Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:36:39.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Megalothorax laevis (Neelipleona, Neelidae): Account of a neglected springtail widely distributed in the intertropical zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

C. Schneider*
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Department Systematics & Evolution, MECADEV, Paris 75005, France
S. D. Zon
Affiliation:
UFR Biosciences, Laboratoire de Zoologie et de Biologie Animale, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny de Cocody, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
C. A. D'Haese
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Department Systematics & Evolution, MECADEV, Paris 75005, France
*
Get access

Abstract

The springtail Megalothorax laevis Denis, 1948 is redescribed from a broad sampling in the intertropical zone: Vietnam (including type locality), Ivory Coast, Gabon, Réunion island and French Guiana. Pseudopore-like elements are for the first time reported on the trunk and legs of Megalothorax species. New molecular data for M. laevis (16S rDNA, 28S rDNA d1 and d2 and COI Barcode) are provided. The phylogenetic position of the species within the Megalothorax genus is analysed. Megalothorax laevis belongs to the incertus group but shares similitudes with the minimus group acquired through evolutionary convergences (such as smooth lamellae of the mucro). Those similitudes might have created confusion between M. minimus and M. laevis. While M. minimus used to be regarded cosmopolitan, M. laevis has been overlooked since its original discovery. However, the present sampling led us to believe that M. laevis replace M. minimus as the commonest edaphic Megalothorax species in the intertropical zone. A key to the Megalothorax species with smooth mucro lamellae is provided.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © icipe 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrantes, E. A., Bellini, B. C., Bernardo, A. N., Fernandes, L. H., Mendonça, M. C., Oliveira, E. P., Queiroz, G. C., Sautter, K. D., Silveira, T. C. and Zeppelini, D. (2010) Synthesis of Brazilian Collembola: An update to the species list. Zootaxa 2388, 122.Google Scholar
Arpin, P., Kilbertus, G., Ponge, J.-F. and Vannier, G. (1980) Importance de la microflore et de la microfaune en milieu forestier, pp. 87150. In Actualités d'écologie Forestière: Sol, Flore, Faune (edited by Pesson, P.). Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 517 pp.Google Scholar
Bonet, F. (1944) Sobre el género Metasinella Denis, y algunos otros colembolos cavernicolas de Cubad. Ciencia 5, 1724.Google Scholar
Bonet, F. (1947) Monografia de la familia Neelidae (Collembola). Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 8, 131192.Google Scholar
Christian, E. (1998) Megalothorax sanctistephani sp.n. (Insecta: Collembola: Neelidae) from the catacombs of St. Stephen's Cathedral, Vienna. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien 100B, 1518.Google Scholar
Christiansen, K. A. and Bellinger, P. F. (Eds) (1992) Insects of Hawaii, vol. 15, Collembola. University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu. 445 pp.Google Scholar
Copley, J. (2000) Ecology goes underground. Nature 406, 452454.Google Scholar
Deharveng, L. (1978) Collemboles cavernicoles. 1. – Grottes de l'Aguzou (France: Aude). Extrait du Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 114, 393403.Google Scholar
Deharveng, L. and Beruete, E. (1993) Megalothorax tuberculatus n. sp., nouveau troglobie des Pyrénées-Atlantiques (France) et de Navarre (Espagne) (Collembola, Neelidae). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France 98, 1518.Google Scholar
Deharveng, L., Bedos, A., Le C. K., Le C. M. and Truong, Q. T. (2009) Endemic arthropods of the Hon Chong hills (Kiên Giang), an unrivaled biodiversity heritage in Southeast Asia, pp. 3157. In Beleaguered Hills: Managing the Biodiversity of the Remaining Karst Hills of Kien Giang, Vietnam (edited by Le, C. K., Truong, Q. T. and Ly, N. S.). Ho Chi Minh Publications, Nha Xuat Ban Nong Nghiep, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Delamare Deboutteville, C. (1950) Recherches écologiques sur la microfaune du sol des pays tempérés et tropicaux. PhD thesis. Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Paris.Google Scholar
Delamare Deboutteville, C. and Massoud, Z. (1963) Collemboles Symphypléones, pp. 169289. In Biologie de l'Amérique Australe, vol. II (edited by Deboutteville, C. Delamare and Rapoport, E.). Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 399 pp.Google Scholar
Denis, J. R. (1948) Collemboles d'Indochine. Notes d'Entomologie Chinoise 12, 183311.Google Scholar
Filser, J. (2002) The role of Collembola in carbon and nitrogen cycling in soil. Pedobiologia 46, 234245.Google Scholar
Fjellberg, A. (1998/99) The labial palp in Collembola. Zoologischer Anzeiger – A Journal of Comparative Zoology 237, 309330.Google Scholar
Fjellberg, A. (2007) The Collembola of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part II: Entomobryomorpha and Symphypleona. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavia 42, 1264.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P. A. (1999) Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: Solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15, 415428.Google Scholar
Greenslade, P., Stevens, M. I., Torricelli, G. and D'Haese, C. A. (2011) An ancient Antarctic endemic genus restored: Morphological and molecular support for Gomphiocephalus hodgsoni (Collembola: Hypogastruridae). Systematic Entomology 36, 223240.Google Scholar
Hüther, W. (1967) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Collembolenfauna des Sudans. II. Allgemeiner Teil und Symphypleona. Senckenbergiana Biologica 48, 221267.Google Scholar
Kováč, Ľ. and Papáč, V. (2010) Revision of the genus Neelus Folsom, 1896 (Collembola, Neelida) with the description of two new troglobiotic species from Europe. Zootaxa 2663, 3652.Google Scholar
MacFadyen, A. (1963) The contribution of the fauna to the total soil metabolism, pp. 317. In Soil Organisms (edited by Doeksen, J. and Drift, J. Van Der). North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Machado, D. J. (2015) YBYRÁ facilitates comparison of large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics 16, 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0642-9.Google Scholar
Mickevich, M. F. and Farris, J. S. (1981) The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30, 351370.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C., Walter, D. E. and Hunt, H. W. (1988) Arthropod regulation of micro- and mesobiota in below-ground detrital food webs. Annual Review of Entomology 33, 419435.Google Scholar
Nixon, K. C. (1999) The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407414.Google Scholar
Papáč, V. and Kováč, L. (2013) Four new troglobiotic species of the genus Megalothorax Willem, 1900 (Collembola: Neelipleona) from the Carpathian Mountains (Slovakia, Romania). Zootaxa 3737, 545575.Google Scholar
Papáč, V. and Palacios-Vargas, J. G. (2016) A new genus of Neelidae (Collembola) from Mexican caves. ZooKeys 569, 3751.Google Scholar
Papáč, V., Lukić, M. and Kováč, L. (2016) Genus Neelus Folsom, 1896 (Hexapoda, Collembola) reveals its diversity in cave habitats: Two new species from Croatia. Zootaxa 4088, 051075.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. (1988) Linkages between resource availability, microorganisms and soil invertebrates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 24, 2132.Google Scholar
Petersen, H. and Luxton, M. (1982) A comparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos 39, 287388.Google Scholar
Ponge, J. F. (1991) Food resources and diets of soil animals in a small area of Scots pine litter. Geoderma 49, 3362.Google Scholar
Prabhoo, N. R. (1971) Soil and litter Collembola of South India. II-Symphypleona. Oriental Insects 5, 243262.Google Scholar
Rusek, J. (1987) New types of linea ventralis in Collembola and its function, pp. 699706. In Soil Fauna and Soil Fertility: Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Soil Zoology August 1985, Moscow (edited by Striganova, B. R.), Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. T. (1951) Some Collembola from Malaya. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Series B, Taxonomy 20, 131141.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. and D'Haese, C. A. (2013) Morphological and molecular insights on Megalothorax: The largest Neelipleona genus revisited (Collembola). Invertebrate Systematics 27, 317364.Google Scholar
Schneider, C., Cruaud, C. and D'Haese, C. A. (2011) Unexpected diversity in Neelipleona revealed by molecular phylogeny approach (Hexapoda, Collembola). Soil Organisms 83, 383398.Google Scholar
Schneider, C., Porco, D. and Deharveng, L. (2016) Two new Megalothorax species of the minimus group (Collembola, Neelidae). ZooKeys 554, 3768.Google Scholar
Seastedt, T. R. (1984) The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annual Review of Entomology 29, 2546.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. I. and D'Haese, C. A. (2014) Islands in ice: Isolated populations of Cryptopygus sverdrupi (Collembola) among nunataks in the Sør Rondane Mountains, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Biodiversity 15, 169177.Google Scholar
Stork, N. E. (1988) Insect diversity: Facts, fiction and speculation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35, 321337.Google Scholar
Stork, N. E. and Blackburn, T. M. (1993) Abundance, body size and biomass of arthropods in tropical forest. Oikos 67, 483489.Google Scholar
Vannier, G. and Massoud, Z. (1967) Productions cireuses chez les Collemboles Neelidae. Revue d’Écologie et de Biologie du Sol 4, 123130.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C. (1995) Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Systematic Biology 44, 321331.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C. (1996) Optimization alignment: The end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12, 19.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C. (2003) Iterative pass optimization of sequence data. Cladistics 19, 254260.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C., Lucaroni, N., Hong, L., Crowley, L. M. and Varón, A. (2015) POY version 5: Phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies under multiple optimality criteria. Cladistics 31, 189196.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Schneider supplementary material

Schneider supplementary material

Download Schneider supplementary material(File)
File 2.3 MB