Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:16:03.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution Without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Michael Barnett
Michael Barnett
Affiliation:
Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. E-mail: mbarnett@umn.edu
Get access

Abstract

Many theories of international relations contain a narrative of progress and explain that progress with reference to evolutionary imagery. This article examines critically: the relevance of Darwinian and Lamarckian models of international relations to the evolution of international ethics and institutions; and the possibility that the ethics and norms are likely to be more consistent with existing world orders than challengers to it. Specifically, this article draws from evolutionary social science and organizational theory to develop a framework to explore the initial diversity of the meaning and practices of humanitarianism; how the combination of environmental mechanisms and organizational culture led many humanitarian agencies to adapt to their environment in ways that incorporated politics; and the subsequent countermovement by some agencies who wanted to purify humanitarianism. I then apply this framework to explain the recent history of four international aid agencies. I conclude with several observations regarding how the model as applied to these cases allows us to examine critically the selection mechanisms that do and do not account for ethical change and how scholars of international norms, ethics, and progress should be attentive to how principled actors are creatures of the world they want to transform.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 621 - 663
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Emanuel. 1991. Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and their Progress. In Progress in Postwar International Relations, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, 43–88. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, Crawford, Beverly, and Donnelly, Jack. 1991. Defining and Conceptualizing Progress in International Relations. In Progress in Postwar International Relations, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, 1–43. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Howard. 1999. Organizations Evolving. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert M. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2001. Humanitarianism with a Sovereign Face: UNHCR in the Global Undertow. International Migration Review 35 (1):244–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2005. Humanitarianism Transformed. Perspectives on Politics 3 (4):723–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Coleman, Liv. 2005. Designing Police: Interpol and the Study of Change in International Organizations. International Studies Quarterly 49 (4):593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in World Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Weiss, Thomas G.. 2008. Humanitarianism: A Brief History of the Present. In Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics, edited by Barnett, Michael and Weiss, Thomas, 1–48. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baudendistel, Rainer. 2006. Between Bombs and Good Intentions: The Red Cross and the Italo-Ethiopian War, 1935–1936. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul. 2005. The Power and the Idealists: Or, The Passion of Joschka Fischer, and Its Aftermath. New York: Soft Skull.Google Scholar
Bernier, Philipe. 1992. Des Médecins sans Frontières. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, Lebow, Richard Ned, Stein, Janice Gross, and Weber, Steve. 2000. God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World. European Journal of International Relations 6 (1):43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean. 2000. Is Humanitarian Action Everybody's Affair? Reflections on an Overworked Concept. International Review of the Red Cross 838:327–37.Google Scholar
Bloomstein, Charles. 1954. History of CARE. Boxes 2, 3, 4. Charles Bloomstein Collected Papers, 1938–2002. Swarthmore College Peace Collection, Swarthmore, Pa.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Ken. 2007. Theory of World Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolotti, Dan. 2006. Hope in Hell: Inside the World of Doctors Without Borders. Buffalo, N.Y.: Firefly Books.Google Scholar
Brauman, Rony. 2006. Penser dans L'urgence: Parcours Critique d'un Humanitaire (Entretiens avec Catherine Portevin). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Wallace J. 1990. The History of CARE: A Personal Account. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
CARE USA. 2006. White Paper on Food Aid Policy. 6 June 2006. Available at ⟨http://www.care.org/newsroom/publications/whitepapers/food_aid_whitepaper.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
CARE USA. n.d.Frequently Asked Questions about RBA. Atlanta, GA: Care International.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2001a. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. American Political Science Review 95 (1):15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2001b. Modeling the Democratic Peace as a Kantian Selection Process. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4):470–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, David. 2002. From Kosovo to Kabul and Beyond: Human Rights and International Intervention. New York: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chimni, B.S. 1993. The Meaning of Words and the Role of UNHCR in Voluntary Repatriation. International Journal of Refugee Law 5:442–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimni, B.S. 2004. International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making. European Journal of International Law 15 (1):1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, Gervase. 1989. Approaching the Refugee Problem Today. In Refugees and International Relations, edited by Loescher, Gil and Monahan, Laila, 373–410. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Ron, James. 2002. The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action. International Security 27 (1):5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, J. F. 2001. Mind the Gap! UNHCR, Humanitarian Assistance, and the Development Process. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 43. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, S. Alex, and Pugh, Michael. 1999. UNHCR as Leader in Humanitarian Assistance: A Triumph of Politics over Law? In Refugee Rights and Realities: Evolving International Concepts and Regimes, edited by Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick, 175–99. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curti, Merle. 1988. American Philanthropy Abroad: A History. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Cutts, Mark. 1998. Politics and Humanitarianism. Refugee Survey Quarterly 17 (1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMars, William E. 2005. NGOs and Transnational Networks: Wild Cards in World Politics. New York: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
de Torrente, Nicolas. 2004. Humanitarian Action Under Attack: Reflections on the Iraq War. Harvard Human Rights Journal 17:1–31.Google Scholar
de Waal, Alex. 1998. Famine Crimes: Politics & the Disaster Relief Industry in Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2):147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank. 1994. Cultural Models of Organization: The Social Construction of Rational Organizing Principles. In The Sociology of Culture, edited by Crane, Diana, 116–41. Boston, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Donini, Antonio. 2004. The Future of Humanitarian Action: Implications of Iraq and Other Recent Crises. Medford, Mass.: Tufts University, Feinstein International Famine Center. Available at ⟨http://www.odi.org.uk/hpg/papers/tufts.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 June 2009.Google ScholarPubMed
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1998. Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism. International Organization 52 (2):397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Duffield, Mark. 2007. Development, Security, and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Boston, Mass.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Eckersley, Robyn. 2008. The Ethics of Critical Theory. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Snidal, Duncan and Reus-Smit, Christian, 346–58. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eliason, Jan. 2002. Ten Years of Humanitarian Action. In The Humanitarian Decade: Challenges for Humanitarian Assistance in the Last Decade and Into the Future. Vol. 1, Panel Discussion on the Occasion of the Tenth Anniversary of General Assembly Resolution 46/182, 7–16. New York: United Nations Office of the Coordinator for Humanitarian Assistance.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2004. State Death in the International System. International Organization 58 (2):311–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein International Famine Center. 2004. Ambiguity and Change: Humanitarian NGOs Prepare for the Future. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Available at ⟨http://www.un-ngls.org/orf/cso/cso5/ambiguity_and_change.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2004. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. International Norms and Political Change. In Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., 247–78. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 1996. The Evolution of International Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (3):363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, David P. 2001. UNHCR's Mandate: The Politics of Being Non-Political. New Issues in Refugee Research Working Paper No. 33. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. 2005. The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Fiona. 2001. New Humanitarianism: Does It Provide a Moral Banner for the 21st Century? Disasters 25 (4):275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakenberger, Timothy R., Drinkwater, Michael, and Maxwell, Daniel. 2000. Operationalizing Household Livelihood Security: A Holistic Approach for Addressing Poverty and Vulnerability. Atlanta, Ga.: CARE. Available at ⟨http://pqdl.care.org/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_2AC49EBF8E68F18638C33E4AC9FCD8B633630600⟩. Accessed 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
Gilady, Lilach, and Hoffmann, Matthew. 2008. Revisiting the Giraffe's Neck: How International Relations Gets Evolution Wrong. Paper presented at the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1991. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1997. Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress. Vol. 1, The Rise and Decline of Nationalism. Ithaca N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Kevin M. 1999. CARE International: Evolving to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (4):109–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocke, Jean-Pierre. 1986. Beyond Humanitarianism and the Need for Political Will to Resolve Today's Refuge Problem. Joyce Pearce Memorial Lecture, Oxford University, 29 October 1986.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin, and Knudsen, Thorjørn. 2006a. The Nature and Units of Social Selection. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16 (5):477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin, and Knudsen, Thorjørn. 2006b. Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian are Misleading. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16 (4):343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Peter J., and Weiss, Thomas J.. 2006. Sword and Salve: Confronting New Wars and Humanitarian Crises. Littlefield, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Holborn, Louise. 1975. Refugees, a Problem for Our Time: The Work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 1950–1970. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Hopgood, Stephen. 2008. Saying ‘No’ to Walmart? Money and Morality in Professional Humanitarianism. In Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics, edited by Barnett, Michael and Weiss, Thomas J., 98–123. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1990. Kant and the Kantian Paradigm in International Relations. Review of International Studies 16 (3):183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, John. 1997. Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
International Studies Quarterly. 1996. 40 (3).Google Scholar
Irvine, Graeme. 1992. Strategic Directions for World Vision International, 1990–1992. Monrovia, CA: World Vision International.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1999. Evolution, Choice, and International Change. In Strategic Choice in International Relations, edited by Lake, David A. and Powell, Robert, 165–96. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Judith. 2008. Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of Election Monitoring. International Organization 62 (2):221–55.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1986. International Refugee Protection. Human Rights Quarterly 8:1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1995. Power Politics, Institutions, and Transnational Relations. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions, edited by Risse-Kappen, Thomas, 257–79. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyoichi, Sugino. 1998. The ‘Non-Political and Humanitarian Clause’ in UNHCR's Statute. Refugee Survey Quarterly 17 (1):33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Orion, and Steinmo, Sven. 2007. Taking Evolution Seriously. ARENA Working Paper No. 19. Oslo, Norway: Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Linkalter, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Linkalter, Andrew. 2007. Towards a Sociology of Global Morals with an ‘Emancipatory Intent.’ Review of International Studies 33 (S1):135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loescher, Gil. 1993. Beyond Charity: International Cooperation and the Global Refugee Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loescher, Gil. 2001. The UNHCR and World Politics: A Perilous Path. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, Joanna. 1999. Aiding Peace … and War: UNHCR, Returnee Reintegration, and the Relief-Development Debate. New Issues in Refugee Research Working Paper No. 14. Geneva: Center for Documentation and Research, UNHCR.Google Scholar
Macrae, Joanna. 2002. The New Humanitarianisms: A Review of Trends in Global Humanitarian Action. Humanitarian Policy Group Report 11. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Macrae, Joanna, Collinson, Sarah, Buchanan-Smith, Margie, Reindorp, Nicola, Schmidt, Anna, Mowjee, Tasneem, and Harmer, Adele. 2002. Uncertain Power: The Changing Role of Official Donors in Humanitarian Action. Humanitarian Policy Group Report 12. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCaston, M. Katherine. 2005. Moving CARE's Programming Forward: Unifying Framework for Poverty Eradication and Social Justice and Underlying Causes of Poverty. Atlanta, Ga.: CARE.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2):340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minear, Larry. 2002. The Humanitarian Enterprise: Dilemmas and Discoveries. West Hartford, Conn.: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Moore, David. 2000. Humanitarian Agendas, State Reconstruction, and Democratization Processes in War-Torn Societies. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 24. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.Google Scholar
Myers, Bryant L. 1999. Walking with the Poor: Principles and Practices of Transformational Development. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 2006. Evolutionary Social Science and Universal Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16 (5):491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 2007. Comment on Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian are Misleading. by Holdgson and Knudsen. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17 (3):349–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. Bruce. 1988. The Uneasy Alliance: Religion, Refugee Work, and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ninin, Catherine, and Deldique, Pierre-Édouard. 1991. Globe Doctors: 20 Ans D'aventure Humanitaire. Paris: Pierre Belfond.Google Scholar
Nyers, Peter. 1999. Emergency or Emerging Identities? Refugees and Transformations in World Order. Millennium 28 (1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogata, Sadako. 1996. World Order, Internal Conflict, and Refugees. Lecture delivered at Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 28 October 1996.Google Scholar
Ogata, Sadako. 1999a. Half a Century on the Humanitarian Frontlines. Lecture delivered at Graduate Institute for International Studies, Geneva, 25 November 1999.Google Scholar
Ogata, Sadako. 1999b. On the Humanitarian Frontlines: New Challenges to Refugee Work. Lecture delivered at Harvard University, November, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Ogata, Sadako. 2005. The Turbulent Decade: Confronting the Refugee Crises of the 1990s. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Oliver, Christine. 1991. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review 16 (1):145–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbinski, James. 2008. An Imperfect Offering: Humanitarian Action in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto, Canada: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Paris, Roland. 2004. At War's End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. 2001. The Evolution of International Norms: Choice, Learning, Power, and Identity. In Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics, edited by Thompson, William R., 133–74. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, Gerald R.. 2003. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean. 1979. The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross: A Commentary. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitterman, Shelly. 1985. International Responses to Refugee Situations: The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. In Refugees in World Politics, edited by Ferris, Elizabeth G., 43–81. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M. 2003. Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy World Politics. World Politics 55 (4):579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M. 2008a. Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. International Organization 62 (2):191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M. 2008b. Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Randel, Judith, and German, Tony. 2002. Trends in the Financing of Humanitarian Assistance. In The New Humanitarianism: A Review of Trends in Global Humanitarian Action, edited by Macrae, Joanne, 19–28. Humanitarian Policy Group Report 11. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Rieff, David. 2002. A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1987. The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Studies Quarterly 32 (4):493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapcott, Ricard. 2008. Anti-Cosmopolitanism, Pluralism, and the Cosmopolitan Harm Principle. Review of International Studies 34 (2):185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skran, Claudena. 1992. The International Refugee Regime: The Historical and Contemporary Context of International Responses to Asylum Problems. In Refugees and the Asylum Dilemma in the West, edited by Loescher, Gil, 8–34. College Station: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law 6 (4):503–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slim, Hugo. 2004. Protecting Civilians: Putting the Individual at the Humanitarian Centre. In The Humanitarian Decade: Challenges for Humanitarian Assistance in the Last Decade and into the Future. Vol. 2, General Assembly Resolution 46/182: The Development of Practice, Principles and the Humanitarian Framework, edited by Office of the Coordinator of Humanitarian Assistance, 154–69. New York: United Nations Press.Google Scholar
Smillie, Ian, and Minear, Larry. 2004. The Charity of Nations: Humanitarian Action in a Calculating World. Bloomfield, Conn.: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2001. Diversity or Uniformity in the Modern World? Answers from Evolutionary Theory, Learning, and Social Adaptation. In Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics, edited by Thompson, William, 110–32. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross. 2008. Humanitarian Organizations: Accountable—Why, to Whom, for What, and How? In Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics, edited by Barnett, Michael and Weiss, Thomas G., 124–42. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2000. Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1):97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, Abby. 2002. Trends in U.S. Humanitarian Policy. Humanitarian Policy Group Report 3. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Taithe, Bertrand. 2004. Reinventing (French) Universalism: Religion, Humanitarianism and the ‘French Doctors.’ Modern and Contemporary France 12 (2):147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, Fiona. 2002. Condemned to Repeat? The Paradox of Humanitarian Action. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thayer, Bradley A. 2000. Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Realism, and International Politics. International Security 25 (2):124–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Bradley A. 2004. Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Thompson, William, ed. 2001. Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
UNHCR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). Various Years. Notes on International Protection.Google Scholar
UNHCR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). Executive Committee. Various Years. Conclusions.Google Scholar
Vallaeys, Anne. 2004. Médecins sans Frontières: La Biographie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diana. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora, and Snidal, Duncan. 2007. The Evolutionary Design of International Institutions. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, February-March, Chicago.Google Scholar
Warner, Daniel. 1994. Voluntary Repatriation and the Meaning of Return to Home: A Critique of Liberal Mathematics. Journal for Refugee Studies 7 (2–3):160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Daniel. 1999. The Politics of the Political/Humanitarian Divide. International Review of the Red Cross 833:109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Olivier. 1995. French Doctors: Les 25 Ans D'épopée des Hommes et des Femmes qui ont Inventé la Médecine Humanitaire. Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 1999. Principle, Politics, and Humanitarian Action. Ethics and International Affairs 13:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, Fabrice. 2003. In the Shadow of Just Wars : Violence, Politics, and Humanitarian Action. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Whaites, Alan. 1999. Pursuing Partnership: World Vision and the Ideology of Development—A Case Study. Development in Practice 9 (4):410–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2001. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Vision International. 2002. New Vision Journey Findings—Executive Summary. Monrovia, CA: World Vision International.Google Scholar