Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:01:13.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cutting across doctrines: positive adjustment in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Michèle Schmiegelow
Michèle Schmiegelow
Affiliation:
Project Director at the Institut für Asienkunde, Hamburg, West Germany.
Get access

Abstract

Japan's economy keeps changing too fast, its economic policies are too active and independent, and its domestic structures seemingly deviate too much from Western patterns to conform to theories that rely on general equilibrium in mature economies. Static economics, including recent monetarist, supply-side, and rational expectations models, some aspects of dynamic and development economics, and most of the neoliberal current in international relations theory are seriously challenged. On the other hand, the mercantilist paradigm, theories focusing on the role of the state, and analyses exclusively adopting the subsystemic level of international relations theory have substantial problems with the ample evidence of adaptation to external factors, the dynamism and Schumpeterian qualities of Japanese private enterprises and the far-reaching liberalization of Japan's foreign-exchange and foreign-trade control regime. As the only OECD member to have pursued “anticipatory adjustment” on the macrolevel and as the obvious model for the OECD category of “positive adjustment,” Japan presents a case of universal relevance. It suggests propositions linking targets and instruments of quantitative and qualitative policies, as well as processes of internalization of global factors and externalization of domestic factors. It provides material for revising, extending, and integrating international relations theory and the theory of economic policy.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 1985 , pp. 261 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kahn, Herman, The Emerging Japanese Superstate: Challenge and Response (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970)Google Scholar.

2. Ohkawa, Kazushi and Rosovsky, Henry, Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

3. Uchino, Tatsuro, Japan's Postwar Economy, trans. Harbinson, Mark A. (Tokyo: Kodansha, 1983), pp. 49ffGoogle Scholar.

4. Patrick, Hugh, Monetary Policy and Central Banking in Contemporary Japan (Bombay: Bombay University Press, 1962), pp. 62ff.Google Scholar; Suzuki, Yoshio, Money and Banking in Contemporary Japan: The Theoretical Setting and Its Applications (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980), pp. 76ffGoogle Scholar. Especially for the shift in the use of the postal saving system (the major repository of household savings) as a source of deficit financing before 1949 to an instrument of off-budget fiscal policy thereafter, see Sakakibara, Eisuke and Feldman, Robert, “The Japanese Financial System in Comparative Perspective,” Journal of Comparative Economics 7 (03 1983), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Suzuki, , Money and Banking; Bank of Japan, The Japanese Financial System (Tokyo, 1978), pp. 16ff., 124ffGoogle Scholar.

6. Gerschenkron, Alexander, “Typology of Industrial Development as a Tool of Analysis,” in Second International Conference on Economic History (Paris: Mouton, 1965), pp. 499ffGoogle Scholar.

7. Uchino, , Japan's Postwar Economy, p. 78Google Scholar; Patrick, Monetary Policy.

8. Uchino, , Japan's Postwar Economy, pp. 149ffGoogle Scholar. See also Saxonhouse, Gary, “Cyclical and Macrostructural Issues in US-Japan Economic Relations,” in Okimoto, Daniel, ed., Japan's Economy: Coping with Change in the International Environment (Boulder: Westview, 1982)Google Scholar.

9. Saxonhouse, , “Cyclical and Macrostructural,” p. 135Google Scholar.

10. Schmiegelow, Henrik and Schmiegelow, Michele, “The New Mercantilism in International Relations: The Case of France's External Monetary Policy,” International Organization 29 (Spring 1975), pp. 367–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Katzenstein, Peter J., “International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States,” International Organization 30 (Winter 1976), pp. 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pempel, T. J., “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy: The Domestic Bases for International Behavior,” International Organization 31 (Autumn 1977), pp. 723–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. OECD, Towards an Integrated Social Policy in Japan (Paris, 1977)Google Scholar.

12. Bennet, John W. and Levine, Solomon B., “Industrialization and Social Deprivation: Welfare, Environment and Post-Industrial Society in Japan,” in Patrick, Hugh, ed., Japanese Industrialization and Its Social Consequences (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976), pp. 439–92Google Scholar.

13. Bergsten, C. Fred, “What to Do about US-Japan Economic Conflict?” Foreign Affairs, Summer 1982, pp. 1059–75Google Scholar.

14. Reich, Robert, “Beyond Free Trade,” Foreign Affairs, Spring 1983, pp. 773–804Google Scholar.

15. Singer, J. David, “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations,” in Rosenau, James A. ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York: Free Press, 1969), pp. 20–29Google Scholar.

16. On the “internalization” of international (global) factors and “externalization” of domestic structures, see Katzenstein, “International Relations.”

17. Friedman, Milton, Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953)Google Scholar.

18. Greenwood, John G., “Japan: How to Cope with an Oil Crisis-A Textbook Case,” Asian Monetary Monitor 4 (09–10 1980), pp. 15, 16Google Scholar.

19. Dean, James W., “The Dissolution of the Keynesian Consensus,” in Bell, Daniel and Kristoll, Irving, eds., The Crisis in Economic Theory (New York: Basic Books, 1981), p. 20Google Scholar.

20. Ibid., p. 45.

21. Ibid., p. 19.

22. Fellner, William, Economic Theory amidst Political Currents: The Spreading Interest in Monetarism and the Theory of Market Expectations (Tübingen: Mohr, 1982)Google Scholar; see also Samuelson, Paul, “American Swing toward the Center Will Improve World Economy,” Japan Economic Journal, 16 11 1982, p. 20Google Scholar.

23. Pempel, T. J., Policy and Politics in Japan: Creative Conservatism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

24. Maraini, Fosco, “Japan and the Future: Some Suggestions from Nihonjin-Ron Literature,” in Fodella, Gianni, ed., Social Structures and Economic Dynamics in Japan up to 1980, Institute of Economic and Social Studies for East Asia (Milan: Luigi Bocconi University, 1975), pp. 15–17, 27–31, 53, 71Google Scholar.

25. Bank of Japan, Japanese Financial System, pp. 16ff., 124ffGoogle Scholar.

26. OECD, Economic Survey of Japan (Paris, 1981)Google Scholar.

27. Okumura, Hirohiko, “Japan's Reaction to the International Financial Developments,” International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies (Geneva, 1982)Google Scholar.

28. Suzuki, , Money and Banking, pp. 162ff., 230ffGoogle Scholar.

29. Ibid. For off-budget fiscal policy, see Sakakibara and Feldman, “Japanese Financial System.”

30. Bundesbank, Deutsche, “Die Zinsentwicklung seit 1980,” Monatsbericht der deutschen Bundesbank, 01 1983, pp. 14–25Google Scholar.

31. Okumura, “Japan's Reaction.”

32. “Monetary Authorities Sight Emergency Yen Measures,” Japan Economic Journal 6 (04 1982)Google Scholar; “Kokusaitekina Choseisaku Sagure” (International cooperation is required), Asahi Shimbun, 12 April 1982; Lewis, John, “A Bifocal Policy for Japan,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 12 09 1982Google Scholar; Okumura, “Japan's Reaction.”

33. On the still effective “invisible handshake” linking monetary authorities, private financial institutions, and business corporations, see Okumura, “Japan's Reaction.” On the “window guidance” that the Bank of Japan uses as a “fourth monetary policy instrument” besides bank rate changes, open market operations, and reserve requirement changes, see Bank of Japan, Japanese Financial System.

34. Saxonhouse, “Cyclical and Macrostructural.”

35. OECD, Economic Survey (1981)Google Scholar.

36. Noguchi, Yukio, “Nihon de Keinzu Seisaku wa okonowaretaka-Kyoko datta Keinzu jidai” (Was Keynesian Policy Conducted in Japan? The Keynesian Era That Was a Fiction), Kikan Gendai Keizai (Contemporary Economics Quarterly) 52 (1983), pp. 163–83Google Scholar.

37. Laffer, Arthur B. and Miles, Marc A., International Economics in an Integrated World (Glenview, III.: Scott, Foreman, 1982), pp. 63, 151ffGoogle Scholar.

38. Mundell, Robert, “Uncommon Arguments fora Common Currency,” in Johnson, Harry G. and Swoboda, Alexander, eds., The Economics of Common Currencies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Arthur B. Laffer, “Two Arguments for Fixed Rates,” in ibid., pp. 25–34.

39. Gravelle, Jane, “Comparative Tax Burdens in the United States and Japan and Implications for Relative Economic Growth,” Congressional Research Service Report no. 83–177E, 1983Google Scholar.

40. Vogel, Ezra, Japan's New Middle Class: The Salary Man and His Family in a Tokyo Suburb (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Vogel, , Japan as Number 1: Lessons for America (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979), pp. 131ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41. Vogel, Ezra, “Introduction: Toward More Accurate Concepts,” in Vogel, , ed., Modern Japanese Organization and Decision-Making (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975), pp. xv, xxGoogle Scholar; and Vogel, , Japan as Number 1, p. 70Google Scholar.

42. Suzuki, , Money and Banking, pp. 13, 40Google Scholar; Bank of Japan, Japanese Financial System, pp. 16–18Google Scholar.

43. Sargent, Thomas J. and Wallace, Neil, “Rational Expectation and the Theory of Economic Policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics 2 (1976), p. 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. Vogel, , Japan as Number 1, pp. 29–30Google Scholar.

45. Schmiegelow, Michéle, La reforme du droit économique extérieur, la liberalisation des mouvements de capitaux el la situation des banques étrangères au Japon, Japan-Europe Economic Research Center, Université Catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, 1981), pp. 1–48Google Scholar.

46. Okumura, , “Japan's Reaction,” p. 8Google Scholar.

47. Suzuki, Money and Banking; Bank of Japan, Japanese Financial System; Okumura, “Japan's Reaction.”

48. See OECD, Economic Survey (1981), p. 58Google Scholar.

49. Okumura, “Japan's Reaction.”

50. Ibid.

51. Boltho, Andrea, Japan: An Economic Survey, 1953–1973 (London: Oxford University Press, 1975), p. 97Google Scholar; Suzuki, , Money and Banking, p. 145Google Scholar.

52. Saxonhouse, , “Cyclical and Macrostructural,” p. 135Google Scholar.

53. Leontieff, Vassili, “Input-Output Analysis and Its Use in Peace and War Economies,” American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, 05 1939, pp. 211–25Google Scholar; see also Kuznetz, Simon S., Secular Movements in Production and Prices: Their Nature and Their Bearing upon Cyclical Fluctuations (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1930), p. 322Google Scholar. Interestingly enough, both Leontieff and Kuznetz to some extent subscribe to the view of the German Historical School: an intensive study of structural changes that mark the development of every national economy constitutes an important task of empirical research. They view input-output analysis as a suitable bridge between general equilibrium theory and empirical research.

54. Ohkawa, and Rosovsky, , Japanese Economic Growth, pp. 44, 67, 89, 218ffGoogle Scholar. For the concept of unexplained residual, see also Solow, Robert M., Capital Theory and the Rate of Return (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1964), pp. 38–39Google Scholar.

55. SirHarrod, Roy, Economic Dynamics (London: Macmillan, 1973), pp. 28ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. Patrick, Hugh and Rosovsky, Henry, “The End of Eras: Japan and the Western World in the 1970's and 1980's” (working paper prepared for the Japan Political Economy Research Conference, framework conference, 25–29 July 1983, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii), pp.3, 11Google Scholar.

57. As developed progressively in Schumpeter, Joseph A., The Theory of Economic Development, trans. Opie, R. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934)Google Scholar; Business Cycles (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939)Google Scholar; and Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1949)Google Scholar.

58. Schumpeter, , Capitalism, p. 67Google Scholar.

59. Ibid., p. 84.

60. Abegglen, James C. and Rapp, William V., “Competitive Impact of Japan's Growth,” in Cohen, James, ed., Pacific Partnership: United States-Japan Trade (Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1972)Google Scholar.

61. Tinbergen, Jan, Economic Policy: Principles and Design (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1956)Google Scholar, and On the Theory of Economic Policy (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1959)Google Scholar.

62. Maraini, “Japan and the Future.”

63. Vogel, Japan's New Middle Class.

64. Pempel, Policy and Politics; Bennet and Levine, “Industrialization”; Vogel, Japan as Number 1.

65. Maraini, , “Japan and the Future,” p. 71Google Scholar.

66. Schmiegelow, Réforme du droit.

67. Aron, Raymond, Paix el guerre entre les nations (Paris: Calmann-Levy, 1962), pp. 17–20Google Scholar; Hoffmann, Stanley, Contemporary Theories in International Relations (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1960)Google Scholar.

68. Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979)Google Scholar; Knorr, Klaus, Power and Wealth: The Political Economy of International Power (New York: Basic Books, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69. Brzezinski, Zbigniew, “East Asia and Global Security: Implications for Japan,” Journal of International Affairs 37 (Summer 1983), pp. 5–12Google Scholar. See also former U.S. under-secretary of state, Lawrence Eagleburger, “The Transatlantic Relationship: A Long-Term View,” NATO Review, 02 1984, pp. 10–16Google Scholar.

70. See Katzenstein, , “International Relations,” pp. 9–12Google Scholar.

71. Haas, Ernst B., Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism in International Organizations (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964), pp. 29–38Google Scholar.

72. Cox, Robert W., “On Thinking about Future World Order,” World Politics 28 (01 1966), p. 181Google Scholar.

73. For the interdependence paradigm, see Cooper, Richard N., “Macroeconomic Policy Adjustment in Interdependent Economies,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 83 (02 1969), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bergsten, C. Fred, Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S., “International Economics and International Politics: A Framework for Analysis,” International Organization 29 (Winter 1975), pp. 6, 20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the transnational paradigm, see Vernon, Raymond, Sovereignty at Bay (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Vernon, , “Sovereignty at Bay Ten Years Later,” International Organization 35 (Summer 1981), pp. 513–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morse, Edward L., “Transnational Economic Processes,” in Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., eds., “Transnational Relations and World Politics,” International Organization 25 (Summer 1971), pp. 373–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74. Saxonhouse, “Cyclical and Macrostructural.”

75. Cox, Robert W., “Ideologies and the New International Economic Order: Reflections on Some Recent Literature,” International Organization 33 (Spring 1979), pp. 257–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76. Johnson, Harry G., “Commodities: LDC Demands and Developed Countries' Responses” (paper prepared for the MIT Workshop “The New International Economic Order,” Cambridge, Mass., 05 1976)Google Scholar; and Jagdish Bhagwati, as quoted by Cox, “Ideologies.”

77. Stockwin, J. A. A., “Where Is Japan Headed?” Australia-Japan Relations Project Research Paper (Canberra: Australian National University, 1975)Google Scholar.

78. Schmiegelow, and Schmiegelow, , “New Mercantilism,” p. 369Google Scholar.

79. Gilpin, Robert, US Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gilpin, , “Three Models of the Future,” International Organization 29 (Winter 1975), pp. 37–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80. Gilpin, US Power, p. 44. On the other hand, Gilpin too admits what is frequently argued from the standpoint of dependencia theory, namely that American multinational enterprises were instrumental in procuring raw materials and maintaining the U.S. military and political presence (ibid., p. 148).

81. Kojima, Kiyoshi, Japan and a New World Economic Order (London: Croom Helm, 1977), pp. 75–119Google Scholar; see also Ozawa, Terutomo, Multinationalism, Japanese Style: The Political Economy of Outward Dependence (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), pp. 4–21Google Scholar.

82. Vernon, Raymond, “International Investment in International Trade and the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 18 (1966), pp. 199–207Google Scholar; Hymer, Stephen, “The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development,” in Bhagwati, Jagdish, ed., Economics and World Order: From the 1970's to the 1990's (New York: Free Press, 1972), pp. 113–40Google Scholar.

83. Schmiegelow, Henrik, Japans Aussenwirtschaftspolitik: merkantilisch, liberaloderfunctionell? (Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde, 1981), n. 118Google Scholar.

84. See Gilpin, “Three Models”; Cox, “Ideologies.”

85. Senghaas, Dieter, Von Europa lernen: entwicklungsgeschkhtliche Betrachtungen (Frankfurt/ M.: Suhrkamp, 1982), p. 11Google Scholar.

86. Ibid., pp. 258ff.; Senghaas, , “More Self-Reliance as an Alternative Policy,” in Deutsch, Karl W. et al. , Problems of World Modeling: Political and Social Implications (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1977), pp. 131–50Google Scholar.

87. Katzenstein, “International Relations”; Pempel, “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy.”

88. Pempel, “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy.”

89. Bennet, and Levine, , “Industrialization”; Pempel, T. J., Policy-Making in Contemporary Japan (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977)Google Scholar.

90. Bergsten, “What to Do?”

91. West Germany's then minister of economics, Otto Graf Lambsdorf, in an address to the “Japan-German Economic Talks” in Kyoto, April 1982; Lambsdorf qualified tariffs as the first dimension of protectionism, nontarifT barriers as the second, and the “picking-the-winner” strategy of industrial policy as the third.

92. For a detailed discussion of the content of the two laws, see Upham, Frank G., Legal Framework of Structurally Depressed Industry Policy, Harvard University Program on US-Japan Relations working paper (Cambridge, Mass., 1983)Google Scholar.

93. Strange, Susan and Tooze, Roger, “The Management of Surplus Capacity and International Political Economy,” in Strange, and Tooze, , eds., The International Politics of Surplus Capacity: Competition for Market Shares in the World Recession (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981), pp. 211–12Google Scholar.

94. See Sato, Kazuo, “The Demand Function for Industrial Exports: A Cross-Country Analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics 59 (11 1977), pp. 456–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95. Beyfuss, Jörg, Die Position der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Welthandel (Cologne: Deutscher Instituts-Verlag, 1982), p. 33Google Scholar; Laumer, Helmut, “Japans Wirtschaft in der achtziger Jahren, Perspektiven, Chancen, Risiken,” Munich IfO Schnelldienst nos. 35–36 (1980), pp. 16ff.Google Scholar; Scharrer, Hans-Eckart, Hesse, Warren, and Krägenau, Henry, Japans Wirtschafsentwicklung, Aussenhandel und Weltbewerbfàhigkeit (Hamburg: Weltarchiv, 1982), pp. 201–93Google Scholar.

96. Stockwin, “Where Is Japan Headed?”

97. Editorial, “Japan: Diplomatic Cripple?” Foreign Policy no. 14, (1974), p. 125Google Scholar. See also Edwin O. Reischauer, “Their Special Strength,” ibid., p. 151, on the long-range orientation and the remarkable “prescience” of Japanese “natural resources diplomacy”; and Johnson, “Commodities.”

98. Fukai, Shigeko, “Japan's North-South Dialogue at the United Nations,” World Politics 35 (10 1982), pp. 73–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99. Ozawa, , Multinationalism, pp. 193, 226ff., 326Google Scholar.

100. Schmiegelow, Reforme du droit.

101. Ozaki, Robert, The Control of Imports and Foreign Capital in Japan (New York: Praeger, 1972), p. 68Google Scholar.

102. US International Trade Commission, “Foreign Industrial Targeting and Its Effects on US Industries, Phase I: Japan,” Report to the Committee on Ways and Means, US House of Representatives (10 1983), p. 5Google Scholar.

103. Page, Sheila A., “The Increased Use of Trade Controls in Industrialized Countries,” Intereconomics (05/06 1980), pp. 144ff.Google Scholar; Reich, “Beyond Free Trade.”

104. Schmiegelow, , Réforme du droit, pp. 23–31Google Scholar.

105. Bank of Japan, Balance of Payments Monthly Statistics, current issues.

106. Schmiegelow, , Japans Aussenwirtschaftspolitik, pp. 75ff.Google Scholar; Greenwood, John G., “US-Japan Economic Relations, 1970–1973,” in McCracken, Paul, ed., Japan-US Assembly, Proceedings of a Conference on Japan-US Economic Policy (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1975), pp. 95–106Google Scholar.

107. Quirk, Peter J., “Exchange Policy in Japan: Leaning against the Wind,” IMF Staff Papers 24 (11 1977), pp. 642–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108. Lewis, , “Bifocal Policy.” As for a much closer link-up of German monetary policy with the level of American interest rates, see Deutsche Bundesbank, “Die Wirtschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Sommer 1980,” Monatsbericht derdeutschen Bundesbank, 09 1980, p. 1Google Scholar.

109. Argy, Viktor, Exchange Rate Management in Theory and Practice, Princeton Studies in International Finance no. 50 (Princeton, N.J., 10 1982)Google Scholar.

110. Abbeglen, James C. and Stalk, George, “Japanese Trading Companies: A Dying Industry?” Wall Street Journal, 18 07 1983Google Scholar.

111. On the distribution system, see Laumer, Helmut, Die Warendistribution in Japan, Versuch eines Vergleichs mit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde, 1979)Google Scholar; for the trading houses, see also Eli, Max and Laumer, Helmut, Sogo Sosha: Strukturen und Stralegie japanische Welthandelsunternehmungen (Düsseldorf: Ekon, 1979)Google Scholar.

112. Upham, , Legal Framework; Schmiegelow, Japans Aussenwirtschaftspolitik, p. 88Google Scholar.

113. Blum, Reinhart, Soziale Marktwirtschaft, Wirtschaftspolitik zwischen Neo-Liberalismus und Ordo-Liberalismus (Tübingen: Mohr, 1969)Google Scholar.

114. Schmiegelow, , Japans Aussenwirtschaftspolitik, pp. 89–93Google Scholar.

115. Reich, “Beyond Free Trade.”

116. OECD, Positive Adjustment Policy-Managing Structural Change (Paris, 1983)Google Scholar.

117. Blum, Soziale Marktwirtschaft; see also Schiller, Karl, “Wirtschaftspolitik,” in von Beckerath, Erwin et al. , Handwörterbuch der Sozialwissenschaften (Stuttgart: Fischer, 1965), pp. 210ffGoogle Scholar.

118. Kneer, Joseph, “Reaganomics-Elemente der amerikanischen Wirtschaftspolitik,” Wirtschaftsdienst, 01 1982, p. 33Google Scholar.

119. OECD, International Trade and High Technology Products: An Empirical Approach, DSTI/SPR/83. 13 Part 2 (Paris, 1983), pp. 57–58Google Scholar.

120. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft, “Hochtechnologien und internationale Wettbewerbsfahigkeit der deutschen Wirtschaft,” Dokumentation no. 263 (1984), p. 23Google Scholar.

121. Patrick, Hugh, “Japanese Industrial Policy and Its Relevance for United States Industrial Policy,” statement before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress (13 07 1983), p. 24Google Scholar.

122. Kahn, in his Emerging Japanese Superstate, was probably the first to use the term. See also Johnson, Chalmers, The MITI and the Japanese Economic Miracle (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar.

123. Vogel, Modern Japanese Organization, and Japan as Number I.

124. For an overview, see Maraini, “Japan and the Future.”

125. Patrick, Japanese Industrial Policy.

126. Lowe, Adolf, On Economic Knowledge: Towards a Science of Political Economy (White Plains, N.Y.: Sharpe, 1977), pp. 232, 239Google Scholar.

127. Schumpeter, Capitalism.