Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:10:40.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Susceptibility of some maize varieties to Sitophilus Zeamais mots (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

D. A. Enobakhare  and
E. I. Obasuyi
D. A. Enobakhare
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Benin, P. M. B. 1154, Benin City, Nigeria
E. I. Obasuyi
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Benin, P. M. B. 1154, Benin City, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

Four maize varieties, 8321–21-W, DMR-LSR-W, ACR-83TZUT-W and TZB were simultaneously fed to Sitophilus zeamais in a completely randomized design. Susceptibility was assessed on such parameters as weight loss of grains caused by the weevil infestation, number of progenies at 42 days after infestation and the percentage of damaged kernels. The least susceptible in terms of loss of weight of grains was TZB. Losses in the other three were not significantly different at 5% level (P ≻ 0.05).

The least percentage mortality of adult weevils and the highest number of punctured kernels were observed in var. 8321–21-W (48%), 27 kernels respectively while var. DMR-LSR-W had the highest mortality score (80%) and ranked second in the total number of kernels punctured (13). Details of the description of maize varieties used and the analysis of damage caused by the weevil are discussed in the paper.

Résumé

Sitophilus zeamais était alimenté simultanément de quatre variétés de maïs (8321–21-W, DMR-LSR-W, ACR-83TZUT-W et TZB) d'une façon complètement choisie au hasard. Tels paramètres que la perte de poids des grains causée par l'invasion des charançons, le nombre de progénitures à 42 jours après l'invasion et la pourcentage des grains endommagés étaient employes pour 1'evaluation de la susceptibilité. Le moindre susceptible en ce qui concerne la perte de poids des grains était le TZB. Les pertes dans d'autres trois variétés n'étaient pas différentes d'une manière significative au niveau de 5% (P > 0.05). Le moindre pourcentage de mortalité des charançons adultes et le nombre le plus élevé des grains crevés étaient observes dans la variété 8321–21-W (48%, 27 respectivement), pendant que la variété DMR-LSR-W avail les points les plus élevés de mortalité (80%), et avait le second rang au nombre total des grains crevés (13). Les details de description des variétés de mais utilisées et l'analyse et le dégat cause par les charancons sont discutés dans cette communication.

Keywords

SusceptibilitySitophilus zeamaismaizeteneralSusceptibilitéSitophilus zeamaismaisjeune charançon
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 179 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, J. M. (1976) Weight loss caused by development of S. zeamais Motsch. in maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 12, 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adesuyi, S. A. (1979) Relative resistance of some varieties of maize to attack by Sitophilus (Mots.). Ann. Rep. Niger. Stored Prod. Res. Inst., 1976/77, Tech. Rep. No. 8, pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
Adesuyi, S. A. (1977) Assessment of losses in two varieties of maize (PARZ 26 and NSI) stored in cribs in the humid tropics. Niger. J. Plant Prot. 3, 98–101.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1975) Production Yearbook, F.A.O. Publication, Rome.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1980) Nigeria rural economic survey. Report on Crop Estimates 1978–1979. Agriculture Survey Unit Federation Office of Statistics, Lagos, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Bernardo, E. N. (1972) Varietal resistance of corn to the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.) The Philippine Entomol. 2, 195–203.Google Scholar
Burges, H. D. and Haskins, K. P. F. (1965) Life cycle of the tropical warehousemoth, Cadra cautella (Wlk.) at controlled temperature and humidities. Bull, entomol. Res. 55, 775–789.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. W. (1972) The interpretation of experiments assessing the susceptibility of stored cereals to attack by Sitophilus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 8, 81–82.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. W. and Porter, J. E. (1986) Some factors affecting the infestation of wheat and maize by Sitophilus oryzae (L) and Sitophilus zeamais Mots. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 22, 33–41.Google Scholar
Comes, M. A. (1965) A revised listing of the insects associated with stored products in Nigeria. Ann. Rep. Niger. Stored Prod. Res., Inst. 1964, Tech. Rep. No. 19, p. 96.Google Scholar
Comes, M. A. (1973) A checklist of the insects associated with stored products in Nigeria (Revised ed.) Ann. Rep. Niger. Stored Prod. Res. Inst. 1971, Tech. Rep. No. 11, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Davey, P. M. (1965) The susceptibility of sorghum to attack by the weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Bull. Entomol. Res. 56, 287–297.Google Scholar
Dennis, S. H. (1975) Agricultural Insect Pests of the Tropics and Their Control. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.Google Scholar
Dobie, P. (1974) The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to post harvest infestation by Sitopilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored. Prod. Res. 10, 183–197.Google Scholar
Falomo, A. A. (1981) Post harvest susceptibility of maize varieties to infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Ann. Rep. Niger. Stored Prod. Res. Inst., 1978/79 Tech. Rep. 6, 57–63.Google Scholar
Giles, P. H. (1969) Observations in Kenya on flight activity of stored products insects particularly Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. J. Stored Prod. Res. 4, 317–329.Google Scholar
Halstead, G. H. (1962) External sex differences in stored products Coleoptera. Bull. Entomol. Res. 54, 119–134.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1956) The effect of temperature and humidity on the role of development and mortality of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Ann. appl. Biol. 44, 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlock, E. T. (1965) Some observations on the loss in weight caused by Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to wheat under constant experimental conditions. J. Stored. Prod. Res. 1, 193–195.Google Scholar
Ivbijaro, M. F., Osisanya, E. O. and Akinlade, E. E. (1979) The deterioration of commercial maize (Zea mays L.) by insects and fungi. Int. Bio-deterior. Bull. 15, 74–76.Google Scholar
Longstaff, B. C. (1981) Density-dependent fecundity in Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 17, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morah, S. C. (1977) A comparison of two techniques for testing in the laboratory the susceptibility of maize varieties to infestation by Sitophilus zeamais (Mots). Rep. Nig. Stored. Prod. Res. Inst. 1977 Tech. Rep. No. 4, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
Morah, S. C. and Mbata, G. N. (1986) Assessment of the relative susceptibility of some maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Mots). Ann. Rep. Niger. Stored Prod. Res. Inst. 1982, Tech. Rep. No. 5, pp. 63–68.Google Scholar
Riley, J., Effiong, E. A. and Ogunmodede, S. I. (1956) Damage to various maize varieties in store. Ann. Rep. West. Afr. Stored Prod. Res. Unit. 1956, pp. 164–169.Google Scholar
Russel, D. (1966) Influence of rice varieties on oviposition and development of S. oryzae and S. zeamais. J. Stored Prod. Res. 16, 1–28.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, A. V., Mills, R.B. and Horber, E. (1974) Development of Sitophilus zeamais Mots, in maize kernels and pellets made from maize kernels fractions. J. Stored Prod. Res. 10, 73–80.Google Scholar
Singh, D. N. and McCain, F.S. (1963) The relationship of some nutritional properties of the corn kernel to rice weevil infestation. Crop Sci. 3, 259–261.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Agrawal, N. S. and Girish, G. K. (1974) The oviposition and development of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) in different high yielding varieties of maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 10, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tropical Development and Research Institute (TDRI) (1987) Insects and Arachnids of Tropical Stored Products—Their Biology and Identification (A Training Manual). Storage Department, TDRI, London.Google Scholar
Tipping, P. W., Rodriguez, C. G., Poneleit, and Legg, D. E. (1986) Feeding activity of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on resistant and susceptible corn genotypes. Environ. Entomol. 15, 654–658.Google Scholar
Tyagi, A. K. and Girish, G. K. (1977) Studies on the assessment of storage losses of food grains by insects- Factors affecting extent of damage. Bull. Grain. Technol. 15, 46–61.Google Scholar
Windstrom, N. W., Redlinger, L. M. and Wiser, W. J. (1972) Appraisal of methods for measuring corn kernel resistance to Sitophilus zeamais. J. econ. Entomol. 65, 790–792.Google Scholar