Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:11:26.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to J. Rancière “The Myth of the Artisan”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Nicholas Papayanis
Nicholas Papayanis
Affiliation:
Department of History Brooklyn College of the CityUniversity of New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 25 , Spring 1984 , pp. 39 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1984

References

NOTES

1. Merrheim, , Le Cuivre, No. 97, September 1902, p. 2Google Scholar.

2. I develop this point at length in my forthcoming book, currently in manuscript form, on the life of Merrheim. An excellent discussion of the Longwy strikes is Bonnet, Serge and Humbert, Roger., La ligne rouge des hautes fourneaux (Paris. 1981); see especially pp. 198–213Google Scholar.

3. Papayanis, Nicholas, “Alphonse Merrheim and the Strike of Hennebont: The struggle for the eight-hour day in France,” International Review of Social History, vol. XVI (1971). Part 2, pp. 159–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Papayanis, , “Masses révolutionnaires et directions réformistes: les tensions au corps des grèves des métallurgistes français en 1919,” Le Mouvement Social, 10–12 1975, pp. 51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.