Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:39:03.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Non-Parametric Description of the Oviposition Pattern of Zabrotes subfasciatus Inside Pods of a Wild, Phaseolus lunatus, and a Cultivated Host Plant, Phaseolus vulgaris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Michel P. Pimbert  and
Marc Jarry
Michel P. Pimbert
Affiliation:
Institut de Biocénotique Expérimentale des Agrosystèmes, UA CNRS 340 Université F. Rabelais, Pare Grandmont, TOURS 37200, France
Marc Jarry
Affiliation:
Institut de Biocénotique Expérimentale des Agrosystèmes, UA CNRS 340 Université de Pau, Campus Universitaire, PAU 64000, France
Get access

Abstract

Non-parametric statistics were used to describe the spatial distribution of eggs laid by Zabrotes subfasciatus Boh. (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) inside pods of wild Phaseolus lunatus and cultivated P. vulgaris. Eggs tended to be uniformly distributed among seeds inside the pods of P. lunatus whereas egg distribution patterns were random or aggregative inside P. vulgaris pods. These differences were explained in terms of the internal pod morphology of the two host plants. It was concluded that this bruchid normally oviposits uniformly among accessible seeds inside the pods of its host plants in the wild.

Résumé

Des tests non-paramétriques sont employes pour décrire la distribution spatiale des pontes de Zabrotes subfasciatus Boh. à l'intérieur des gousses de Phaseolus lunatus sauvage et de Phaseolus vulgaris cultivé. Les pontes ont tendance à ètre réparties de manière uniforme sur les graines disponibles dans les gousses de P. lunatus. Par contre, les distributions observées à l'intérieur des gousses de P. vulgaris sont aléatoires ou présentent mëme différents degrés d'agrégativité. Ces differences s'expliquent en termes de la morphologie interne des gousses des deux plantes hôtes. On en conclue que la distribution spatiale des pontes de ce bruchidé à l'intérieur des gousses contaminées est normalement uniforme dans la nature.

Keywords

Zabrotes subfasciatusPhaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus lunatusegg distributionspatial pattern
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 113 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arora, and Pajni, H. R. (1957) Some observations on the biology and oviposition of Bruchus analis F. (Bruchidae— Coleoptera). Res. Bull. Panjab. Univ. Zool. 128, 453–470.Google Scholar
Avidov, Z., Applebaum, S. W. and Berlinger, M. J. (1965) Physiological aspects of host specificity in the Bruchidae II—Ovipositional preference and behaviour of Cal-losobruchus chinensis L. Ent. Exp. Appl. 8, 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chessel, D. (1978) La description non-paramétrique de la dispersion spatiale des individus d'un espèce. In Biometrie et Ecologie (Edited by Legay, J. M. and Massone, Pr.), pp. 45–135.Google Scholar
Jarry, M. et Bonet, A. (1981) Premieres observations sur la contamination par Zabrotes subfasciatus Boh. (Cole-optera, Bruchidae) de gousses de Phaseolus vulgaris L. et P. lunalus L. au Mexique. Oecol. Applic. 24, 311–315.Google Scholar
Jarry, M., Debouzie, D. and Chacon, A. (1986) Influence de quelques variables liées à la plante Phaseolus vulgaris sur la ponte d'Acanthoscelides obtectus dans la nature. Ent. exp. appl. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimbert, M. P. (1983) Etude préliminaire en laboratoire et dans la nature (à Costa Rica) de l'activité reproductrice de Zabrotes subfasciatus Boh. (Coléoptère, Bruchidae) en presence de deux plantes hôtes (Phaseolus vulgaris cultivé et Phaseolus lunatus sauvage). Thèse de Doctoral, Tours, 2 tomes.Google Scholar
Pimbert, M. P. and Pierre, D. (1983) Ecophysiological aspects of bruchid reproduction I. The influence of pod maturity and seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris and the influence of insemination on the reproductive activity of Zabrotes subfasciatus. Ecol. Ent. 8, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1981) Epideictic pheromones that influence spacing patterns of phytophagous insects. In Semio-Chemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. (Edited by Nordlund, D. A.), pp. 181–213, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Umeya, K. (1966) Studies on the comparative ecology of bean weevils. I. On the egg distribution and the oviposition behaviours of three species of bean weevils infesting azuki beans. Res. Bull. P.I. Prot. Japan 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
Utida, S. (1967) Collective oviposition and larval aggregation in Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boh.) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Emden, H. F. (1980) Insects and mites of legume crops. In Advances in Legume Science (Edited by Summerfield, R. J. and Bunting, A. H.), pp. 187–197.Google Scholar