Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:51:33.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative susceptibility of 20 elite maize varieties to infestation and damage by the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2015

L.C. Nwosu ,
C.O. Adedire ,
E.O. Ogunwolu  and
M.O. Ashamo
L.C. Nwosu*
Affiliation:
Food Storage Technology Programme, Department of Biology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
C.O. Adedire
Affiliation:
Food Storage Technology Programme, Department of Biology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
E.O. Ogunwolu
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria
M.O. Ashamo
Affiliation:
Food Storage Technology Programme, Department of Biology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
*
*E-mail: luke2007ambition@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Susceptibility studies keep farmers informed, and enhance breeding programmes' testing against infestation and damage by stored product pests. Therefore, the susceptibility of 20 elite maize varieties to Sitophilus zeamais infestation was investigated in the laboratory at 32.7 °C ambient temperature and 70.4% relative humidity. The varieties tested were obtained from the Maize Breeding Units of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), and Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR&T), both in Ibadan, Nigeria. Susceptibility was assessed, using as indices, weevil mortality and survival rates, percentage grain damage, percentage grain weight loss, weight of grain powder, weevil development time, and number of emerged adults. The susceptibility index was determined post-infestation at 56 days using Dobie's formula and at 90 days from a new formula derived from Dobie's formula. Susceptible varieties produced significantly (P≤ 0.05) high numbers of F1 and F2 progeny, and had significantly (P≤ 0.05) low weevil mortality and early first weevil emergence. Grain damage and loss increased with storage duration. There was no visible damage to varieties 2000SYNEE-WSTR and TZBRELD3C5 at 56 days post-infestation. At 90 days, the two varieties had the lowest percentage grain damage, percentage weight loss, and weight of grain powder. The index of susceptibility at F2 progeny showed that the resistant varieties decreased in number from 17 (85%) to 13 (65%) and the moderately resistant varieties increased from 2 (10%) to 6 (30%). This suggests the effect of prolonged storage duration on the inherent ability of varieties to resist weevil attack. Variety PVASYN3F2 was susceptible. The factors conferring high resistance to 2000SYNEE-WSTR and TZBRELD3C5 should be investigated. They should be promoted to control S. zeamais infestation and damage in stored maize.

Keywords

maizeprogenysusceptibility indexstorageresistancecontrol
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abebe, F., Tefera, T., Mugo, S., Beyene, Y. and Vidal, S. (2009) Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 5937–5943.Google Scholar
Abraham, T. (1991) The biology, significance and control of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored maize. MSc thesis, School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University of Agriculture, Ethiopia. 250 pp.Google Scholar
Adedire, C. O. (2001) Biology, ecology and control of insect pests of stored cereal grains, pp. 59–94. In Pests of Stored Cereal and Pulses in Nigeria: Biology, Ecology and Control (edited by Ofuya, T. I. and Lale, N. E. S.). Dave Collins Publications, Akure, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Adedire, C. O., Akinkurolere, R. O. and Ajayi, O. O. (2011) Susceptibility of some maize cultivars in Nigeria to infestation and damage by maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Nigerian Journal of Entomology 28, 55–63.Google Scholar
Asawalam, E. F., Emosairue, S. O., Ekeleme, F. and Wokocha, R. C. (2007) Insecticidal effects of powdered parts of eight Nigerian plant species against maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 6, 2526–2533.Google Scholar
Ashamo, M. O. and Khanna, S. C. (2006) Resistance to the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in some paddy varieties. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 14, 368–373.Google Scholar
Demissie, G., Tefera, T. and Tadesse, A. (2008) Importance of husk covering on field infestation of maize by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at Bako, Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 3774–3779.Google Scholar
Dobie, P. (1974) The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 10, 183–197.Google Scholar
Giga, D. P., Mutemerewa, S., Moyo, G. and Neeley, D. (1991) Assessment and control of losses caused by insect pests in small farmers' stores in Zimbabwe. Crop Protection 10, 287–292.Google Scholar
Horber, E. (1988) Methods to detect and evaluate resistance in maize to seed insects in the field and in storage, pp. 140–150. In Towards Insect Resistant Maize for the Third World. Proceedings of an International Symposium on Methodologies for Developing Host Plant Resistance to Maize Insects. CIMMYT, EI Batan, Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
Kiritani, K. (1965) Biological studies on the Sitophilus complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Japan. Journal of Stored Products Research 1, 169–176.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. (1984) Insect Pest Control, With Special Reference to African Agriculture. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, London. 298 pp.Google Scholar
Markham, R. H., Bosque-Pérez, N., Borgemeister, C. and Meikle, W. G. (1994) Developing pest management strategies for the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, and the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus, in the humid and sub-humid tropics. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin 42, 97–116.Google Scholar
Mattah, I. K. F. (2001) A review of stored insect pests of maize in the tropics. BSc Dissertation, Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Mwololo, J. K., Mugo, S. N., Okori, P., Tefera, T., Otim, M. and Munyiri, S. W. (2012) Sources of resistance to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais in tropical maize. Journal of Agricultural Science, Canada 4, 206–215. doi:10.5539/jas.v4n11p206 .Google Scholar
Nwosu, L. C. and Nwosu, U. I. (2012) Assessment of maize cob powder for the control of weevils in stored maize grain in Nigeria. Journal of Entomological Research 36, 195–199.Google Scholar
Nwosu, L. C., Adedire, C. O. and Ogunwolu, E. O. (2015) Screening for new sources of resistance to Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infestation in stored maize genotypes. Journal of Crop Protection 4, 277–290.Google Scholar
Osipitan, A. A., Adebowale, T. J., Mohammed, I. G. and Adekanmbi, D. I. (2012) Evaluation of the effect of interspecific competition by larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on damage to maize grains. Munis Entomology and Zoology 7, 481–488.Google Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. The MacMillan Co., New York. 520 pp.Google Scholar
Tefera, T., Mugo, S. and Likhayo, P. (2011) Effects of insect population density and storage time on grain damage and weight loss in maize due to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 2249–2254. doi:10.5897/AJAR11.179 .Google Scholar