Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:25:33.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-host status of papaya cultivars to the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in relation to the degree of fruit ripeness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2016

Domingos Cugala ,
João Jone Jordane  and
Sunday Ekesi
Domingos Cugala*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agronomy and Forest Engineering, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique
João Jone Jordane
Affiliation:
National Fruit Fly Laboratory, Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Food Security, Chimoio, Manica Province, Mozambique
Sunday Ekesi
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), PO Box 30772-00100 Nairobi, Kenya
*
*E-mail: dcugala@uem.mz
Get access

Abstract

Phytosanitary measures are a major barrier to trade in papaya. We assessed the infestation of tephritid fruit flies on different stages of maturity of papaya, to determine its non-host stage of maturity, for market access. Papaya fruits were collected from Kilifi and Embu counties, Kenya from March 2013 to December 2014, to assess the level of infestation by fruit flies according to the degree of fruit ripening. In all locations, no fruit fly infestation was recorded on papaya when fruits were at the 0, 25 and 50% yellow fruit ripening stage. Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) was, however, observed attacking fruits when papaya fruits were at 75 and 100% all yellow (fully ripe fruit ripening stage) with infestations of 0.19−0.51 B. dorsalis/kg fruit and 0.24−1.24 B. dorsalis/kg fruit, respectively, in all locations. Field cage exposure of B. dorsalis to fruits of five papaya cultivars—‘Papino’, ‘Neo Essence’, ‘Sunrise Solo’, ‘Tainung No. 1’ and ‘Tainung No. 2’ in Manica Province, Mozambique—showed that B. dorsalis did not infest fruits at 0, 25 and 50% yellow ripening stages at the densities of 50 and 100 flies per cage. However, at 75% yellow ripening stage, up to 13.1 pupae/kg of fruits was recorded at a density of 150 flies per cage in Tainung No. 1, and infestation ranged from 4.5 to 136 pupae/kg fruits at 100% yellow ripening stage across all the cultivars and infestation densities. Laboratory evaluation of volatiles emanating from freshly crushed papaya pulp of four cultivars: ‘Sunrise Solo’, ‘Red Lady’, ‘Papayi’ and ‘Apoyo’ on egg viability of B. dorsalis showed that at 0, 25 and 50% yellow, egg hatchability was inhibited, suggesting that semiochemical compounds present in green tissues of papaya prevent egg development, although this effect was variable across the four cultivars and ripening stages. Export papaya is harvested at less than 40% yellow ripening stage. Our results, therefore, suggest that quarantine treatment for fruits at this ripening stage is inconsequential, as B. dorsalis does not infest papaya fruits at this stage; thus, authorities should permit entry of these papaya cultivars of less than 40% yellow ripening stage to quarantine-sensitive markets.

Keywords

Papayaripening stagesnon-hostfruit fliesBactrocera dorsalis
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 19 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © icipe 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M., Diaz-Fleischer, F. and Arredondo, J. (2004) Nonhost status of commercial Persea americana ‘Hass’ to Anastrepha ludens, Anastrepha obliqua, Anastrepha serpentina and Anastrepha striata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 293–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aluja, M. and Mangan, R. L. (2008) Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) host status determination: critical conceptual, methodological, and regulatory considerations. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 473–502.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. W. (1983) Infestation biology of three fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species on ‘Brazilian,’ ‘Valery,’ and ‘William's’ cultivars of banana in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 539–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. W. (1994) Commodity resistance to infestation by quarantine pests, pp. 199–211. In Quarantine Treatments for Pests of Food Plants (edited by Sharp, J. L. and Hallman, G. J.). Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. W. (2001) Quarantine security of bananas at harvest maturity against Mediterranean and Oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 94, 302–314.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. W. and Jang, E. B. (1997) An overview of present and future fruit fly research in Hawaii and the US mainland, pp. 30–42. In Management of Fruit Flies in the Pacific: A Regional Symposium (edited by Allwood, A. J. and Drew, R. A. I.). Nadi, Fiji 28–31 October 1996. ACIAR Proceedings No. 76.Google Scholar
Asudi, G. O. (2010) Collection, morphological and molecular characterization of papaya germplasm in Kenya. MSc Thesis. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi. 99 pp.Google Scholar
Back, E. A. and Pemberton, C. E. (1917) The melon fly in Hawaii. Bulletin of the US Department of Agriculture 491, 1–64.Google Scholar
Christenson, L. D. and Foote, R. H. (1960) Biology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 5, 171−192.Google Scholar
Cowley, J. M., Baker, R. T. and Harte, D. S. (1992) Definition and determination of host status for multivoltine fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species. Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cugala, D., Ekesi, S., Ambasse, D., Adamu, R. S. and Mohamed, S. A. (2014) Assessment of ripening stages of Cavendish dwarf bananas as host or non-host to Bactrocera invadens . Journal of Applied Entomology 138, 449−457.Google Scholar
De la Cruz Medina, J., Gutiérrez, G. V. and García, H. S. (2003) Papaya Post-harvest Operations: INPhO Post-Harvest Compendium. FAO, Rome. 70 pp.Google Scholar
De Meyer, M., Delatte, H., Mwatawala, M., Quilici, S., Vayssières, J. F. and Virgilio, M. (2015) A review of the current knowledge on Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Africa, with a list of species included in Zeugodacus . ZooKeys 540, 539–557. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.540.9672.Google Scholar
De Meyer, M. and Ekesi, S. (2016) Exotic invasive fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): in and out of Africa, pp. 127–150. In Fruit Fly Research and Development in Africa—Towards a Sustainable Management Strategy to Improve Horticulture (edited by Ekesi, S., Mohamed, S. A. and De Meyer, M.). Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Dong, Y.-J., Song, C.-W., Chuang, Y.-Y., Chiang, K.-S., Wu, W.-J., Cheng, L.-L. and Chen, C.-C. (2011) Degree of fruit ripeness affecting infestation of papaya by two species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Research 60, 253–262.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S. and Billah, M. K. (2007) A Field Guide to the Management of Economically Important Tephritid Fruit Flies in Africa. icipe, Nairobi, Kenya. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S., De Meyer, M., Mohamed, S. A., Virgilio, M. and Borgemeister, C. (2016) Taxonomy, ecology and management of native and exotic fruit fly species in Africa. Annual Review of Entomology 61, 219–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023603.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S., Nderitu, P. W. and Chang, C. L. (2007) Adaptation to and small-scale rearing of invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) on artificial diet. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 100, 562–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT (2013). FAO Statistical Database. www.fao.org/waicent/portal/statistics_en.asp (Accessed 1 September 2016).Google Scholar
Flath, R. A and Forrey, R. R. (1977) Volatile components of papaya (Carica papaya L. Solo variety). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25, 103−109. doi: 10.1021/jf60209a051.Google Scholar
Flitters, N. E., Miyabara, F., Nakagawa, S. and Dresner, E. (1953) The status of commercial pineapples as hosts of the oriental fruit fly in Hawaii. In Special Report Ho-1: Fruit Fly Investigations in Hawaii. US Department of Agriculture, Entomology Research Branch, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
GEPC [Ghana Export Promotion Council] (2000) Ghana export performance, non-traditional exports, 1995−1999. Ghana Export Promotion Council, Accra, Ghana.Google Scholar
Hennessey, M. K., Knight, R. J. Jr and Schnell, R. J. (1995) Antibiosis to Caribbean fruit fly in avocado germplasm. HortScience 30, 1061–1062.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, E. P, Strong, F. M. and Morgan, D. G. (1962) Naturally occurring insecticides, identification of 2-phenylethyliosthiocyanate as an insecticide occurring naturally in the edible part of turnips. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 10, 30–33. doi: 10.1021/jf60119a009.Google Scholar
Liquido, N. J., Cunningham, R. T. and Couey, H. M. (1989) Infestation rates of papaya by fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to the degree of fruit ripeness. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 213–218.Google Scholar
Lux, S. A., Copeland, R. S., White, I. M., Manrakhan, A. and Billah, M. K. (2003) A new invasive fruit fly species from the Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) group detected in East Africa. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 23, 355−361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S174275840001242X.Google Scholar
Mwatawala, M. W., De Meyer, D., Makundi, R. H. and Maerere, A. P. (2006) Seasonality and host utilization of the invasive fruit fly, Bactrocera invadens (Dipt., Tephritidae) in central Tanzania. Journal of Applied Entomology 130, 530–537.Google Scholar
Nguyen, R., Gillis, S. and Harris, D. (1993) ‘Solo’ Sunrise papaya as a host of the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew), under field and laboratory conditions. Proceedings of the Florida Horticultural Society 106, 118–119.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2001) SAS state software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Seo, S. T. and Tang, C.-S. (1982) Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): toxicity of benzyl isothiocyanate against eggs or 1st instars of three species. Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 1132–1135.Google Scholar
Seo, S. T., Tang, C.-S., Sanidad, S. and Takenaka, T. H. (1983) Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): variation of index of infestation with benzyl isothiocyanate concentration and color of maturing papaya. Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 535–538.Google Scholar
Syed, R. A. (1971) Studies on trypetids and their natural enemies in West Pakistan. V. Dacus (Strumeta) cucurbitae Coquillett. Technical Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 14, 63–75.Google Scholar
Tang, C. S., Syed, M. M. and Hamilton, R. A. (1972) Benzyl isothiocyanate in the Caricaceae. Phytochemistry 11, 2531–2533.Google Scholar
Willard, H. F., Mason, A. C. and Fullaway, D. T. (1929) Susceptibility of avocados of the Guatemala race to attack by the Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii. Hawaiian Forester and Agriculturist 26, 171–176.Google Scholar