Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:31:54.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply: Citizenship Is Context-Specific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Chiara Saraceno
Chiara Saraceno
Affiliation:
University of Turin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Scholarly Controversy: Women, Work and Citizenship
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 52 , Fall 1997 , pp. 27 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Lister, Ruth, “Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis,” paper presented at the Women and Citizenship Conference,University of Greenwich,July 16–18, 1996.Google Scholar

2. See Martin, Claude, “Protection Sociale et Protection par la Famille en Europe du SudQuelles Specificités?,” paper presented at “Comparing Southern Welfare States,” a conference organized by Mission Recherche Experimentation(MIRE) at The European University, Florence, February, 1996.Google Scholar

3. See Zincone, Giovanna, Da sudditi a cittadini (Bologna, 1990).Google Scholar

4. The controversial question of whether it is possible to determine “objective” women's interests has been extensively debated; see, for example, the essays collected in The Political Interests of Gender, ed. Jones, Kathleen and Jonasdottir, Ana (London, 1988).Google Scholar

5. As Ira Katznelson points out, this issue is at the core of Theda Skocpol's Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar See his comments in “Conference Panel: On Theda Skocpol's Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States,” Studies in American Political Development 8 (1994): 132–39, particularly 135. I am surprised that Tilly makes nomention of Skocpol's study in her essay.Google Scholar

6. Skocpol, , “Protecting Soldiers and Mothers.”Google Scholar

7. Fraser, Nancy, “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a Post Socialist Age,” New Left Review 212 (1995): 69.Google Scholar

8. Pedersen, Susan, Family Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar

9. Knijn, Trudie, “Fish without Bikes: Revision of the Dutch Welfare State and its Consequences for the (In)dependence of Single Mothers,” Social Politics 1 (1994):83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Saraceno, Chiara, “The Ambivalent Familism of the Italian Welfare State,” Social Politics 1 (1994):60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar