Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:03:04.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of Chilo spp. infesting cereals in Eastern Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

E. M. Minja
E. M. Minja
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Mbita Point Field Station, P. O. Box 30, Mbita, South Nyanza, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

The distribution and existing control measures for three important Chilo spp. (C. partellus, C. orichalcocilliellus and C. sacchariphagus) to cereal crop production in 10 east African countries and their neighbouring Indian Ocean Islands are reviewed. Various cultural, biological, host-plant resistance/tolerance and chemical control methods developed in the past 30 years of cereal research programmes are discussed. Cultural methods are very effective on Chilo spp. control, but are not widely practised. Although several effective natural enemies have been identified for Chilo spp., very few systematic programmes of their utilization have been effected. Several resistant/tolerant maize and sorghum lines have been reported, but they are not yet fully used. Chemical control though effective, has proved rather unsuccessful in traditional agriculture. Suggestions to incorporate these control methods in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programmes for Chilo spp. in different places in the region are given.

Résumé

L'existence et la répartition des mesures de lutte contre les 3 principaux types de Chilo spp. (le C. partellus, le C. orichalcociliellus et le C. sacchariphagus) dans les champs de céréales dans 10 pays de l'Afrique orientale et dans les îles voisines de l'Océan Indien font actuellement l'objet d'une remise en question. Plusieurs méthodes de lutte naturelles, biologiques, chimiques ou de la plante-hôte résistante/tolérante à l'égard du Chilo spp. mises au point tout au long des 30 dernières années de recherche sur les céréales sont de nos jours très discutées. Dans la lutte contre le Chilo spp., les méthodes naturelles/culturales sont très efficaces mais elles ne sont malheureusement pas très répendues. Bien qu'un nombre considérable de véritables ennemis naturels du Chilo spp. ait été identifié, très peu de programmes se sont systèmatiquement engagés à s'en servir. Plusieurs variétés de maïs et de sorgho réputées resistantes ou tolerantes a l'egard de cet insecte ont ete inventoriees mais leur culture n'a vraiment pas été suffisamment répendue.

Quant à la lutte chimique, bien qu'étant reconnue très efficace, elle n'a pas donné de résultats satisfaisants dans le domaine de l'agriculture traditionnelle. Nous avons reçu des suggestions en provenance de différents coins de la région demandant l'insertion de toutes ces méthodes dans le Programme Intégré de Lutte contre les Insectes.

Keywords

Cereal stem borersChilo spp.control methodsculturalbiologicalhost-plant resistancechemicalIntegrated Pest ManagementDévoreurs de tige des céréalesChilo spp.méthodes de lutteculturales/naturellesbiologiquesplante-hôte résistantechimiquesProgramme Intégré de Lutte contre les Insectes
Type
Status and Control of Chilo spp. in Different Regions
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 11 , Special Issue 4-5: Tropical Stem Borers of Graminaceous Crops: A New Synthesis , October 1990 , pp. 489 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alghali, A. M. (1987) Effect of time of Chilo partellus Swinhoe (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) infestation on yield loss and compensatory ability in sorghum cultivars. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) 64, 144–148.Google Scholar
Alio, A. N. (1986) Status of crop and livestock pests in Somalia. In Proc. of the International Working Group on the Implementation of the African Regional Pest Management Research and Development Network (PESTNET) for Integrated Control of Crop and Livestock Pests, Nairobi, Kenya, 22–26 June 1986, pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
Amoako-Atta, B., Omolo, E. O. and Kidega, E. K. (1983) Influence of maize, cowpea and sorghum intercropping systems on stem-/podborer infestations. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 47–57.Google Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O. (1986) Effect of resistant maize cultivars on larval dispersal and establishment of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 103–106.Google Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O., Saxena, K. N., Kibuka, J. G. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1986) Evaluation of some maize cultivars for resistance to the stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Western Kenya. Maydica 31, 379–389.Google Scholar
Appert, J. (1971) Biological control of stem borers of graminaceous crops in Madagascar and the Comoros Islands. Document, Institut de Recherches Agronomiques a Madagascar, No. 272, p. (1) + 26 pp.Google Scholar
Appert, J. and Ranaivosoa, H. (1971) A new success in biological control in Madagascar: Control of maize stem borers by an introduced parasite: Pediobius furvus Ganan. (Hym., Eulophidae). Agron. Trop. 26, 327–331.Google Scholar
Betbeder-Matibet, M. (1971) Biological control of Chilo sacchariphagus the spotted borer of sugar-cane in Madagascar. Agron. Trop. Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 332–336.Google Scholar
Bleszynski, S. (1970) A revision of the world species of Chilo Zinken (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. His.) (Entomol.) 25, 99–195.Google Scholar
Bohlen, E. (1978) Crop pests in Tanzania and their control. German Agency for Technical Cooperation, Ltd. (GTZ) Second Edition.Google Scholar
Coaker, T. H. (1956) An experiment on stem borer control on maize. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 21, 220—221.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. and Kidiavai, E. L. (1983) Resistance of some sorghum lines to the spotted stalk-borer Chilo partellus under Western Kenya conditions. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 119–126.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerden, J. C. (1953) Stem borers of cereal crops at Kongwa, Tanganyika, 1950–1952. E. Afr. Agric. J. 19, 105–119.Google Scholar
Etienne, J. (1972) Introduction of Eulophidae into Reunion Island for the control of sugar-cane borers. In Proc. of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists (Edited by Henderson, M. T.), pp. 387–392. Fourteenth Congress, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 22-November 5, 1971, New Orleans, USA.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1960) Studies of intercropping. 1—;Maize or sorghum with groundnuts. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 26, 1–10.Google Scholar
Farrag, Y. H. A. (1986) Food crop pests in Sudan. In Proc. of the International Working Group on the Implementation of the African Regional Pest Management Research and Development Network (PESTNET)for Integrated Control of Crop and Livestock Pests, Nairobi, Kenya, 22–26 June 1986.Google Scholar
Gebrekidan, B. (1981) Ethiopian Sorghum Improvement Project Report No. 9. Addis Ababa University and Instituteof Agricultural Research, Nazareth, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Girling, D. J. (1978) The distribution and biology of Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its relationship to other stem-borers in Uganda. Bull. entomol. Res. 68, 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncalves, M. L. (1972) The pink maize borer, Sesamia calamistis Hampson, in Mozambique (Contribution to its study). Agron. Mocambicana 6, 253–258.Google Scholar
Harris, K. M. (1985) Lepidopterous stem borers of sorghum. In Proc. of the International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University. College Station, TX USA. ICRISAT Patancheru, India.Google Scholar
Haseman, L. (1946) Influence of soil minerals on insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 39, 8–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, D. S. (1975) Agricultural Insect Pests of the Tropics and Their Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. R. (1958) The lepidopterous stalk borers associated with Gramineae in Uganda. Bull. entomol. Res. 49, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, W. R. (1983) Biological control of graminaceous stem borers and legume pod borers. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 205–209.Google Scholar
Jepson, W. F. (1954) A critical review of the world literature on the lepidopterous stalk borers of tropical graminaceous crops. Commonw. Inst. Entomol. London.Google Scholar
Kato, D., Karel, A. K. and Ndunguru, B. J. (1982) Effect of insecticide spray on insect pests and yield of sorghum and simsim in pure stand and in intercropping—summary. In Proc. of the Second Symposium on Intercropping in Semi-Arid Areas, Morogoro, Tanzania, 4–7 August 1980. Ottawa, Ontario, IDRC-186e. pp. 117–118.Google Scholar
Lawani, S. M. (1982) A review of the effects of various agronomic practices on cereal stem borer populations. Trop. Pest Manage. 28, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallya, G. A. (1985) Maize entomology. In National Maize Research Programme 1984–1985. Progress Report Presented to National Maize Research Coordinating Committee by A. J. Moshi, 4 November 1985, pp. 41–43.Google Scholar
Mallya, G. A. (1986) Maize entomology. In Maize Improvement Project Progress Report 1985–1986, Uyole Agricultural Centre, Mbeya, Tanzania, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Marandu, W. Y. F., Temu, A. E. M. and Kabungo, D. (1987) Plant protection. In Maize Improvement Programme Annual Progress Report, 1987, p. 3. Uyole Agricultural Centre, Mbeya, Tanzania.Google Scholar
Mathez, F. C (1972) Chilo partellus Swinh., C. orichalcociliella Strand. (Lep., Crambidae) and Sesamia calamistis Hmps (Lep., Noctuidae) on maize in the Coast Province, Kenya. Mitt. der Schweize. Entomol. Ges. 45, 167–189.Google Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. (1972) Distribution, biology and ecology of Dentichasmias busseolae Heinr. (Hym., Ichneumonidae), a pupal parasite of graminaceous stem borers (Lep., Pyralidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 62, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. and Greathead, D. J. (1970) An annotated list of the parasites of graminaceous stem borers in East Africa, with a discussion of their potential in biological control. Entomophaga 15, 241–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukuru, S. Z., Mushonga, J. N. and Murty, D. S. (1982) Sorghum ugali. In Proc. of the International Symposium on Sorghum Grain Quality, 28–31 October 1981, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Odindo, M. O. (1985) Nosema sp. as a bio-control agent. ICIPE Thirteenth Annu. Rep. 1985, p. 17.Google Scholar
Ogwaro, K. (1983) Intensity levels of stem borers in maize and sorghum and the effect on yield under different intercropping patterns. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 33–37.Google Scholar
Omolo, E. O. (1983) Screening of local and exotic maize lines for stem borer resistance with special reference to Chilo par te l lus. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 105–108.Google Scholar
Omolo, E. O. and Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1985a) Screening maize genotypes for multiple resistance to stem borers. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 405–408.Google Scholar
Omolo, E.O. and Seshu, Reddy K. V.(1985b) Effect of different sorghum-based cropping systems on insect pests in Kenya. In Proc. of the International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX USA, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 395–401.Google Scholar
Scheites, P. (1978) Ecological and physiological aspee t of aestivation-diapause in the larvae of two Pyralid stalk borers of maize in Kenya. Ph. D. Thesis Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Schmutterer, H. (1969) Pests of Crops in Northeast and Central Africa. Gustav. Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1983) Studies on the stem-borer complex of sorghum in Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 3–10.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1985a) Relative susceptibility and resistance of some sorghum lines to stem-borers in Western Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 401–404.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1985b) Sorghum (Serena) yield loss due to Chilo partellus infestation. ICIPE Thirteenth Annu. Rep. 1985. p. 6.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1985c) Integrated approach to the control of sorghum stem borers. In Proc. of the International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 205–215.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. and Omolo, E. O. (1985) Sorghum insect pest situation in Eastern Africa. In Proc. of the International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
Siddiq, S. A. (1972) Graminaceous stem borers in Northern Province of the Sudan. 1. Ecological studies. J. Appi. Entomol. 71, 376–381.Google Scholar
Starks, K. J. (1969) Some cereal crop insects in East Africa. E. Afr. Agrie. For. Res. Org. Serere Research Station, Kampala, Uganda.Google Scholar
Starks, K. J. and Dogget, H. (1970) Resistance to a spotted stem borer in sorghum and maize. J. econ. Entomol. 63, 1790–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starks, K.J., Schumaker, G. and Eberhart, S. A. (1971) Soil fertility and damage by Chilo zonellus to grain sorghum. J. econ. Entomol. 64, 740–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. and Way, M. J. (1970) Ecological background to pest management. In Concepts of Pest Management (Edited by Rabb, R. L. and Guthrie, F. E.) pp. 6–29, North Carolina State University Press, Raleigh, North Carolina, pp. 6–29, 1970.Google Scholar
Swaine, G. (1957) The maize and sorghum stalk borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) in peasant agriculture in Tanganyika Territory. Bull. entomol. Res. 48, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadasse, A. (1987) Insect problems on sorghum in Ethiopia and strategies for their control. PESTNET Today 2, 3–4.Google Scholar
Warui, C. M. and Kuria, J. N. (1983) Population incidence and the control of maize stalk-borers Chilo partellus (Swinh.), C. orichalcociliella Strand. and Sesamia calamistis Hmps. in Coast Province, Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 11–18.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R. (1983) The sugar cane stem borer (Chilo sacchariphagus) in Mauritius. Sugarcane Industry Research Institute Reduit, Mauritius. 62, 1, 5–23.Google Scholar