Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:40:12.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dispute Concerning the Course of the Frontier between BP 62 and Mount Fitzroy (Argentina/Chile.)

International Arbitral Tribunal (Argentina/Chile).  21 October 1994 ; 13 October 1995 ; 13 October 1995 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Successive arbitrations — Status of second arbitration tribunal — Second tribunal's jurisdiction confined to matters within the jurisdiction of the first tribunal — Whether second tribunal possessing independent status — Effect of award of second tribunal — Res judicata

Arbitration — Evidence — Maps — Reliability — Different uses which parties to arbitration made of maps — Other evidence before tribunal — Estoppel — Acquiescence

Arbitration — Procedure — Closing submissions of parties — Whether parties able to modify submissions — Use of expert by tribunal — Whether tribunal delegating power to expert — Finality of award — Party seeking revision of award on grounds of error — Powers of tribunal — Distinction between errors of fact and errors of law

International tribunals — Arbitration tribunal established by two States to determine boundary — Status — Procedure — Evidence

Lakes and landlocked seas — Lakes — Lake as part of international boundary — Water-parting — Use as boundary — Distinction between continental water-parting and local water-parting

Territory — Boundaries — Principles of delimitation — Use of orographical and hydrographical techniques — Maps — Relevance — Importance in showing State practice — Water-parting as boundary — Whether boundary could cross glacier — Effect of movement of glacier — Estoppel — Acquiescence — Administrative acts in disputed territory — Interpretation of earlier arbitration award — Effect of changed knowledge of location of water-parting since original award delivered — Argentine — Chile boundary

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)