Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:40:36.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistance of Cry1Ab maize to spotted stemborer Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Nirmal S. Hari*
Affiliation:
Maize Section, Maize Entomology Laboratory, Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Jawala Jindal
Affiliation:
Maize Section, Maize Entomology Laboratory, Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Nachhattar S. Malhi
Affiliation:
Maize Section, Maize Entomology Laboratory, Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
Get access

Abstract

Three transgenic maize hybrids, viz. Prabal YG, Hishell YG and Double YG, producing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1Ab protein (event Mon 810), were evaluated under field and laboratory conditions for their resistance to spotted stemborer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). The Bt maize hybrids suffered less damage than their non-Bt iso-hybrids with respect to per cent plant infestation (0.0–0.6), leaf injury rating (1.0–1.1) and per cent stem tunnelling. These hybrids also resulted in significantly higher larval mortality (79.4–100.0%) in laboratory bioassays. The toxin protein produced in leaves was equally effective against neonates and 15-day-old larvae. Neonate larvae consumed less leaf area (5.0–13.8%) in case of Bt hybrids than their non-Bt iso-hybrids.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andow, D. A. (2003) Negative and positive data, statistical power, and confidence intervals. Environmental Biosafety Research 2, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, T. L., Patrick, C., Schuster, G., Cronholm, G., Bynum, E. D. and Morrison, W. P. (2001) Ear and shank damage by corn borers and corn earworms to four events of Bacillus thuringiensis transgenic maize. Crop Protection 20, 139144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, A., Romeis, J. and Bigler, F. (2005) Effects of Bt maize expressing Cry1Ab and Bt spray on Spodoptera littoralis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 114, 161169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000) Biopesticides registration action document. Bacillus thuringiensis Plant Incorporated Protectants II. Science Assessment Product Characterization. Available from:http://www.epa.gov/scipolysap/2000/october/brad2_scienceassessment.pdf.Google Scholar
Girijashankar, V., Sharma, H. C., Sharma, K. K., Swathisree, V., Prasad, L. S., Bhat, B. V., Royer, M., Secundo, B. S., Narasu, M. L., Altosaar, I. and Seetharama, N. (2005) Development of transgenic sorghum for insect resistance against the spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus). Plant Cell Reports 24, 513522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn.Wiley-Interscience, New York. 653 pp.Google Scholar
He, K., Wang, Z., Wen, L. and Zhou, D. (2002) Resistance of Bt maize to the Asian corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in China, pp. 1925. In Proceedings of the 8th Asian Regional Maize Workshop: New Technologies for the New Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand, 5–8 August (Edited by Srinivasan, G., Zaidi, P. H., Prasanna, B. M., Gonzalez, F. and Lesnick, K.). Jointly organized by Kasetsart University, Thailand, the Department of Agriculture, Thailand and CIMMYT. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
Hofte, H. and Whiteley, H. R. (1989) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiological Reviews 53, 242255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanta, U. and Sajjan, S. S. (1992) Sugars as feeding stimulants in artificial diet for the mass rearing of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Journal of Insect Science 5, 126129.Google Scholar
Keller, M., Baruch, S., Strizhov, N., Prudovsky, E., Regev, A., Koncz, C., Schekk, J. and Zilberstein, A. (1996) Digestion of δ-endotoxin by gut proteases may explain reduced sensitivity of advanced instar of Spodoptera littoralis to Cry 1C. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 26, 365373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, H. (1997) Resistance in maize to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): An overview. Crop Protection 16, 243250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugo, S., Groote, H. D., Bergvinson, D., Mulaa, M., Songa, J. and Gichuki, S. (2005) Developing Bt maize for resource poor farmers—recent advances in the IRMA project. African Journal of Biotechnology 4, 14901504.Google Scholar
Mugo, S., Taracha, C., Bergvinson, D., Odhiambo, B., Songa, J., Hoisington, D., McLean, S., Ngatia, I. and Gethi, M. (2004) Screening cry proteins produced by Bt maize leaves for activity against Kenyan maize stem borers, pp. 102105. In Proceedings of the 7th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference: Integrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millennium, Nairobi, Kenya, 11–15 February 2002 (Edited by Friesen, D. K. and Palmer, A. F. E.). CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
Panwar, V. P. S. (2005) Management of maize stalk borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize, pp. 376395. In Stresses on Maize in the Tropics (Edited by Zaidi, P. H. and Singh, N. N.). Directorate of Maize Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. (1990) Genetics of sorghum, maize, rice and sugarcane resistance to the cereal stem borer, Chilo spp. Insect Science and Its Application 11, 689699.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. and Othieno, S. M. (1990) Inheritance of resistance to the spotted stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. Maydica 35, 247252.Google Scholar
Prutz, G. and Dettner, K. (2005) Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis–maize on larval food consumption, utilization and growth in the grass moth species Chilo partellus under laboratory conditions (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Entomologia Generalis 28, 161172.Google Scholar
The Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) (1998) Regulatory mechanisms for GMOs and products thereof. Available from: http://www.dbtindia.nic.in.Google Scholar
Sanders, P. R., Lee, T. C., Groth, M. E., Aswood, J. D. and Fuchs, R. L. (1998) Safety assessment of insect protected corn, pp. 241256. In Biotechnology and Safety Assessment (Edited by Thomas, J. A.), 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, Routledge.Google Scholar
Sekhon, S. S., Dhillon, B. S. and Kanta, U. (1993) Host plant resistance in maize to insect pests, pp. 79109. In Advances in Host Plant Resistance to Insects (Edited by Dhaliwal, G. S. and Dilawari, V. K.). Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, K. H., Sarup, P., Panwar, V. P. S. and Marwaha, K. K. (1977) Evolution of base ingredients to formulate artificial diet for the mass rearing of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Journal of Entomological Research 1, 117131.Google Scholar
Singh, R., Channappa, R. K., Deeba, F., Nagaraj, N. J., Sukavaneaswaran, M. K. and Manjunath, T. M. (2005) Tolerance of Bt corn (Mon 810) to maize stem borer Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Plant Cell Reports 24, 556560.Google Scholar