzid flies in soybean and mungbean. J. econ. Ent. 73, 197199.Google Scholar
Chiang, H. S. and Norris, D. M. (1983) Morphological and physiological parameters of soybean resistance to agromyzid beanflies. Environ. Ent. 12, 260265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W. J., Harries, F. A., Maxwell, F. G. and Hartwig, E. E. (1972) Resistance of certain soybean cultivars to the bean leaf beetle, striped blister beetle, and bollworm, J. econ. Ent. 65, 16691672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distabanjong, K. and Srinives, P. (1985) Inheritance of beanfly resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 19, 7584.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 141.Google Scholar
Gilman, D. F., McPherson, R. M., Newsom, L. D., Herzogz, D. C. and Williams, C. (1982) Resistance in soybean to the southern green stink bug. Crop Sci. 22, 573576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchett, J. H., Beland, G. L. and Kilen, T. C. (1979) Identification of multiple insect resistant soybean lines. Crop Sci. 19, 557559.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, E. A. (1976) Stink bug complex in soybeans. In Expanding the Use of Soybean. Proceedings of a Conference for Asia and Oceania (Edited by Goodman, R. M.), pp. 173177. INTSOY series No. 10. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.Google Scholar
IITA (1981) Annual Report for 1980. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Kester, K. M., Smith, C. M. and Gilman, D. F. (1984) Mechanisms of resistance in soybean (Glycine max [L] Merrill) genotype PI 171444 to the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Environ. Ent. 13, 12081215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, A., Harnoto, , Iqbal, A. and Hattori, I. (1983) Pod-borer Etiella hobsoni (Butler) of soybean in Indonesia. Central Research Institute for Food Crops, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1979) Biology of Bruchidae. A. Rev. Ent. 24, 449473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talekar, N. S. and Lin, Y. H. (1981) Two sources with differing modes of resistance to Callosobruchus chinensis in mungbean. J. econ. Ent. 74, 639642.Google Scholar
Talekar, N. S. and Chen, B. S. (1983a) Seasonality of insect pests of soybean (Glycine max) and mungbean (Vigna radiata) in Taiwan. J. econ. Ent. 76, 3437.Google Scholar
Talekar, N. S. and Chen, B. S. (1983b) Identification of sources of resistance to lima bean podborer (Etiella zinckenella) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in soybean (Glycine max). J. econ. Ent., 76, 3839.Google Scholar
Talekar, N. S. and Chen, B. S. (1985) The beanfly pest complex of tropical soybean. In. Soybean in Tropical and Subtropical Cropping Systems pp. 257271. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, ROC.Google Scholar
Turnipseed, S. C. and Sullivan, M. J. (1976) Plant resistance in soybean insect management. In World Soybean Research (Edited by Hill, L. D.) pp. 549–56. Inter State Printers and Publishers, Danville, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
Van Duyn, J. W., Turnipseed, S. G. and Maxwell, J. D. (1971) Resistance in soybean to the Mexican bean beetle. I: Sources of resistance. Crop Sci. 16, 227280.Google Scholar