Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:04:19.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari to various insecticidal formulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Llewellyn F. Rhodes  and
Ajai Mansingh
Llewellyn F. Rhodes
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Ajai Mansingh
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Get access

Abstract

The LC50 values (% active ingredient in parentheses) for 34 formulations of 29 insecticides, obtained by dipping green berries (GWB) infested with adult Hypothenemus hampei, were: thiodan EC 35 (0.0003) > perfekthion (0.0004) > carbicron (0.00044) > decis (0.0005) > actellic (0.0008) > basudin (0.0009) > belmark and ciodrin (0.0012) > thiodan EC 3 (0.0013) > malathion (0.0014) > folimat and bidrin (0.002) > aldicarb and lindane (0.003) > nexion > tiovel EC 3 > dursban (0.0046–0.006) > supona > methomyl > kelthane (0.011–0.012) > chlordane > aldrin > dimilin > chlorfenvinphos > phosdrin > sevin > methoxychlor > dieldrin (0.016–0.025) > nexagan (0.034) > azodrin (0.04) > fenitrothion (0.07) > bimarit (0.14) > chlorpyrifos (0.39) > gardona (0.96).

The order of toxicity remained the same for borers in the pulp (GP) or endosperm (GE) of green berries or endosperm of red (RE) berries, though the LC50 of each formulation of the same or different insecticides varied significantly. The respective LC50 values for the four leading, and the rest of the formulations were about 7−21- and 2−6-fold higher in GWB than GP, 9−23 and 2−5-fold higher in GE than GP, 1−2.3- and 1−3-fold higher in RE than GE, and 12−25- and 3−37-fold higher in RE than GWB. The practical significance of the results is discussed.

Keywords

Coffee berry borerHypothenemus hampeiinsecticidesformulations
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 227 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almedia, P. R., Cavalcante, R. E. and Holand, A. A. (1966) New results in the control of coffee berry borer, H. hampei (Ferr., 1867). An Reuniao Fitossanitar Brasil. 10, 51–54.Google Scholar
Amaral, S. F., Arruda, H. V. and Orlando, A. (1973) Some insecticides and coffee liquor. Archos Inst. biol., S Paulo. 40, 173–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Amaral, S. F. and Oliviera, D. A. (1974) The behaviour of some chlorinated insecticides for the control of coffee berry borer H. hampei (Ferr., 1867). Secao de Pragas das Plantas Alimenticias Basices e Olericolas, Instituto Biologio, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 40, 106–110.Google Scholar
Bardner, R. (1978) Pest control in coffee. Pestic. Sci. 9, 458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamin, J. (1943) Contribucao para o conhecimento da biologia da broca do cafe. Archos Inst. biol., S Paulo. 14, 31–72.Google Scholar
Boncato, A. A. and Gandia, I. M. (1967) Effect of four spraying frequencies with six insecticides in the control of coffee berry borer Stephanoderes hampei (Ferr.). Phillip. J. Plant Ind. 32, 109–119.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1957) Techniques for Testing Insecticides, pp. 167–184. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1965) The coffee berry borer in Kenya. Kenya Coffee. 134, 15–21.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Paz, P. and Penagos, D. H. (1974) Evaluation of a system of low volume application, in the control of the borer of coffee fruit. Ana cafe. 134, 15–21.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. R. (1968) Observations on the control of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.) with endosulfan in Uganda. Bull. ent. Res. 57, 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepage, H. S. and Giannotti, O. (1950) The action of some modern insecticides on the coffee berry borer. Archos Inst. biol., S Paulo. 19, 299–308.Google Scholar
Lepelley, R. H. (1969) Pests of Coffee, pp. 114–138. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Liceras, Z. L. and Farge, G. G. (1975) Chemical control of the coffee berry borer with early and late applications in Tingo Maria. Revista Peruva de Entomologia. 17, 78–80.Google Scholar
McPherson, G. I. (1978) Report on the presence of coffee berry borer in Jamaica. Symposium on Coffee Cultivation, Curso Reuniones, IICA 184, 15–24. Guatemala City.Google Scholar
Penados-Robles, R. and Ochoa, M. H. (1978) Evaluation of insecticides in the control of the borer of coffee fruit in the Republic of Guatemala. In Symposium on Coffee Cultivation, Curso Reuniones, IICA 184, 25–37. Guatemala City.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. T. (1980) Agricultural Chemicals, Book I, Insecticides. Thomson, Fresno, California.Google Scholar