Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:41:42.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in susceptibility of some Vigna taxa to infestation by Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

D. P. Giga  and
G. Moyo
D. P. Giga
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP. 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
G. Moyo
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP. 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Get access

Abstract

Sixteen taxa in the genus Vigna were compared for susceptibility to attack by Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) under laboratory conditions. Ovipositional response, adult emergence and their development periods differed significantly between the species. Although oviposition took place on all the Vigna taxa at varying levels, the bruchid was unable to develop successfully on four of the 16 taxa Investigated. V. vexillata var. angustifolia, V. vexillata var. vexillata, V. oblongifolia and V. luteola were resistant to attack.

Résumé

La susceptibilité de seize espèces de haricot du genre Vigna a l'infestation par le charançon Callosobruchus rhodesianus a été étudlée au laboratoire. L'ovipositlon, l'eclosion des oeufs ainsi que la durée totale du développement ont varié en fonction de l'espèce de haricot. Bien que l'ovipositlon a été enregistrée pour toutes les espèces, quatre ont cependant empê;ché tout développement ultérieur. Les espèces V. vexillata var. angustifolia, V. vexillata var. vexillata, V. oblongifolia and V. luteola se sont montrées résistantes a 1'attaque de ce charançon.

Keywords

Callosobruchus rhodesianusVigna taxasusceptibilityCallosobruchus rhodesianusVigna espècessusceptibilité
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 217 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appelbaum, S. W. and Birk, Y. (1972) Natural mechanism of resistance to insects in legume seeds. In Insect and Mite Nutrition (Edited by Rodriguez, J. G.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dobie, P., Greve, J., Hothi, K. and Kilminster, A. M. (1979) Inability of storage bruchidae to infest winged beans (Psophocarpus tetragono-lobus). Entomol. exp. appl. 26, 168–174.Google Scholar
Dobie, P. (1980) The use of resistant varieties of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) to reduce losses due to postharvest attack by Callosobruchus maculatus. In The Ecology of Bruchids Attacking Legumes (Edited by Labeyrie, V.). The Hague.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, A. M., Gatehouse, J. A., Dobie, P., Kilminster, A. and Boutler, D. (1979) Biochemical basis of insect resistance in Vigna unguiculata. J. Sci. Food Agric. 30, 948–958.Google Scholar
Giga, D. P. and Smith, R. H. (1981) Varietal resistance and intraspecific competition in the cowpea weevils Callosobruchus maculatus and C. chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. appl. Ecol. 18, 755–761.Google Scholar
Giga, D. P. and Smith, R. H. (1986) Egg production and development of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on several commodities at two different temperatures. J. Stored Prod. Res. 23, 9–15.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H., Juster, H. B. and Liener, I. E. (1976) Insecticidal action of phytohemaglutinin in black beans. Science 192, 795–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1977) How Southern cowpea weevil larvae (Bruchidae: Callosobruchus maculatus) die on nonhost seeds. Ecology 58, 921–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labeyrie, V. (1981) Ecological problems arising from weevil infestation of food legumes. In The Ecology of Bruchids Attacking Legumes (Pulses) (Edited by Labeyrie, V.), pp. 1–15. Proceedings of International Symposium held at Tours (France) 1980. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
Nwanze, K. and Horber, E. (1976) Seed coats of cowpeas affect oviposition and larval development of Callosobruchus maculatus (R). Environ. Entomol. 5, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofuya, T. I. (1987) Susceptibility of some Vigna species to infestation and damage by Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 3, 137–138.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, A. and Cardona, C. (1982) Low levels of resistance to the Mexican Bean Weevil in dry beans. J. econ. Entomol. 75, 567–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonhoven, A., Cardona, C. and Valor, J. (1983) Resistance to the bean weevil and Mexican bean weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in noncultivated common bean accessions. J. econ. Entomol. 76, 1255–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1964) Distribution and hosts of certain Bruchidae in Africa. Trop. Stored Prod. Inf. 7, 277–279.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1979) The importance of the bruchidae as pests of grain legumes, their distribution and control. In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control (Edited by Singh, S. R., van Emden, H. F. and Taylor, T. A.) London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1971) Insect pests of tropical grain legumes. Seminar on Plant Protection of Tropical Food Crops. Ford Foundation/IRAT/IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 1971.Google Scholar
Thiery, D. (1984) Hardness of Fabaceous seed coats in relation to larval penetration by Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 20, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar