Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:16:01.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in oviposition in four strains of Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic) from different geographical areas of Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

D.P. Giga ,
I. Kadzere  and
J. Canhão
D.P. Giga
Affiliation:
University of Zimbabwe, Department of Crop Science, P.O. Box MP 167, Harare, Zimbabwe
I. Kadzere
Affiliation:
University of Zimbabwe, Department of Crop Science, P.O. Box MP 167, Harare, Zimbabwe
J. Canhão
Affiliation:
University of Zimbabwe, Department of Crop Science, P.O. Box MP 167, Harare, Zimbabwe
Get access

Abstract

The fecundity and duration of oviposition in three strains of Callosobruchus rhodesianus from the highveld, middleveld and lowveld regions of Zimbabwe and a laboratory strain were recorded on cowpea and greengram. Within-legume variability for both parameters was high among the four strains. The lowveld strain was the least fecund and had the longest duration of oviposition. The middleveld strain showed the highest fecundity on cowpea, but did not differ significantly from the other three strains on greengram.

Résumé

La fécondité et la durée de la ponte chez trois biotypes de Callosobruchus rhodesianus des régions du haut veld, du moyen veld et du bas veld du Zimbabwe ont été rapportées sur le niébé et le haricot doré (golden gram/greengram/mung bean: Vigna radiata/Phaseolus aureus). La variabilité intra-légume des deux paramètres était élevée parmi les quatre biotypes. La biotype du bas veld était le moins fécond et sa ponte durait le plus longtemps. La biotype du moyen veld présenta la plus haute fécondité sur le niébé mais qui n'était pas significativement différente de la ponte des trois autres biotypes sur le haricot doré.

Keywords

Callosobruchus rhodesianusgeographical strainsovipositionoviposition periodZimbabweCallosobruchus rhodesianusbiotypes géographiquespontepériode de ponteZimbabwe
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3-4 , December 1995 , pp. 311 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Credland, P. F. (1986) Effect of host availability on reproductive performance in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Brachidae). J. stored Prod. Res. 22, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P. F. (1987) Effects of host change on the fecundity and development of an unusual strain of Callosbruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Brachidae). J. stored Prod. Res. 23, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P. F. (1990) Biotype variation and host change in bruchids: Causes and effects in the evolution of brachid pests, pp. 271–287. In Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution (Edited by Fujii, K., Gatehouse, A. M. R., Johnson, C. G., Mitchell, R. and Yoshida, T.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P. F. and Dendy, J. (1990) Bruchids and legume seeds: Adaptations and adaptability, pp. 29–37. In Proc. 5th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection (Edited by Fleurat-Lessard, F. and Ducom, P.). Imprimerie du Medoc, France.Google Scholar
Credland, P. F. and Dick, K. M. (1987) Food consumption by larvae of strains of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Brachidae). J. stored Prod. Res. 23, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P. F., Dick, K. M. and Wright, A. W. (1986) Relationships between larval density, adult size and egg production in the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 11, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P. F. and Wright, A. W. (1989) Factors affecting female fecundity in the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Brachidae). J. stored Prod. Res. 25, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decelle, J. (1981) Brachidae related to legumes in the afro-tropical area. Series Entomologica 19, 193–197.Google Scholar
Dick, K. M. and Credland, P. F. (1984) Eggproduction and development of three strains of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Brachidae). J. stored Prod. Res. 20, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, K. M. and Credland, P. F. (1986a) Changes in the responses of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleopetera: Brachidae) to a resistant variety of cowpea. J. stored Prod. Res. 22, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, K. M. and Credland, P. F. (1986b) Variation in the response of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) to a resistant variety of cowpea. J. stored Prod. Res. 22, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, K. (1968) Studies on interspecific competition between azuki bean weevil and the Southern cowpea weevil. III. Some characteristics of strains of two species. Res. Popul. Ecol. 10, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giga, D. P., Kadzere, I. and Canhao, J. (1993) Bionomics of four strains of Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) (Coleoptera: Brachidae) infesting different food legumes. J. stored Prod. Res. 29, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giga, D. P. and Smith, R. H. (1983) Comparative life history studies of four Callosobruchus species infesting cowpeas with special reference to Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) (Coleoptera: Brachidae). J. stored Prod. Res. 19, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giga, D. P. and Smith, R. H. (1987) Egg production and development of Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Brachidae) on several commodities at two different temperatures. J. stored Prod. Res. 23, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. and Currie, J. E. (1964) Some laboratory observations on the rates of development, mortality and oviposition of several species of Brachidae breeding in stored pulses. Bull. Entomol. Res. 55, 437–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F. J. and Renwick, J. A. (1985) Ability of ovipositing seed beetles to discriminate between seeds with differing egg loads. Ecological Entomology 10, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1990) Behavioural ecology of Callosobruchus maculatus, pp. 317–330. In Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution (Edited by Fujii, K., Gatehouse, A. M. R., Johnson, C. G., Mitchell, R. and Yoshida, T.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwanze, K. and Horber, E. (1976) Seed coats of cowpeas affect oviposition and larval development of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) Environ. Entomol. 5, 213–218.Google Scholar
Nwanze, K., Horber, E. and Pitts, C. (1975) Evidence of ovipositional preference of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) for cowpea varieties. Environ. Entomol. 4, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. and Lessells, C. M. (1984) Oviposition, ovicide and larval competition in granivorous insects, pp. 432–448. In Behavioural Ecology: Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour, Symposium British Ecological Society (Edited by Sibly, R. M. and Smith, R. H.). Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. (1951) Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid or other solutions. Bull. Entomol. Res. 42, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1958) Systematic notes on species of Callosobruchus of economic importance. Bull. Entomol. Res. 49, 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1964) Distribution and hosts of certain Brachidae in Africa. Trop. Stored Prod. Inf. 7, 277–279.Google Scholar