Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:58:52.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Request by the United Nations General Assembly for an Advisory Opinion)

International Court of Justice.  08 July 1996 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Environment — War — Nuclear weapons — Effect of use of nuclear weapons upon the environment — Treaties for the protection of the environment — Whether applicable to military operations in time of armed conflict — Relationship between international environmental law and the law of armed conflict — Principle 24, Rio Declaration — United Nations Environmental Modification Treaty, 1977 — Additional Protocol I, 1977, Article 35(3)

Human rights — War — Nuclear weapons — Whether human rights treaties applicable to military operations in time of armed conflict — Right to life — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Relationship between the law of human rights and the law of armed conflict

International Court of Justice — Advisory jurisdiction — Request by United Nations General Assembly — Request for advisory opinion concerning whether the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons permitted under international law — Whether within the jurisdiction of the Court — United Nations Charter, Article 96(1) — Discretion of Court not to reply to question — Statute of the Court, Article 65(1) — Whether question poses a legal question — Whether motives for asking the question relevant — Role of the Court in advisory proceedings

International criminal law — Genocide — Genocide Convention, 1948 — Nuclear weapons — Whether use of nuclear weapons would constitute offence of genocide

International organizations — United Nations — General Assembly — Competence — Security issues — Nuclear weapons — Role of the Assembly in view of involvement of the Security Council — Whether Assembly competent to request advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice — Resolutions of the General Assembly — Whether a source of law — Normative significance of resolutions in the light of the practice of States

Reprisals and countermeasures — Reprisals involving the use of force — Whether armed reprisals lawful in time of peace — Belligerent reprisals — Use of nuclear weapons — Threat to use nuclear weapons

Sources of international law — Custom — Requirements of custom — Importance of actual State practice — Persistent objector principle — Opinio juris — United Nations General Assembly resolutions — Normative significance — Resolutions on the use of nuclear weapons

War and armed conflict — Nuclear weapons — Whether use or threat to use nuclear weapons lawful — Applicable law — Relevance of law on the environment and human rights — Law regarding the use of force — Right of self-defence — Relationship between right of self-defence and law regulating the conduct of hostilities — Possible tension between law of armed conflict and right of self-defence — Restrictions on the right of self-defence — Proportionality and necessity — Concept of threat to use force — Principles of the law of armed conflict regarding weaponry and targets — Unnecessary suffering principle — Requirement that civilians and civilian objects should not be attacked — Principle of proportionality — Collateral damage — Prohibition of poison and poisoned weapons — Martens clause — Applicability to the use of nuclear weapons — Neutrality — Obligations of belligerents towards neutral States — Characteristics of nuclear weapons — Whether use of nuclear weapons ever reconcilable with law of armed conflict — Whether use of nuclear weapons lawful in extreme circumstances of self-defence

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)