Article contents
Iran-United States, Case No. A/18
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
Claims — Nationality of claims — Dual nationals — Claimant possessing nationality of the respondent State — Whether claim against respondent State precluded by claimant’s nationality — Theory of dominant and effective nationality — Hague Convention Concerning Certain Questions regarding the Conflict of Nationality Laws, 1930, Articles 4 and 5 — Iran-United States Claims Tribunal — Whether possessing jurisdiction over claims by persons having nationality of Iran and the United States — Iran-United States Claims Settlement Declaration, 1981, Articles II and VII
International tribunals — Iran-United States Claims Tribunal — Nature and function of Tribunal — Whether inter-State tribunal — Whether claims brought before Tribunal in exercise of right of diplomatic protection — Direct access of individual to the Tribunal — Whether jurisdiction clause should always be construed narrowly
Nationality — Individuals — Dual nationality — Whether exceptional — Effect in international law — Circumstances in which nationality acquired — Dominant and effective nationality — Criteria for determining which nationality is dominant and effective
Treaties — Interpretation — Iran-United States Claims Settlement Declaration, 1981 — Principles of interpretation — Reference to general international law as aid to interpretation — Whether necessary to demonstrate “converging will” of parties to treaty to establish a particular interpretation — Whether jurisdiction clause to be construed narrowly
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Municipal law concepts in international law — Nationality and citizenship — Effect in international law — The law and practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal
Keywords
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 1987
- 1
- Cited by