Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:15:44.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mise en evidence de la pheromone sexuelle chez les femelles de Blattella germanica L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

P. G. Tokro
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Zoologie, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France
R. Brossut
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Zoologie, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France
L. Sreng
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Zoologie, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France
Get access

Abstract

A volatile female sex pheromone, secreted by the pygidial glands of Blattlla germaniea, which attracts males from a distance was studied. Ultrastructural studies showed common epidermal and canal cells associated with glandular cells, classified as class 3 secretory unit The thickness of pygidial glands from young virgin females Increased progressively and became larger, 10 to 13 days after adult emergence. It decreased markedly after mating and increased again after the release of the ootheca. Based on the morphology of the glands, it was further observed that B. germaniea young virgin females' attractiveness increased gradually, such attractiveness decreased at mating. After larval emergence, females' attractiveness wasonce more enhanced. Dkhktromethane extracts of pygidial glands attracted males from a distance. These results demonstrate the pheromone gradual secretion and similarly pygidial glands evolution during adult emergence.

Résumé

L'existence d'une phéromone sexuelle femelle attractive à distance et produite par ies glandes pygidiales cbez B. germaniea a été démontrée. L'ultrastructure de l'épithélium glandulaire a montré des cellules épidermiques banales et des cellules du canal assodées À des cellules sécrétrices, formant les unités glandulaires de classe 3. Chez la jeune femelle vlerge, la couche glandulaire est de faible épaisseur, elk augmente progressivement et atteint son maximun entre les 10 eme et 13ème jours. Pendant la gestation, elle diminue considérablement pub reprend sa croissance après le rejet de l'oothèque. L'attraction des femelles de B. germaniea est progressive, elle devient faible pendant la gestation puis les femelles redeviennent plus attractives après l'éclosion des larves. Un extrait de pygidium, realise à partir du dlchlorométhane est aussl attractive qu'une femelle vierge. Ces différents résultats démontrent revolution progressive, de remission de la phéromone et celle des glandes pygldials au cours de la vie imaginale.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, W. A. and Ellis, R. A. (1965) Ultrastructure of Trypanosoma lewisi: flagellum, microtubules and kinetoplas. J. Protozool. 12, 483499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, R. H. Jr (1968) The comparative physiology of reproduction processes in cockroaches. I. Mating behaviour and its endocrine control. Adv. Reprod. Physiol. 3, 167207.Google Scholar
Barth, R. H. Jr (1970) The mating behaviour of Periplaneta americana L and Blatta orientals L with notes on three additional species of Periplaneta and interspecific action of female sex pheromone. Z. Tierpsychol. 27, 722748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W. J., Vuturo, S. B. and Bennett, M. (1978) Endokinetic turning and programmed courtship acts of die male german cockroach. J. Insect Physiol. 24, 369374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossut, R. (1973) Evolution du système glandulaire exocrine céphalique des Blattaria et des Isoptera. Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 2, 3554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossut, R., Dubois, P., Rigaud, J. et Sreng, L. (1975) Etude biochimique de la secretion des glandes tergales des Blattaria. Insect Biochem. 5, 719732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossut, R. et Roth, L. M. (1977) Tergal modifications associated with abdominal glandular cells in the Blattaria. J. Morphol. 151, 259298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brossut, R. et Sreng, L. (1980) Ultrastructure comparée des glandes exocrines abdominales des Blattaria (Dictyoptera). Int. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 9, 199213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgstahler, A. W., Weigel, L. O., Bell, W. J. et Rust, M. K. (1975) Synthesis of the german cockroach sexuel contact pheromone 3, ll-dimethyl-2-nonacosanone. J. Org. Chem. 4è, 34563458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgstahler, A. W., Weigel, L. O., Sanders, M. E., Shaefer, C. G., Bell, W. J. et Vuturo, S. B. (1977) Synthesis and activity of 29-hydroxy-3, ll-dimethyl-2-nonacosanone, component B of the german cockroach sex pheromone. J. Org. Chem. 42, 566568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dusham, E. H. (1918) The dorsal pygidial glands of the female cockroach, Blattella germanica. Can. Entomol. 50, 278280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabe, M. (1968) Techniques Histologiques (Edited by Masson, et Cie, ), pp. 1113. Paris.Google Scholar
Karlson, P. et Butenandt, A. (1959) Pheromones (Ectohormones) in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 4, 3958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnovsky, M. J. (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixation of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 27, 137 A.Google Scholar
Martoja, R. et Martoja, M. (1967) Initiation aux Techniques de l'Histologie Animate (Edited by Masson, et Cie, ), pp. 345. Paris.Google Scholar
Mckittrick, F. A. (1964) Evolutionary studies of cockroaches. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Mem. USA. 389, 1197.Google Scholar
Moore, J. K. et Barth, R. H. (1976) Studies on the site of sex pheromone production in the cockroach Byrsotria fumigata. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69, 911916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, R. et Fukami, H. (1981) The wing-raising pheromoneof the german cockroach. In Advances in Natural Products Chemistry: Extraction and Isolation of Biologically Active Compounds. (Edited by Ikekawa, N. and Suzuki, M.), pp. 444457. Halsted Press, USA.Google Scholar
Nishida, R., Sato, R., Kuwahara, Y., Fukami, H. et Ishii, S. (1976) Female sex pheromone of the german cockroach B. germanica L (Orthoptera: Blattellidae) responsible for male wing-raising. II. 29-hydroxy-3, 11 dimethyl-2-nonacosanone. J. Chem. Ecol. 2, 449455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noirot, C. et Quennedey, A. (1974) Fine structure of epidermal glands. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19, 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persoons, C. J. et Ritter, F. J. (1979) Pheromones of cockroaches. In Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals (Edited by Ritter, F. J.), pp. 225237. North Holl and Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Quennedey, A. et Brossut, R. (1975) Les glandes mandibulaires de Blaberus craniifer Burm. (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae), développement, structure et fonctionnement. Tissue Cell 7, 503517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. (1962) Hypersexual activity induced in femalés of the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea. Science 138, 12671269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, L. M. (1964a) Control of reproduction in female cockroaches with special reference to Nauphoeta cinerea. I. First preoviposition period. J. Insect Physiol. 10, 915945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. (1964b) Control of reproduction in female cockroaches with special reference to Nauphoeta cinerea. II. Gestation andpostparturition. Psyche 71, 198243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. (1969) The evolution of male tergal glands in the Blattaria. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 62, 176208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. (1970) Evolution and taxonomic significance of reproduction in Blattaria. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 15, 7596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. (1971) The nude genitalia of Blattaria. VI. Blaberidae, Oxyhaloinae. Psyche 78, 84106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. et Willis, E. R. (1952) Astudy of cockroach behaviour. Am. Mid. Nat. 47, 66129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreng, L. (1979) Ultrastrucnireetchimiede la sécrétion des glandes tergales du male de Blattella germanica L (Dictyoptère: Blattellidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 8, 213227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreng, L. (1983) Comportement sexuel et communication chimique chez les Mattes. Cas de Nauphoeta et des genres voisins. Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat. Université de Dijon.Google Scholar
Sreng, L. et Quennedey, A. (1976) Role of a temporary ciliary structure in the morphogenesis of insect glands: an electron microscope study of the glands of male Blattella germanica L. (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae). J. Ultr. Res. 56, 7895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talman, E., Verwiel, P. E. J., Ritter, F. J. et Persoons, C. J. (1978) Sex pheromones of the american cockroach Periplaneta americana. Israel. J. Chem. 17, 227235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, E. R. (1970) Mating behaviour of three cockroaches (Latiblattella) from Honduras. Biotropica 2, 120128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar