Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:23:04.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semi-captive rearing of the African wild silkmoth Gonometa postica (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) on an indigenous and a non-indigenous host plant in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Boniface M. Ngoka*
Affiliation:
ICIPE—African Insect Science for Food and Health, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Esther N. Kioko
Affiliation:
ICIPE—African Insect Science for Food and Health, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Suresh K. Raina
Affiliation:
ICIPE—African Insect Science for Food and Health, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Jones M. Mueke
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Kenyatta University, PO Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
David M. Kimbu
Affiliation:
ICIPE—African Insect Science for Food and Health, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
*
Get access

Abstract

The life cycle of the African wild silkmoth Gonometa postica Walker was studied between September 2000 and September 2001 in the Uasin Gishu District of western Kenya with Acacia mearnsii de Wild and Acacia hockii de Wild as host plants. The initial population of G. postica was set up from healthy live pupae in cocoons collected from host plants in the study area. Oviposition was carried out in net sleeves and small plastic cages. Moth emergence and oviposition were bimodal, occurring between September and October 2000 and between March and April 2001, respectively. Larvae were reared in semi-captivity by using net sleeves on the branches of the two host plants. Larvae passed through six developmental instars. The pupal stage lasted from December to February during the short rains and from June to September during the long rains. Moth fecundity in the net sleeves was higher than that of those kept in plastic cages and fewer eggs hatched in the plastic cages compared with the net sleeves. Larvae reared on A. mearnsii had a shorter developmental period compared with those reared on A. hockii. Male larvae spun cocoons earlier than females but moths of both sexes emerged simultaneously. Sexual dimorphism was exhibited in both pupal and adult stages, females being larger and heavier than males. The importance of the semi-captive rearing technique for sustainable utilization of wild silkmoths for mass production of cocoons is discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashiru, M. O. (1988) Determination of the number of instars of the silk worm Anaphe venata Butler (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). Insect Science and Its Application 9, 405410.Google Scholar
Chikwenhere, G. P. (1992) Distribution and abundance of the African silkmoth (Gonometa rufobrunnea) in Matebeleland Province of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 133137.Google Scholar
Fox, R. C., Anderson, S. C., Garner, S. C. and Walker, A. L. (1972) Larval head capsules of the Nantucket pine moth. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 65, 513514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartland-Rowe, R. (1992) The biology of the wild silkmoth Gonometa rufobrunnea Aurivillus (Lasiocampidae) in north eastern Botswana, with some comments on its potential as a source of wild silk. Botswana Notes and Records 24, 123133.Google Scholar
Kioko, E. N. (1998) Biodiversity of the wild silkmoths (Lepidoptera) and their potential for silk production in East Africa. PhD thesis, Kenyatta University, Nairobi..Google Scholar
Kioko, E. N., Raina, S. K. and Mueke, J. M. (1999) Conservation of the African wild silkmoths for economic incentives to rural communities of the Kakamega forest in Kenya. International Journal of Wild Silkmoths and Silk 4, 15.Google Scholar
Kioko, E. N., Raina, S. K. and Mueke, J. M. (2000) Survey on diversity of wild silkmoth species in East Africa. East Africa Journal of Science 2, 16.Google Scholar
Kioko, E. N., Raina, S. K., Fening, K. O., Ngoka, B. M. and Mbahin, N. (2007) Harnessing wild silkmoth biodiversity for environmental conservation and income generation, pp. 151154. In Development of Sericulture and Apiculture Products for the Poor in Fragile Ecosystems Using the Value Chain Approach (Edited by Raina, S. K., Muli, E. M., Nguku, E. K. and Kioko, E.). Proceedings of the Trainers' Course and IVth International Workshop on the Conservation and Utilization of Commercial Insects, 14 November to 8 December 2006. ISBN 9290641916. ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Klomp, H. (1966) The dynamics of the pine looper, Bupalus pinarius L. Advances in Ecological Research 3, 207307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, B. K., Dash, A. K., Mishra, C. S. K., Nayak, U. K., Dash, M. C. and Prabhakar, D. R. (1994) Innovation of technology for commercial rearing of Indian wild tasar silk insect, godamodal ecorace of Antheraea paphia Linn. (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). International Journal of Wild Silkmoths and Silk 1, 7579.Google Scholar
Okelo, O. (1972) Life history studies of Gonometa podocarpi Aurivillius (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) in East Africa. Ohio Journal of Science 72, 301303.Google Scholar
Raina, S. K. (2000) The Economics of Apiculture and Sericulture Modules for Income Generation in Africa. IBRA Press, Cardiff. 57 pp.Google Scholar
Raina, S. K. (2004) Commercial Insects: A Practical Guide for Raising and Utilising Silkmoths and Honey Bees in Africa. Volumes 1–3. Three books published in 7 languages (English, French, Kiswahili, Spanish, Luganda, Arabic and Amharic). Raina S.K. (Compiler); Overholt K. (Ed., English); Jones H.R. (Overall Ed., International Bee Research Association, UK). (173 pp.). ISBN 0860982467 English, French, Swahili; (183 pp.) ISBN 086098241 English, Spanish, Lugandan; (192 pp.) ISBN 0860982475 English, Arabic, Amharic. ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. H., Campbell, R. K. and Trotter, S. J. Jr (1977) Errors in determining instar number through head capsule measurements of a Lepidoptera – a laboratory study and critique. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 24, 451466.Google Scholar
Sinha, A. K. and Chaudhuri, A. (1992) Factors influencing the phenology of different broods of tropical tasar silk moth, Antheraea mylitta Drury (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in relation to its emergence and post-emergence. Environment and Ecology 10, 952958.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1968) Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Methuen, London. 391 pp.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2000) SAS Users Guide. Version 6.Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Veldtman, R. (2004) The ecology of southern African wild silkmoths (Gonometa species, Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): consequences for their sustainable use. PhD dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Veldtman, R., McGeoch, M. A. and Scholtz, C. H. (2002) Variability in pupal size in southern African wild silkmoths: implications for sustainable harvesting. African Entomology 10, 127136.Google Scholar
Veldtman, R., McGeoch, M. A. and Scholtz, C. H. (2004) Parasitoids of southern Africa: wild silkmoths (Lepidoptera). African Entomology 12, 117122.Google Scholar
Veldtman, R., McGeoch, M. A. and Scholtz, C. H. (2007) Fine-scale abundance and distribution of wild silkmoth pupae. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 1527.Google Scholar